From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
khilman@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: TC2: CPU idle big.LITTLE driver
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:13:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521F10C6.3000409@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130828183624.GH8607@quad.lixom.net>
On 08/28/2013 08:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:08:48AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> Hi Olof, Kevin,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:34:22PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> Hi Olof, Kevin,
>>>
>>> please pull this patch series that provides a CPU idle driver for the vexpress
>>> TC2 testchip, and it is a stepping stone towards an ARM unified CPU idle driver
>>> based on the MCPM framework.
>>>
>>> Series is based against this pull request from Pawel which is a strict
>>> dependency and they must be merged in order:
>>>
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-August/190067.html
>>
>> May I ask you please the status of this pull request ? It is to know if
>> it is ok as it is or I have to do something on my side, thanks.
>
> This needed a rebase on top of the latest version of the mcpm backend branch,
> since it's based on an older version.
>
> I also don't see an ack from any of the cpuidle maintainers, if you want to
> take it through arm-soc you need to get them to ack it for that purpose. I see
> that you got an informal "It sounds good to me" in
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg266442.html, but please be diligent
> in collecting these in the future.
Hi Olof,
there is my signed-off for the cpuidle patch because I wrote part of it
and Lorenzo finished it. This is why I thought it was not necessary to
add my acked-by.
> So, I've essentially applied the topmost 3 patches in a new branch that's based
> on our version of vexpress/mcpm, and merged that in.
Cool thanks !
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] ARM: TC2: CPU idle big.LITTLE driver
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:13:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521F10C6.3000409@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130828183624.GH8607@quad.lixom.net>
On 08/28/2013 08:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:08:48AM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> Hi Olof, Kevin,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 04:34:22PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>>> Hi Olof, Kevin,
>>>
>>> please pull this patch series that provides a CPU idle driver for the vexpress
>>> TC2 testchip, and it is a stepping stone towards an ARM unified CPU idle driver
>>> based on the MCPM framework.
>>>
>>> Series is based against this pull request from Pawel which is a strict
>>> dependency and they must be merged in order:
>>>
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2013-August/190067.html
>>
>> May I ask you please the status of this pull request ? It is to know if
>> it is ok as it is or I have to do something on my side, thanks.
>
> This needed a rebase on top of the latest version of the mcpm backend branch,
> since it's based on an older version.
>
> I also don't see an ack from any of the cpuidle maintainers, if you want to
> take it through arm-soc you need to get them to ack it for that purpose. I see
> that you got an informal "It sounds good to me" in
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg266442.html, but please be diligent
> in collecting these in the future.
Hi Olof,
there is my signed-off for the cpuidle patch because I wrote part of it
and Lorenzo finished it. This is why I thought it was not necessary to
add my acked-by.
> So, I've essentially applied the topmost 3 patches in a new branch that's based
> on our version of vexpress/mcpm, and merged that in.
Cool thanks !
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-29 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-12 15:34 [GIT PULL] ARM: TC2: CPU idle big.LITTLE driver Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-12 15:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-25 9:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-25 9:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-28 18:36 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-28 18:36 ` Olof Johansson
2013-08-29 9:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-29 9:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-29 9:13 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2013-08-29 9:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521F10C6.3000409@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.