All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] drivers: base: dynamic memory block creation
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:37:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520BF88C.6060202@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130814211454.GA17423@variantweb.net>

On 08/14/2013 02:14 PM, Seth Jennings wrote:
>> >An existing tool would not work
>> >with this patch (plus boot option) since it would not know how to
>> >show/hide things.  It lets_part_  of those existing tools get reused
>> >since they only have to be taught how to show/hide things.
>> >
>> >I'd find this really intriguing if you found a way to keep even the old
>> >tools working.  Instead of having an explicit show/hide, why couldn't
>> >you just create the entries on open(), for instance?
> Nathan and I talked about this and I'm not sure if sysfs would support
> such a thing, i.e. memory block creation when someone tried to cd into
> the memory block device config.  I wouldn't know where to start on that.
>

Also, I'd expect userspace tools might use readdir() to find out what 
memory blocks a system has (unless they just stat("memory0"), 
stat("memory1")...). I don't think filesystem tricks (at least within 
sysfs) are going to let this magically be solved without breaking the 
userspace API.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Cody P Schafer <cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] drivers: base: dynamic memory block creation
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2013 14:37:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <520BF88C.6060202@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130814211454.GA17423@variantweb.net>

On 08/14/2013 02:14 PM, Seth Jennings wrote:
>> >An existing tool would not work
>> >with this patch (plus boot option) since it would not know how to
>> >show/hide things.  It lets_part_  of those existing tools get reused
>> >since they only have to be taught how to show/hide things.
>> >
>> >I'd find this really intriguing if you found a way to keep even the old
>> >tools working.  Instead of having an explicit show/hide, why couldn't
>> >you just create the entries on open(), for instance?
> Nathan and I talked about this and I'm not sure if sysfs would support
> such a thing, i.e. memory block creation when someone tried to cd into
> the memory block device config.  I wouldn't know where to start on that.
>

Also, I'd expect userspace tools might use readdir() to find out what 
memory blocks a system has (unless they just stat("memory0"), 
stat("memory1")...). I don't think filesystem tricks (at least within 
sysfs) are going to let this magically be solved without breaking the 
userspace API.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-14 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-14 19:31 [RFC][PATCH] drivers: base: dynamic memory block creation Seth Jennings
2013-08-14 19:31 ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-14 19:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-14 19:40   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-16 19:07   ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-16 19:07     ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-14 19:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-14 19:43   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-14 20:05   ` Dave Hansen
2013-08-14 20:05     ` Dave Hansen
2013-08-14 20:35     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-14 20:35       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-14 21:16       ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-14 21:16         ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-14 21:37       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-14 21:52         ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-14 21:52           ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-14 23:20           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-14 23:20             ` Yinghai Lu
2013-08-15  2:12           ` Michael Ellerman
2013-08-15  2:12             ` Michael Ellerman
2013-08-15  2:12             ` Michael Ellerman
2013-08-14 20:40 ` Nathan Fontenot
2013-08-14 20:40   ` Nathan Fontenot
2013-08-14 20:47 ` Dave Hansen
2013-08-14 20:47   ` Dave Hansen
2013-08-14 21:14   ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-14 21:14     ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-14 21:36     ` Dave Hansen
2013-08-14 21:36       ` Dave Hansen
2013-08-14 21:37     ` Cody P Schafer [this message]
2013-08-14 21:37       ` Cody P Schafer
2013-08-14 21:49       ` Dave Hansen
2013-08-14 21:49         ` Dave Hansen
2013-08-15  0:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-15  0:01   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-16 18:41   ` Seth Jennings
2013-08-16 18:41     ` Seth Jennings

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=520BF88C.6060202@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=cody@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.