Re: [PATCH 1/7] PCI: tegra: replace devm_request_and_ioremap by devm_ioremap_resource

[Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>]

On 08/27/2013 02:14 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:49:07PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Thierry Reding 
>> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 02:04:24PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 6:02 AM, Thierry Reding 
>>>> <thierry.reding@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Bjorn, how do you want to handle patches to the Tegra PCIe
>>>>> driver in the future? Do you want me to prepare a branch
>>>>> and pull from that or would you rather just take simple
>>>>> patches?
>>>> 
>>>> I'm in the habit of applying patches from email, so that's
>>>> easy for me.  But a branch would be OK, too.
>>> 
>>> Patches work for me too. Is this cleanup patch something that
>>> you'd be comfortable with applying after 3.12-rc1 or would you
>>> rather defer it to 3.13?
>> 
>> I'm not really sure how we should manage drivers/pci/host/*.
>> Those files are mostly arch code, and I'm not sure it's useful
>> for me to be in the middle of managing them.
>> 
>> I assume Stephen or somebody has a tree with the pci-tegra.c
>> stuff that's in -next right now; it seems like it'd be simplest
>> to just add this patch there and merge in during the v3.12 merge
>> window.
> 
> If Stephen's fine with it I suppose we could take pci-tegra.c
> driver changes through the Tegra tree. But I think it'd be good if
> we could still Cc you on patches so you're aware of what we're
> doing (that is the same for all drivers drivers/pci/host/*). And
> we're going to need your Acked-by on the patches as well.

I can push Tegra PCIe patches through the arm-soc tree before
3.12-rc1, but after that point, I think it's best if they go through
the PCIe tree, unless there's some cross-subsystem dependency for a
specific patch, and with the new PCIe driver, that's less likely.