From: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:24:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521F2F7E.8010702@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130829194741.ff75bb1ce06207d5d3a703de@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi Stephen,
08/29/2013 01:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell пишет:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig
> and others) produced these warnings:
>
> mm/page-writeback.c: In function 'balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited':
> mm/page-writeback.c:1450:13: warning: 'bdi_thresh' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> mm/page-writeback.c:1372:16: note: 'bdi_thresh' was declared here
> mm/page-writeback.c:1226:16: warning: 'bdi_dirty' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> mm/page-writeback.c:1369:16: note: 'bdi_dirty' was declared here
>
> Possibly introduced by commit 34c547af1e23 ("mm/page-writeback.c: add
> strictlimit feature"), but I am not sure anything can be done about them.
>
This looks as gcc glitch. So far as I didn't observe the warnings, the
version of gcc does matter. May be moving the definitions of the two
variables into for(;;){...} would help. Could you please give it a try?
Thanks,
Maxim
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-next@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 15:24:46 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521F2F7E.8010702@parallels.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130829194741.ff75bb1ce06207d5d3a703de@canb.auug.org.au>
Hi Stephen,
08/29/2013 01:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell пишет:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm tree, today's linux-next build (sparc64 defconfig
> and others) produced these warnings:
>
> mm/page-writeback.c: In function 'balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited':
> mm/page-writeback.c:1450:13: warning: 'bdi_thresh' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> mm/page-writeback.c:1372:16: note: 'bdi_thresh' was declared here
> mm/page-writeback.c:1226:16: warning: 'bdi_dirty' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> mm/page-writeback.c:1369:16: note: 'bdi_dirty' was declared here
>
> Possibly introduced by commit 34c547af1e23 ("mm/page-writeback.c: add
> strictlimit feature"), but I am not sure anything can be done about them.
>
This looks as gcc glitch. So far as I didn't observe the warnings, the
version of gcc does matter. May be moving the definitions of the two
variables into for(;;){...} would help. Could you please give it a try?
Thanks,
Maxim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-29 11:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 9:47 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the akpm-current tree Stephen Rothwell
2013-08-29 11:24 ` Maxim Patlasov [this message]
2013-08-29 11:24 ` Maxim Patlasov
2013-08-29 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-29 19:42 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-26 7:22 Stephen Rothwell
2014-08-26 10:19 ` Xishi Qiu
2014-08-26 10:19 ` Xishi Qiu
2014-09-23 8:18 Stephen Rothwell
2014-10-03 7:30 Stephen Rothwell
2014-10-03 18:21 ` Andrew Morton
2014-10-03 19:28 ` Michal Nazarewicz
2015-01-27 8:12 Stephen Rothwell
2015-01-27 8:27 ` Vladimir Davydov
2015-01-27 8:27 ` Vladimir Davydov
2017-03-20 5:22 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-20 9:05 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2017-03-20 12:30 ` Jan Glauber
2017-03-20 17:06 ` Challa, Mahipal
2017-08-24 7:41 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-24 8:15 ` Changwei Ge
2017-08-25 21:23 ` Andrew Morton
2017-08-26 1:23 ` Changwei Ge
2020-01-06 6:14 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-06 12:05 Stephen Rothwell
2020-10-06 20:01 ` Peter Xu
2020-10-06 22:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-06-15 10:50 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-11 7:31 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-11 17:46 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-09 6:02 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-09 16:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-03-28 23:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2022-03-29 3:32 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-03-24 7:27 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-03-28 19:54 ` Hugh Dickins
2022-03-28 22:10 ` Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521F2F7E.8010702@parallels.com \
--to=mpatlasov@parallels.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.