From: George Cherian <george.cherian@ti.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@linaro.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
n.a.balandin@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] cleanup of gpio_pcf857x.c
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:50:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52243C4E.8000007@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a9jvsofz.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
On 9/2/2013 12:25 PM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry for my many response.
No Issues. and thanks for the review.
>> This patch series
>> - removes the irq_demux_work
>> - Uses devm_request_threaded_irq
>> - Call the user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done.
>>
>> v1 --> v2
>> Split v1 to 3 patches
>> v2 --> v3
>> Remove the unnecessary dts patches.
>>
>>
>> George Cherian (3):
>> gpio: pcf857x: change to devm_request_threaded_irq
>> gpio: pcf857x: remove the irq_demux_work
>> gpio: pcf857x: call the gpio user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> Basically, I have no objection about these patches,
> but I have 2 opinions
> - I guess we can merge #1 and #2 patches ?
> ("as is" is very OK for me though)
> - we don't need gpio->irq any more ?
> (additional patch is very OK for me)
I will sent one patch removing gpio->irq too.
>
> Best regards
> ---
> Kuninori Morimoto
--
-George
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: George Cherian <george.cherian@ti.com>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<n.a.balandin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] cleanup of gpio_pcf857x.c
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2013 12:50:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52243C4E.8000007@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a9jvsofz.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
On 9/2/2013 12:25 PM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi
>
> Sorry for my many response.
No Issues. and thanks for the review.
>> This patch series
>> - removes the irq_demux_work
>> - Uses devm_request_threaded_irq
>> - Call the user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done.
>>
>> v1 --> v2
>> Split v1 to 3 patches
>> v2 --> v3
>> Remove the unnecessary dts patches.
>>
>>
>> George Cherian (3):
>> gpio: pcf857x: change to devm_request_threaded_irq
>> gpio: pcf857x: remove the irq_demux_work
>> gpio: pcf857x: call the gpio user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-pcf857x.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> Basically, I have no objection about these patches,
> but I have 2 opinions
> - I guess we can merge #1 and #2 patches ?
> ("as is" is very OK for me though)
> - we don't need gpio->irq any more ?
> (additional patch is very OK for me)
I will sent one patch removing gpio->irq too.
>
> Best regards
> ---
> Kuninori Morimoto
--
-George
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-02 2:30 [PATCH v3 0/3] cleanup of gpio_pcf857x.c George Cherian
2013-09-02 2:30 ` George Cherian
2013-09-02 2:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] gpio: pcf857x: change to devm_request_threaded_irq George Cherian
2013-09-02 2:30 ` George Cherian
2013-09-02 2:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] gpio: pcf857x: remove the irq_demux_work George Cherian
2013-09-02 2:30 ` George Cherian
2013-09-02 2:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] gpio: pcf857x: call the gpio user handler iff gpio_to_irq is done George Cherian
2013-09-02 2:30 ` George Cherian
2013-09-02 6:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] cleanup of gpio_pcf857x.c Kuninori Morimoto
2013-09-02 7:20 ` George Cherian [this message]
2013-09-02 7:20 ` George Cherian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52243C4E.8000007@ti.com \
--to=george.cherian@ti.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=n.a.balandin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.