All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>
Cc: "linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: palmas: do not abort pin configuration for BIAS_DEFAULT
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 17:08:20 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5246BFAC.5020306@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5245AD0C.7070206@wwwdotorg.org>

On Friday 27 September 2013 09:36 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/27/2013 07:30 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> On Thursday 26 September 2013 09:08 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> On 09/26/2013 06:48 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>> Recent movement of all configurations of pin in the single call of
>>>> pin_config_set(), it is aborting configuration if BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT
>>>> is selected as return of configuration.
>>>>
>>>> The original idea was to just avoid any update on register for pull
>>>> up/down
>>>> configuration if this option is selected.
>>> That doesn't sound correct. If a config option is specified in DT or the
>>> mapping table, it should be applied to HW. If someone doesn't want a
>>> particular config option applied, then it simply shouldn't be mentioned
>>> in DT or the mapping table.
>>>
>>> IIUC, BIAS_DEFAULT should be used only on HW where there is a concept of
>>> a true default bias, and in that case, that is what should be applied.
>>>
>> Hmm.. When I added the PIN_DEFAULT, I just though that do not update
>> anything in the register and implemented like that.
>> There is nothing "default" option in HW.
> The description of that pinconfig option is:
>
>> 7970cb77 (Heiko Stübner    2013-06-06 16:44:25 +0200  43)  * @PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_PIN_DEFAULT: the pin will be pulled up or down based
>> 70637a6d (Heiko Stübner    2013-06-25 14:55:42 +0200  44)  *    on embedded knowledge of the controller hardware, like current mux
>> 70637a6d (Heiko Stübner    2013-06-25 14:55:42 +0200  45)  *    function. The pull direction and possibly strength too will normally
>> 70637a6d (Heiko Stübner    2013-06-25 14:55:42 +0200  46)  *    be decided completely inside the hardware block and not be readable
>> 70637a6d (Heiko Stübner    2013-06-25 14:55:42 +0200  47)  *    from the kernel side.
>> 5ca3353b (Linus Walleij    2013-06-16 12:43:06 +0200  48)  *    If the argument is != 0 pull up/down is enabled, if it is 0, the
>> 5ca3353b (Linus Walleij    2013-06-16 12:43:06 +0200  49)  *    configuration is ignored. The proper way to disable it is to use
>> 5ca3353b (Linus Walleij    2013-06-16 12:43:06 +0200  50)  *    @PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE.
> If the HW doesn't support any concept of a default pull, I think the
> driver shouldn't support that option; it should return an error if asked
> to program it.

Yes, I will remove this option as I have not seen default option for pins.

>
>
> But what made you come across this issue? Is some pin mapping table or
> DT pinctrl node actually using that value? If so, then presumably that
> needs to be fixed, as well as removing driver support for that option.

When referring the code for the AMSAS3722 pincontrol driver, I just 
found that it is breaking the earlier code.

Removing this option makes more reasonable here and will post the next 
patch.


  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-28 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-26 12:48 [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: palmas: do not abort pin configuration for BIAS_DEFAULT Laxman Dewangan
2013-09-26 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: palmas: remove non-require function Laxman Dewangan
2013-09-27 13:53   ` Linus Walleij
2013-09-26 15:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: palmas: do not abort pin configuration for BIAS_DEFAULT Stephen Warren
2013-09-27 13:30   ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-09-27 16:06     ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-28 11:38       ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2013-10-02 10:40       ` Linus Walleij
2013-10-02 11:10         ` Laxman Dewangan
2013-10-02 11:20         ` Heiko Stübner
2013-10-02 16:10         ` Stephen Warren
2013-09-27 14:25 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5246BFAC.5020306@nvidia.com \
    --to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.