From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: rusty@au1.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: do not relay a previous driver's WCE configuration to the current
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 12:28:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523C234D.2020003@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130920095424.GD2800@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>
Il 20/09/2013 11:54, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> Am 19.09.2013 um 18:48 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
>> The following sequence happens:
>> - the SeaBIOS virtio-blk driver does not support the WCE feature, which
>> causes QEMU to disable writeback caching
>>
>> - the Linux virtio-blk driver resets the device, finds WCE is available
>> but writeback caching is disabled; tells block layer to not send cache
>> flush commands
>>
>> - the Linux virtio-blk driver sets the DRIVER_OK bit, which causes
>> writeback caching to be re-enabled, but the Linux virtio-blk driver does
>> not know of this side effect and cache flushes remain disabled
>>
>> The bug is at the third step. If the guest does know about CONFIG_WCE,
>> QEMU should ignore the WCE feature's state. The guest will control the
>> cache mode solely using configuration space. This change makes Linux
>> do flushes correctly, but Linux will keep SeaBIOS's writethrough mode.
>
> This sounds fishy. The solutions happens to make recent Linux kernels do
> the right thing, but wouldn't drivers that don't know CONFIG_WCE still
> fall into the same trap?
No, drivers that don't know CONFIG_WCE will do the following:
1) -drive cache=writethrough case, WCE supported
When the driver resets the device, QEMU disables the write cache
(virtio_blk_reset). Thus VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is not advertised.
The Linux virtio-blk driver tells the block layer to not send
cache flush commands, which is correct because they are useless.
VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is obviously not negotiated, and
virtio_blk_set_status confirms the disk in writethrough mode.
2) -drive cache=writeback case, WCE supported
When the driver resets the device, QEMU disables the write cache
(virtio_blk_reset). Thus VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is advertised by the
device and negotiated by the driver. The Linux virtio-blk driver
recognizes that VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is negotiated and tells the block
layer to send cache flush commands. virtio_blk_set_status confirms
the disk in writeback mode.
3) -drive cache=writethrough case, WCE not supported
When the driver resets the device, QEMU disables the write cache
(virtio_blk_reset). Thus VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is not advertised.
The virtio-blk driver doesn't do anything.
virtio_blk_set_status confirms the disk in writethrough mode.
4) -drive cache=writeback case, WCE not supported
When the driver resets the device, QEMU disables the write cache
(virtio_blk_reset). Thus VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is advertised by the
device, but not negotiated by the driver.
The virtio-blk driver doesn't do anything.
virtio_blk_set_status places the disk in writethrough mode.
> I guess making a host feature flag dynamic was
> a bad idea to start with.
I disagree, it is very useful. The bug was unfortunate indeed, and
probably happened due to testing the two patches (CONFIG_WCE and
no-WCE-implies-writethrough) independently rather than together.
> Perhaps we should restrict the magic to disabling WCE in case the guest
> doesn't have VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE, but never allow it to enable WCE even
> though we've already advertised that the host doesn't have WCE.
That's already what happens, because (thanks to the new
"bdrv_set_enable_write_cache(s->bs, s->original_wce);" at reset time)
VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE is never exposed in writethrough mode.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-20 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-19 16:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Serious bugs in the handling of writeback caching Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-19 16:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] blockdev: do not default cache.no-flush to true Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-19 17:33 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-19 16:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] virtio-blk: do not relay a previous driver's WCE configuration to the current Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-19 17:42 ` Eric Blake
2013-09-20 9:54 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-09-20 10:28 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-09-20 15:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 " Paolo Bonzini
2013-09-20 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Serious bugs in the handling of writeback caching Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523C234D.2020003@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=rusty@au1.ibm.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.