From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave@sr71.net,
isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hotplug: Verify hotplug memory range
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:52:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5204838E.1060602@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375980460-28311-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com>
On 08/09/2013 12:47 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> add_memory() and remove_memory() can only handle a memory range aligned
> with section. There are problems when an unaligned range is added and
> then deleted as follows:
>
> - add_memory() with an unaligned range succeeds, but __add_pages()
> called from add_memory() adds a whole section of pages even though
> a given memory range is less than the section size.
> - remove_memory() to the added unaligned range hits BUG_ON() in
> __remove_pages().
>
> This patch changes add_memory() and remove_memory() to check if a given
> memory range is aligned with section at the beginning. As the result,
> add_memory() fails with -EINVAL when a given range is unaligned, and
> does not add such memory range. This prevents remove_memory() to be
> called with an unaligned range as well. Note that remove_memory() has
> to use BUG_ON() since this function cannot fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani<toshi.kani@hp.com>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index ca1dd3a..ac182de 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1069,6 +1069,22 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int check_hotplug_memory_range(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + u64 start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + u64 nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + /* Memory range must be aligned with section */
> + if ((start_pfn& ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK) ||
> + (nr_pages % PAGES_PER_SECTION) || (!nr_pages)) {
> + pr_err("Unsupported hotplug range: start 0x%llx, size 0x%llx\n",
> + start, size);
I think the message here should tell users that only support range aligned
to section. Others seems OK to me.
Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Thanks.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* we are OK calling __meminit stuff here - we have CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> @@ -1078,6 +1094,10 @@ int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> struct resource *res;
> int ret;
>
> + ret = check_hotplug_memory_range(start, size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> lock_memory_hotplug();
>
> res = register_memory_resource(start, size);
> @@ -1786,6 +1806,8 @@ void __ref remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + BUG_ON(check_hotplug_memory_range(start, size));
> +
> lock_memory_hotplug();
>
> /*
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave@sr71.net,
isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hotplug: Verify hotplug memory range
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 13:52:14 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5204838E.1060602@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375980460-28311-1-git-send-email-toshi.kani@hp.com>
On 08/09/2013 12:47 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> add_memory() and remove_memory() can only handle a memory range aligned
> with section. There are problems when an unaligned range is added and
> then deleted as follows:
>
> - add_memory() with an unaligned range succeeds, but __add_pages()
> called from add_memory() adds a whole section of pages even though
> a given memory range is less than the section size.
> - remove_memory() to the added unaligned range hits BUG_ON() in
> __remove_pages().
>
> This patch changes add_memory() and remove_memory() to check if a given
> memory range is aligned with section at the beginning. As the result,
> add_memory() fails with -EINVAL when a given range is unaligned, and
> does not add such memory range. This prevents remove_memory() to be
> called with an unaligned range as well. Note that remove_memory() has
> to use BUG_ON() since this function cannot fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani<toshi.kani@hp.com>
> ---
> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index ca1dd3a..ac182de 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -1069,6 +1069,22 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int check_hotplug_memory_range(u64 start, u64 size)
> +{
> + u64 start_pfn = start>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + u64 nr_pages = size>> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +
> + /* Memory range must be aligned with section */
> + if ((start_pfn& ~PAGE_SECTION_MASK) ||
> + (nr_pages % PAGES_PER_SECTION) || (!nr_pages)) {
> + pr_err("Unsupported hotplug range: start 0x%llx, size 0x%llx\n",
> + start, size);
I think the message here should tell users that only support range aligned
to section. Others seems OK to me.
Reviewed-by: Tang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
Thanks.
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /* we are OK calling __meminit stuff here - we have CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG */
> int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> @@ -1078,6 +1094,10 @@ int __ref add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> struct resource *res;
> int ret;
>
> + ret = check_hotplug_memory_range(start, size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> lock_memory_hotplug();
>
> res = register_memory_resource(start, size);
> @@ -1786,6 +1806,8 @@ void __ref remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> {
> int ret;
>
> + BUG_ON(check_hotplug_memory_range(start, size));
> +
> lock_memory_hotplug();
>
> /*
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-09 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-08 16:47 [PATCH] mm/hotplug: Verify hotplug memory range Toshi Kani
2013-08-08 16:47 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-08 19:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-08-08 19:53 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2013-08-08 19:59 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-08 19:59 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-09 5:52 ` Tang Chen [this message]
2013-08-09 5:52 ` Tang Chen
2013-08-09 15:33 ` Toshi Kani
2013-08-09 15:33 ` Toshi Kani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5204838E.1060602@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@sr71.net \
--cc=isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=vasilis.liaskovitis@profitbricks.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.