From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: paul@pwsan.com, tony@atomide.com, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com>,
bcousson@baylibre.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: OMAP4+: Move SRAM data to DT
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:14:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521F5052.90308@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521F4D41.4010303@ti.com>
On 8/29/2013 7:01 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2013 09:26 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On 8/29/2013 4:53 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>> index 22d9f2b..1ba6a77 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>> @@ -126,6 +126,11 @@
>>> pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0x7fff>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> + ocmcram: ocmcram@40304000 {
>>
>> This can now be changed to 0x40300000 now that you have moved to
>> gen_pool_alloc()?
>>
> NO.
> It won't work on secure devices since first 16 KB is occupied for
> default configuration. Its not worth trouble also to handle
> secure/non-secure considering the use of SRAM which is actually just
> limited to errata. 40304000 will work for both devices.
Okay, the same problem is not applicable to OMAP5 and other devices? I
am okay with this as such, may be just add a comment explaining why
there is an offset.
Thanks,
Sekhar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nsekhar@ti.com (Sekhar Nori)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: OMAP4+: Move SRAM data to DT
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:14:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <521F5052.90308@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <521F4D41.4010303@ti.com>
On 8/29/2013 7:01 PM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> On Thursday 29 August 2013 09:26 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On 8/29/2013 4:53 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>> index 22d9f2b..1ba6a77 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap4.dtsi
>>> @@ -126,6 +126,11 @@
>>> pinctrl-single,function-mask = <0x7fff>;
>>> };
>>>
>>> + ocmcram: ocmcram at 40304000 {
>>
>> This can now be changed to 0x40300000 now that you have moved to
>> gen_pool_alloc()?
>>
> NO.
> It won't work on secure devices since first 16 KB is occupied for
> default configuration. Its not worth trouble also to handle
> secure/non-secure considering the use of SRAM which is actually just
> limited to errata. 40304000 will work for both devices.
Okay, the same problem is not applicable to OMAP5 and other devices? I
am okay with this as such, may be just add a comment explaining why
there is an offset.
Thanks,
Sekhar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-29 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-29 11:23 [PATCH v2 0/3] OMAP4+: Get rid of internal SRAM handling Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 11:23 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 11:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] ARM: AM335x: Get rid of unused sram init function Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 11:23 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 11:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: OMAP4+: Move SRAM data to DT Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 11:23 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 13:26 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-29 13:26 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-29 13:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 13:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 13:44 ` Sekhar Nori [this message]
2013-08-29 13:44 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-29 13:48 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 13:48 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 13:50 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 13:50 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 13:51 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 13:51 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-09-02 17:03 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-09-02 17:03 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-09-03 13:37 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-09-03 13:37 ` Sekhar Nori
2013-08-29 11:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: OMAP4+: Remove static iotable mappings for SRAM Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 11:23 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 13:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 13:23 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 13:56 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 13:56 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-29 17:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-08-29 17:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-08-29 17:25 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 17:25 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-30 9:27 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-30 9:27 ` Rajendra Nayak
2013-08-30 14:39 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-08-30 14:39 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-08-30 14:41 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-30 14:41 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 13:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] OMAP4+: Get rid of internal SRAM handling Santosh Shilimkar
2013-08-29 13:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=521F5052.90308@ti.com \
--to=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.