From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
To: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: remove unused Kconfig parameters
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:26:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52385893.6000802@uclinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5237C726.9070002@free-electrons.com>
Hi Michael,
On 17/09/13 13:06, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 01:48 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> On 06/09/13 21:59, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>>> This patch proposes to remove the UC5282 and UC5272 kernel configuration
>>> parameters defined in arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine,
>>> but used nowhere in the makefiles and source code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
>> This change is a subset of c065edde ("remove 16 unused boards in
>> Kconfig.machine") by Pauk Bolle. And that is in 3.12-rc1.
> Awesome! Thank you very much for the good news, and for not applying the
> same change twice. Pfooh, this would have created anti-kconfig
> parameters. Scary. ;)
That would be scary :-)
Regards
Greg
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@uclinux.org>
To: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: remove unused Kconfig parameters
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:26:43 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52385893.6000802@uclinux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5237C726.9070002@free-electrons.com>
Hi Michael,
On 17/09/13 13:06, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
> On 09/17/2013 01:48 AM, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> On 06/09/13 21:59, Michael Opdenacker wrote:
>>> This patch proposes to remove the UC5282 and UC5272 kernel configuration
>>> parameters defined in arch/m68k/Kconfig.machine,
>>> but used nowhere in the makefiles and source code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker <michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com>
>> This change is a subset of c065edde ("remove 16 unused boards in
>> Kconfig.machine") by Pauk Bolle. And that is in 3.12-rc1.
> Awesome! Thank you very much for the good news, and for not applying the
> same change twice. Pfooh, this would have created anti-kconfig
> parameters. Scary. ;)
That would be scary :-)
Regards
Greg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-17 13:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-06 11:59 [PATCH] m68k: remove unused Kconfig parameters Michael Opdenacker
2013-09-06 11:59 ` Michael Opdenacker
2013-09-16 23:48 ` Greg Ungerer
2013-09-16 23:48 ` Greg Ungerer
2013-09-17 3:06 ` Michael Opdenacker
2013-09-17 3:06 ` Michael Opdenacker
2013-09-17 13:26 ` Greg Ungerer [this message]
2013-09-17 13:26 ` Greg Ungerer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52385893.6000802@uclinux.org \
--to=gerg@uclinux.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
--cc=michael.opdenacker@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.