From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, ujhelyi.m@gmail.com,
mugunthanvnm@ti.com, vaibhav.bedia@ti.com, d-gerlach@ti.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: add optional third memory region for CONTROL module
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:12:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5216549E.1010305@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377171448-27924-3-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com>
Hello.
On 08/22/2013 03:37 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> At least the AM33xx SoC has a control module register to configure
> details such as the hardware ethernet interface mode.
> I'm not sure whether all SoCs which feature the cpsw block have such a
> register, so that third memory region is considered optional for now.
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt | 5 ++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt
> index 05d660e..4e5ca54 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 63feaae..4855d8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
[...]
> @@ -2012,6 +2013,27 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
> }
>
> + /* If the control memory region is unspecified, continue without it.
> + * If it is specified, but we're unable to reserve it, bail. */
According to Documentation/CodingStyle, the networking code's preferred
style of multi-line comments is this:
/* Bla
* bla
*/
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 2);
> + if (!res) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "error getting control i/o resource\n");
> + goto no_gmii_sel;
> + }
> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start, resource_size(res),
> + ndev->name)) {
Not dev_name(&pdev->dev)?
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "failed request control i/o region\n");
> + ret = -ENXIO;
Rather -EBUSY.
> + goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
> + }
> + priv->gmii_sel_reg = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> + resource_size(res));
> + if (!priv->gmii_sel_reg) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to map control i/o region\n");
> + goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
> + }
Why not use devm_ioremap_resource() instead of the above sequence?
> +
> +no_gmii_sel:
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: add optional third memory region for CONTROL module
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:12:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5216549E.1010305@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1377171448-27924-3-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com>
Hello.
On 08/22/2013 03:37 PM, Daniel Mack wrote:
> At least the AM33xx SoC has a control module register to configure
> details such as the hardware ethernet interface mode.
> I'm not sure whether all SoCs which feature the cpsw block have such a
> register, so that third memory region is considered optional for now.
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack <zonque@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt | 5 ++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt
> index 05d660e..4e5ca54 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cpsw.txt
[...]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> index 63feaae..4855d8e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
[...]
> @@ -2012,6 +2013,27 @@ static int cpsw_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
> }
>
> + /* If the control memory region is unspecified, continue without it.
> + * If it is specified, but we're unable to reserve it, bail. */
According to Documentation/CodingStyle, the networking code's preferred
style of multi-line comments is this:
/* Bla
* bla
*/
> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 2);
> + if (!res) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "error getting control i/o resource\n");
> + goto no_gmii_sel;
> + }
> + if (!devm_request_mem_region(&pdev->dev, res->start, resource_size(res),
> + ndev->name)) {
Not dev_name(&pdev->dev)?
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "failed request control i/o region\n");
> + ret = -ENXIO;
Rather -EBUSY.
> + goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
> + }
> + priv->gmii_sel_reg = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res->start,
> + resource_size(res));
> + if (!priv->gmii_sel_reg) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to map control i/o region\n");
> + goto clean_runtime_disable_ret;
> + }
Why not use devm_ioremap_resource() instead of the above sequence?
> +
> +no_gmii_sel:
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-22 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-22 11:37 [PATCH 0/4] cpsw: support for control module register Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 11:37 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 11:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: switch to devres allocations Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 11:37 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 11:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: add optional third memory region for CONTROL module Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 11:37 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 18:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2013-08-22 18:12 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-08-22 18:37 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 18:37 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 11:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] net: ethernet: cpsw: add support for hardware interface mode config Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 11:37 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 5:30 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 5:30 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 5:30 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-23 6:14 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-23 6:14 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-23 6:14 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-23 8:15 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 8:15 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 6:11 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-23 6:11 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-23 6:11 ` Mugunthan V N
2013-08-22 11:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: am33xx: add third memory region to cpsw block Daniel Mack
2013-08-22 11:37 ` Daniel Mack
2013-08-23 3:02 ` [PATCH 0/4] cpsw: support for control module register David Miller
2013-08-23 3:02 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5216549E.1010305@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=d-gerlach@ti.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mugunthanvnm@ti.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ujhelyi.m@gmail.com \
--cc=vaibhav.bedia@ti.com \
--cc=zonque@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.