From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, marex@denx.de,
fabio.estevam@freescale.com,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: provide devicetree adaption
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:42:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523D943D.705@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379593369-22010-8-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de>
The device tree list has moved, so I've changed the cc.
Few comments inline. Basically I'd go for longer more
descriptive names when the abreviation isn't a really
well known common one.
Note I'm not all that familiar with device tree conventions
so may be barking up the wrong tree ;)
On 09/19/13 13:22, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> This is an RFC for the new touchscreen properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> CC: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
> CC: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> CC: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
> .../bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt | 36 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 57 ++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt
> index 4688205..ee05dc3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
> * Freescale i.MX28 LRADC device driver
>
> Required properties:
> -- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx28-lradc"
> +- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx23-lradc" for i.MX23 SoC and "fsl,imx28-lradc"
> + for i.MX28 SoC
> - reg: Address and length of the register set for the device
> - interrupts: Should contain the LRADC interrupts
>
> @@ -9,13 +10,38 @@ Optional properties:
> - fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires: Number of wires used to connect the touchscreen
> to LRADC. Valid value is either 4 or 5. If this
> property is not present, then the touchscreen is
> - disabled.
Do we want that lradc prefix on these other properties?
> + disabled. 5 wires is valid for i.MX28 SoC only.
> +- fsl,ave-ctrl: number of samples per direction to calculate an average value.
> + Allowed value is 1 ... 31, default is 4
This naming seems less than informative, what about fsl,average_num_samples of average_count
(ave isn't all that obvious an abrevaition of average).
> +- fsl,ave-delay: delay between consecutive samples. Allowed value is
> + 1 ... 2047. It is used if 'fsl,ave-ctrl' > 1, counts at
> + 2 kHz and its default is 2 (= 1 ms)
fsl,average_intersample_delay (I assume any limit of device tree property names is longer than that?)
> +- fsl,settling: delay between plate switch to next sample. Allowed value is
> + 1 ... 2047. It counts at 2 kHz and its default is
> + 10 (= 5 ms)
>
> -Examples:
> +Example for i.MX23 SoC:
> +
> + lradc@80050000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx23-lradc";
> + reg = <0x80050000 0x2000>;
> + interrupts = <36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44>;
> + status = "okay";
> + fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires = <4>;
> + fsl,ave-ctrl = <4>;
> + fsl,ave-delay = <2>;
> + fsl,settling = <10>;
> + };
> +
> +Example for i.MX28 SoC:
>
> lradc@80050000 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx28-lradc";
> reg = <0x80050000 0x2000>;
> - interrupts = <10 14 15 16 17 18 19
> - 20 21 22 23 24 25>;
> + interrupts = <10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25>;
> + status = "okay";
> + fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires = <5>;
> + fsl,ave-ctrl = <4>;
> + fsl,ave-delay = <2>;
> + fsl,settling = <10>;
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> index 122475f..ffcb0dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -1225,10 +1225,45 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mxs_lradc_dt_ids);
> static int mxs_lradc_probe_touchscreen(struct mxs_lradc *lradc,
> struct device_node *lradc_node)
> {
> - /* TODO retrieve from device tree */
> + int ret;
> + u32 ts_wires = 0, adapt;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires",
> + &ts_wires);
> + if (ret)
> + return -ENODEV; /* touchscreen feature disabled */
> +
> + switch (ts_wires) {
> + case 4:
> + lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_4WIRE;
> + break;
> + case 5:
> + if (lradc->soc == IMX28_LRADC) {
> + lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_5WIRE;
> + break;
> + }
> + /* fall through an error message for i.MX23 */
> + default:
> + dev_err(lradc->dev,
> + "Unsupported number of touchscreen wires (%d)\n",
> + ts_wires);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> lradc->over_sample_cnt = 4;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,ave-ctrl", &adapt);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + lradc->over_sample_cnt = adapt;
> +
> lradc->over_sample_delay = 2;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,ave-delay", &adapt);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + lradc->over_sample_delay = adapt;
> +
> lradc->settling_delay = 10;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,settling", &adapt);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + lradc->settling_delay = adapt;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1244,7 +1279,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct mxs_lradc *lradc;
> struct iio_dev *iio;
> struct resource *iores;
> - uint32_t ts_wires = 0;
> int ret = 0, touch_ret;
> int i;
>
> @@ -1267,25 +1301,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> touch_ret = mxs_lradc_probe_touchscreen(lradc, node);
>
> - /* Check if touchscreen is enabled in DT. */
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires",
> - &ts_wires);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_info(dev, "Touchscreen not enabled.\n");
> - else if (ts_wires == 4)
> - lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_4WIRE;
> - else if (ts_wires == 5)
> - lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_5WIRE;
> - else
> - dev_warn(dev, "Unsupported number of touchscreen wires (%d)\n",
> - ts_wires);
> -
> - if ((lradc->soc == IMX23_LRADC) && (ts_wires == 5)) {
> - dev_warn(dev, "No support for 5 wire touches on i.MX23\n");
> - dev_warn(dev, "Falling back to 4 wire\n");
> - ts_wires = 4;
> - }
> -
> /* Grab all IRQ sources */
> for (i = 0; i < of_cfg->irq_count; i++) {
> lradc->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: jic23@kernel.org (Jonathan Cameron)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: provide devicetree adaption
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:42:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523D943D.705@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379593369-22010-8-git-send-email-jbe@pengutronix.de>
The device tree list has moved, so I've changed the cc.
Few comments inline. Basically I'd go for longer more
descriptive names when the abreviation isn't a really
well known common one.
Note I'm not all that familiar with device tree conventions
so may be barking up the wrong tree ;)
On 09/19/13 13:22, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> This is an RFC for the new touchscreen properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe@pengutronix.de>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> CC: devel at driverdev.osuosl.org
> CC: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>
> CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@cam.ac.uk>
> CC: devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
> .../bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt | 36 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 57 ++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt
> index 4688205..ee05dc3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
> * Freescale i.MX28 LRADC device driver
>
> Required properties:
> -- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx28-lradc"
> +- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx23-lradc" for i.MX23 SoC and "fsl,imx28-lradc"
> + for i.MX28 SoC
> - reg: Address and length of the register set for the device
> - interrupts: Should contain the LRADC interrupts
>
> @@ -9,13 +10,38 @@ Optional properties:
> - fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires: Number of wires used to connect the touchscreen
> to LRADC. Valid value is either 4 or 5. If this
> property is not present, then the touchscreen is
> - disabled.
Do we want that lradc prefix on these other properties?
> + disabled. 5 wires is valid for i.MX28 SoC only.
> +- fsl,ave-ctrl: number of samples per direction to calculate an average value.
> + Allowed value is 1 ... 31, default is 4
This naming seems less than informative, what about fsl,average_num_samples of average_count
(ave isn't all that obvious an abrevaition of average).
> +- fsl,ave-delay: delay between consecutive samples. Allowed value is
> + 1 ... 2047. It is used if 'fsl,ave-ctrl' > 1, counts at
> + 2 kHz and its default is 2 (= 1 ms)
fsl,average_intersample_delay (I assume any limit of device tree property names is longer than that?)
> +- fsl,settling: delay between plate switch to next sample. Allowed value is
> + 1 ... 2047. It counts at 2 kHz and its default is
> + 10 (= 5 ms)
>
> -Examples:
> +Example for i.MX23 SoC:
> +
> + lradc at 80050000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx23-lradc";
> + reg = <0x80050000 0x2000>;
> + interrupts = <36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44>;
> + status = "okay";
> + fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires = <4>;
> + fsl,ave-ctrl = <4>;
> + fsl,ave-delay = <2>;
> + fsl,settling = <10>;
> + };
> +
> +Example for i.MX28 SoC:
>
> lradc at 80050000 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx28-lradc";
> reg = <0x80050000 0x2000>;
> - interrupts = <10 14 15 16 17 18 19
> - 20 21 22 23 24 25>;
> + interrupts = <10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25>;
> + status = "okay";
> + fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires = <5>;
> + fsl,ave-ctrl = <4>;
> + fsl,ave-delay = <2>;
> + fsl,settling = <10>;
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> index 122475f..ffcb0dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -1225,10 +1225,45 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mxs_lradc_dt_ids);
> static int mxs_lradc_probe_touchscreen(struct mxs_lradc *lradc,
> struct device_node *lradc_node)
> {
> - /* TODO retrieve from device tree */
> + int ret;
> + u32 ts_wires = 0, adapt;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires",
> + &ts_wires);
> + if (ret)
> + return -ENODEV; /* touchscreen feature disabled */
> +
> + switch (ts_wires) {
> + case 4:
> + lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_4WIRE;
> + break;
> + case 5:
> + if (lradc->soc == IMX28_LRADC) {
> + lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_5WIRE;
> + break;
> + }
> + /* fall through an error message for i.MX23 */
> + default:
> + dev_err(lradc->dev,
> + "Unsupported number of touchscreen wires (%d)\n",
> + ts_wires);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> lradc->over_sample_cnt = 4;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,ave-ctrl", &adapt);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + lradc->over_sample_cnt = adapt;
> +
> lradc->over_sample_delay = 2;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,ave-delay", &adapt);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + lradc->over_sample_delay = adapt;
> +
> lradc->settling_delay = 10;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,settling", &adapt);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + lradc->settling_delay = adapt;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1244,7 +1279,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct mxs_lradc *lradc;
> struct iio_dev *iio;
> struct resource *iores;
> - uint32_t ts_wires = 0;
> int ret = 0, touch_ret;
> int i;
>
> @@ -1267,25 +1301,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> touch_ret = mxs_lradc_probe_touchscreen(lradc, node);
>
> - /* Check if touchscreen is enabled in DT. */
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires",
> - &ts_wires);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_info(dev, "Touchscreen not enabled.\n");
> - else if (ts_wires == 4)
> - lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_4WIRE;
> - else if (ts_wires == 5)
> - lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_5WIRE;
> - else
> - dev_warn(dev, "Unsupported number of touchscreen wires (%d)\n",
> - ts_wires);
> -
> - if ((lradc->soc == IMX23_LRADC) && (ts_wires == 5)) {
> - dev_warn(dev, "No support for 5 wire touches on i.MX23\n");
> - dev_warn(dev, "Falling back to 4 wire\n");
> - ts_wires = 4;
> - }
> -
> /* Grab all IRQ sources */
> for (i = 0; i < of_cfg->irq_count; i++) {
> lradc->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Juergen Beisert <jbe-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-iio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org,
fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: provide devicetree adaption
Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2013 13:42:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <523D943D.705@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1379593369-22010-8-git-send-email-jbe-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
The device tree list has moved, so I've changed the cc.
Few comments inline. Basically I'd go for longer more
descriptive names when the abreviation isn't a really
well known common one.
Note I'm not all that familiar with device tree conventions
so may be barking up the wrong tree ;)
On 09/19/13 13:22, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> This is an RFC for the new touchscreen properties.
>
> Signed-off-by: Juergen Beisert <jbe-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> CC: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
> CC: devel-gWbeCf7V1WCQmaza687I9mD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org
> CC: Marek Vasut <marex-ynQEQJNshbs@public.gmane.org>
> CC: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
> CC: Jonathan Cameron <jic23-KWPb1pKIrIJaa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org>
> CC: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
> ---
> .../bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt | 36 ++++++++++++--
> drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 57 ++++++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt
> index 4688205..ee05dc3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.txt
> @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
> * Freescale i.MX28 LRADC device driver
>
> Required properties:
> -- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx28-lradc"
> +- compatible: Should be "fsl,imx23-lradc" for i.MX23 SoC and "fsl,imx28-lradc"
> + for i.MX28 SoC
> - reg: Address and length of the register set for the device
> - interrupts: Should contain the LRADC interrupts
>
> @@ -9,13 +10,38 @@ Optional properties:
> - fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires: Number of wires used to connect the touchscreen
> to LRADC. Valid value is either 4 or 5. If this
> property is not present, then the touchscreen is
> - disabled.
Do we want that lradc prefix on these other properties?
> + disabled. 5 wires is valid for i.MX28 SoC only.
> +- fsl,ave-ctrl: number of samples per direction to calculate an average value.
> + Allowed value is 1 ... 31, default is 4
This naming seems less than informative, what about fsl,average_num_samples of average_count
(ave isn't all that obvious an abrevaition of average).
> +- fsl,ave-delay: delay between consecutive samples. Allowed value is
> + 1 ... 2047. It is used if 'fsl,ave-ctrl' > 1, counts at
> + 2 kHz and its default is 2 (= 1 ms)
fsl,average_intersample_delay (I assume any limit of device tree property names is longer than that?)
> +- fsl,settling: delay between plate switch to next sample. Allowed value is
> + 1 ... 2047. It counts at 2 kHz and its default is
> + 10 (= 5 ms)
>
> -Examples:
> +Example for i.MX23 SoC:
> +
> + lradc@80050000 {
> + compatible = "fsl,imx23-lradc";
> + reg = <0x80050000 0x2000>;
> + interrupts = <36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44>;
> + status = "okay";
> + fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires = <4>;
> + fsl,ave-ctrl = <4>;
> + fsl,ave-delay = <2>;
> + fsl,settling = <10>;
> + };
> +
> +Example for i.MX28 SoC:
>
> lradc@80050000 {
> compatible = "fsl,imx28-lradc";
> reg = <0x80050000 0x2000>;
> - interrupts = <10 14 15 16 17 18 19
> - 20 21 22 23 24 25>;
> + interrupts = <10 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25>;
> + status = "okay";
> + fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires = <5>;
> + fsl,ave-ctrl = <4>;
> + fsl,ave-delay = <2>;
> + fsl,settling = <10>;
> };
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> index 122475f..ffcb0dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -1225,10 +1225,45 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mxs_lradc_dt_ids);
> static int mxs_lradc_probe_touchscreen(struct mxs_lradc *lradc,
> struct device_node *lradc_node)
> {
> - /* TODO retrieve from device tree */
> + int ret;
> + u32 ts_wires = 0, adapt;
> +
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires",
> + &ts_wires);
> + if (ret)
> + return -ENODEV; /* touchscreen feature disabled */
> +
> + switch (ts_wires) {
> + case 4:
> + lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_4WIRE;
> + break;
> + case 5:
> + if (lradc->soc == IMX28_LRADC) {
> + lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_5WIRE;
> + break;
> + }
> + /* fall through an error message for i.MX23 */
> + default:
> + dev_err(lradc->dev,
> + "Unsupported number of touchscreen wires (%d)\n",
> + ts_wires);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> lradc->over_sample_cnt = 4;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,ave-ctrl", &adapt);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + lradc->over_sample_cnt = adapt;
> +
> lradc->over_sample_delay = 2;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,ave-delay", &adapt);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + lradc->over_sample_delay = adapt;
> +
> lradc->settling_delay = 10;
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(lradc_node, "fsl,settling", &adapt);
> + if (ret == 0)
> + lradc->settling_delay = adapt;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -1244,7 +1279,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct mxs_lradc *lradc;
> struct iio_dev *iio;
> struct resource *iores;
> - uint32_t ts_wires = 0;
> int ret = 0, touch_ret;
> int i;
>
> @@ -1267,25 +1301,6 @@ static int mxs_lradc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> touch_ret = mxs_lradc_probe_touchscreen(lradc, node);
>
> - /* Check if touchscreen is enabled in DT. */
> - ret = of_property_read_u32(node, "fsl,lradc-touchscreen-wires",
> - &ts_wires);
> - if (ret)
> - dev_info(dev, "Touchscreen not enabled.\n");
> - else if (ts_wires == 4)
> - lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_4WIRE;
> - else if (ts_wires == 5)
> - lradc->use_touchscreen = MXS_LRADC_TOUCHSCREEN_5WIRE;
> - else
> - dev_warn(dev, "Unsupported number of touchscreen wires (%d)\n",
> - ts_wires);
> -
> - if ((lradc->soc == IMX23_LRADC) && (ts_wires == 5)) {
> - dev_warn(dev, "No support for 5 wire touches on i.MX23\n");
> - dev_warn(dev, "Falling back to 4 wire\n");
> - ts_wires = 4;
> - }
> -
> /* Grab all IRQ sources */
> for (i = 0; i < of_cfg->irq_count; i++) {
> lradc->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-21 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-19 12:22 [PATCHv5] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 1/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: distinguish i.MX23's and i.MX28's LRADC Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 2/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: separate i.MX28 specific register bits Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: simplify register access Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add i.MX23 support to the LRADC touchscreen driver Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 5/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: add interrupt driven touch detection Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-21 12:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-21 12:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 6/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: Remove old touchscreen detection implementation Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] Staging/iio/adc/touchscreen/MXS: provide devicetree adaption Juergen Beisert
2013-09-19 12:22 ` Juergen Beisert
2013-09-21 12:42 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2013-09-21 12:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-21 12:42 ` Jonathan Cameron
2013-09-23 7:42 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 7:42 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 7:42 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-22 23:55 ` [PATCHv5] staging/iio/adc: change the MXS touchscreen driver implementation Marek Vasut
2013-09-22 23:55 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-23 7:55 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 7:55 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 9:25 ` Lothar Waßmann
2013-09-23 9:25 ` Lothar Waßmann
2013-09-23 10:35 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 10:35 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 10:36 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-23 10:36 ` Marek Vasut
2013-09-23 11:57 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 11:57 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 12:12 ` Lothar Waßmann
2013-09-23 12:12 ` Lothar Waßmann
2013-09-23 13:24 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 13:24 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 13:40 ` Lothar Waßmann
2013-09-23 13:40 ` Lothar Waßmann
2013-09-23 14:05 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 14:05 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 13:40 ` Jürgen Beisert
2013-09-23 13:40 ` Jürgen Beisert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=523D943D.705@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=jbe@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.