All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Fabio Fantoni <fabio.fantoni@m2r.biz>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	seabios <seabios@seabios.org>,
	mjt@tls.msk.ru, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	pkg-qemu-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Test report for xen-unstable and qemu-xen
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:09:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520A1407.1060301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520A0B5E.8080405@m2r.biz>

On 08/13/13 12:33, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> Il 13/08/2013 12:04, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
>> CC'ing Gerd and the seabios list:
>>
>> On 08/13/13 11:16, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>>> Il 12/08/2013 17:04, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:

>>>> New issue:
>>>> - domU not start with qemu 1.5.1 and more that 2 gb of ram:
>>>>    tested on w7 64 bit domU with 4 gb of ram, with built-in qemu 1.3 it
>>>> works,
>>>>    while with qemu 1.5.1 doesn't (stops at the beginning, spice client
>>>> show only the lines of seabios version and machine UUID;
>>>>    qemu log show nothing more that 2 gb test), while with 2 gb of ram
>>>> works also with qemu 1.5.1
>>>> -------------------------
>>> Added qemu-devel and debian maintainers to cc for this regression about
>>> upstream qemu.
>>> If you need more details and tests tell me and I'll do/post them.
>> As a superficial guess, this could be fixed by the seabios-1.7.3.1
>> release:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/227536
>>
>> http://code.coreboot.org/p/seabios/source/commit/2a9aeabdfb34374ecac25e7a8d21c9e368618cd4/
>>
>>
>> Laszlo
> 
> Thanks for reply, i did fast test adding this patch that you linked:
> http://code.coreboot.org/p/seabios/source/commit/2a9aeabdfb34374ecac25e7a8d21c9e368618cd4/
> 
> Same result, the problem remains, should I test full seabios 1.7.3.1?

No idea, it was just a random shot, sorry... You're probably down to
bisecting qemu :(

Laszlo

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Fabio Fantoni <fabio.fantoni@m2r.biz>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>,
	seabios <seabios@seabios.org>,
	mjt@tls.msk.ru, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	pkg-qemu-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Test report for xen-unstable and qemu-xen
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:09:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520A1407.1060301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <520A0B5E.8080405@m2r.biz>

On 08/13/13 12:33, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> Il 13/08/2013 12:04, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
>> CC'ing Gerd and the seabios list:
>>
>> On 08/13/13 11:16, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
>>> Il 12/08/2013 17:04, Fabio Fantoni ha scritto:

>>>> New issue:
>>>> - domU not start with qemu 1.5.1 and more that 2 gb of ram:
>>>>    tested on w7 64 bit domU with 4 gb of ram, with built-in qemu 1.3 it
>>>> works,
>>>>    while with qemu 1.5.1 doesn't (stops at the beginning, spice client
>>>> show only the lines of seabios version and machine UUID;
>>>>    qemu log show nothing more that 2 gb test), while with 2 gb of ram
>>>> works also with qemu 1.5.1
>>>> -------------------------
>>> Added qemu-devel and debian maintainers to cc for this regression about
>>> upstream qemu.
>>> If you need more details and tests tell me and I'll do/post them.
>> As a superficial guess, this could be fixed by the seabios-1.7.3.1
>> release:
>>
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/227536
>>
>> http://code.coreboot.org/p/seabios/source/commit/2a9aeabdfb34374ecac25e7a8d21c9e368618cd4/
>>
>>
>> Laszlo
> 
> Thanks for reply, i did fast test adding this patch that you linked:
> http://code.coreboot.org/p/seabios/source/commit/2a9aeabdfb34374ecac25e7a8d21c9e368618cd4/
> 
> Same result, the problem remains, should I test full seabios 1.7.3.1?

No idea, it was just a random shot, sorry... You're probably down to
bisecting qemu :(

Laszlo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-13 11:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-12 15:04 Test report for xen-unstable and qemu-xen Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-13  9:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-13  9:16   ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-13 10:04   ` [Qemu-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-13 10:04     ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-13 10:33     ` [Qemu-devel] " Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-13 10:33       ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-13 11:09       ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2013-08-13 11:09         ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-13 13:26         ` [Qemu-devel] " Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-13 13:26           ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-13 23:58           ` [Qemu-devel] " Kevin O'Connor
2013-08-13 23:58             ` Kevin O'Connor
2013-08-14  9:19             ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-14  9:19               ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-14  9:56               ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-14  9:56                 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-14 10:54                 ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-14 10:54                   ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-14 11:16                   ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-14 11:16                     ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-08-14 11:21                     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-14 11:21                       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2013-08-16 13:59                       ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-16 13:59                         ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-14 12:29                   ` Kevin O'Connor
2013-08-14 12:29                     ` Kevin O'Connor
2013-08-14 12:50                     ` Fabio Fantoni
2013-08-14 12:50                       ` Fabio Fantoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=520A1407.1060301@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=fabio.fantoni@m2r.biz \
    --cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
    --cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=pkg-qemu-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=seabios@seabios.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.