All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Cookson <it@sca-uk.com>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)@casper.infradead.org
Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hauppauge ImpactVCB-e 01381 PCIe driver resolution.
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 14:33:14 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <523740DA.2000107@sca-uk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGoCfiyuvXAhBS=n=_3bZKnCSTZYMrHFJ73MfRnoiuW44Y=zKg@mail.gmail.com>


Hi Devin,

Thanks for responding.

So my question would be then, is it worth fixing?

I can't find any PCIe cards that give me a reasonable quality.

If I use an external card like the Dazzle it seems quite fast and better 
quality than many s-video cards.

Could the ImpactVCB-e be better than the Dazzle?

Regards

Steve.



On 15/09/2013 17:26, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
 >
 >
 > On Sep 15, 2013 11:35 AM, "Steve Cookson" <it@sca-uk.com> wrote:
 > >
 > > Hi Guys,
 > >
 > > I seem to be having immense difficulty getting the Hauppauge 
ImpactVCB-e 01381 PCIe card working on Linux (I'm using Kubuntu 13.04) 
with greater than 320x240 resolution.
 > >
 > > This is what I've done:
 > >
 > > lspci recognises the card but only as a Conexant card (Vendor ID = 
14f1:8852), not Hauppauge card (Vendor ID = 0070). Hauppauge is shown as 
the subsystem (0070:7133).  I don't really know what this means.
 > >
 > > lsmod returns nothing related to the card.
 > >
 > > dmesg  | grep cx23885 suggested card=<n> insmod option (full output 
from dmesg below).  So I did:
 > >
 > > echo cx23885 card=5 | sudo tee -a /etc/modules
 > >
 > > So I tried a few version numbers, but they all give me 320x240 in 
s-video or composite mode.
 > >
 > > If I use a Pinnacle Dazzle, I get perfect 640x480 for about the 
same price.  But I need an internal PCIe card, rather than a external 
card/box.
 > >
 > > How can I add the card to video4Linux?
 > >
 > > Any help much appreciated.
 > >
 > > Regards
 > >
 > l believe the scaler is broken in the cx23885 driver.  I did a bunch 
of work on the driver last year to fix a variety of bugs, but didn't get 
around to making the scaler work properly.  Most likely the card only 
works right at it's max resolution (720x480 for NTSC or 720x576 for PAL).
 >
 > It can probably be made to work with a few hour's worth of debugging, 
but I didn't have a commercial customer at the time who needed it and as 
far as I know nobody else is working on it.
 >
 > Devin


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-16 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-15 15:14 Hauppauge ImpactVCB-e 01381 PCIe driver resolution Steve Cookson
     [not found] ` <CAGoCfiyuvXAhBS=n=_3bZKnCSTZYMrHFJ73MfRnoiuW44Y=zKg@mail.gmail.com>
2013-09-16 17:33   ` Steve Cookson [this message]
     [not found]   ` <52363EA6.7060402@sca-uk.com>
2013-09-16 17:38     ` Devin Heitmueller
2013-09-16 19:13       ` Steve Cookson
2013-09-16 22:04         ` Devin Heitmueller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=523740DA.2000107@sca-uk.com \
    --to=it@sca-uk.com \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.