From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 1/9] hwmon: Introduce hwmon_device_register_with_groups
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 17:55:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52237F96.2090008@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130901162441.GB32712@kroah.com>
On 09/01/2013 09:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This looks good, just one minor question about the
> non-driver-core-related code:
>
>> +struct device *
>> +hwmon_device_register_with_groups(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>> + void *drvdata,
>> + const struct attribute_group **groups)
>> {
>> - struct device *hwdev;
>> - int id;
>> + struct hwmon_device *hwdev;
>> + int err, id;
>>
>> id = ida_simple_get(&hwmon_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (id < 0)
>> return ERR_PTR(id);
>
> Don't you need a lock around the ida_simple_get call to ensure hwmon_ida
> is not being used at the same time twice? Or does the ida framework
> handle that ok?
>
ida_simple_get handles the locking as far as I can see. Other callers don't use
local locks either, so I guess it must be working.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] hwmon: Introduce hwmon_device_register_with_groups
Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2013 10:55:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52237F96.2090008@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130901162441.GB32712@kroah.com>
On 09/01/2013 09:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This looks good, just one minor question about the
> non-driver-core-related code:
>
>> +struct device *
>> +hwmon_device_register_with_groups(struct device *dev, const char *name,
>> + void *drvdata,
>> + const struct attribute_group **groups)
>> {
>> - struct device *hwdev;
>> - int id;
>> + struct hwmon_device *hwdev;
>> + int err, id;
>>
>> id = ida_simple_get(&hwmon_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (id < 0)
>> return ERR_PTR(id);
>
> Don't you need a lock around the ida_simple_get call to ensure hwmon_ida
> is not being used at the same time twice? Or does the ida framework
> handle that ok?
>
ida_simple_get handles the locking as far as I can see. Other callers don't use
local locks either, so I guess it must be working.
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-01 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-01 2:48 [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 0/9] Introduce hwmon_device_register_with_groups and Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 1/9] hwmon: Introduce hwmon_device_register_with_groups Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 16:24 ` [lm-sensors] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-09-01 16:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-09-01 17:55 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2013-09-01 17:55 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 18:01 ` [lm-sensors] " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-09-01 18:01 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-09-01 2:48 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 2/9] hwmon: (ds1621) Convert to use hwmon_device_register_with_groups Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 3/9] hwmon: (gpio-fan) " Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 4/9] hwmon: (ltc4245) " Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 5/9] hwmon: (pmbus) " Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 6/9] hwmon: (nct6775) " Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:48 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:49 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 7/9] hwmon: Provide managed hwmon registration Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:49 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 8/9] hwmon: (nct6775) Convert to use devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:49 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 9/9] hwmon: (ds1621) " Guenter Roeck
2013-09-01 2:49 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-02 19:25 ` [lm-sensors] [PATCH v2 0/9] Introduce hwmon_device_register_with_groups and Guenter Roeck
2013-09-02 19:25 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-03 15:27 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-09-03 15:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-09-14 18:31 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2013-09-14 18:31 ` Jean Delvare
2013-09-14 19:16 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-09-14 19:16 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52237F96.2090008@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.