All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Qemu-devel] CPU Benchmark qemu-kvm 1.2.0 Win XP vs. Win 7
@ 2013-10-04  7:35 Erik Rull
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Erik Rull @ 2013-10-04  7:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hi all,

when testing my first Windows 7 guest, I noticed, that the IRQ load / 
kernel time within the guest is quite high when having network access. I 
use the virtio drivers - the same version as in the Windows XP guests. 
There the kernel load is nearly only 50% of the Win7 load. Why? The 
provided guest hardware is exactly the same... Win XP was used without 
ACPI, Win7 requires it - so it is enabled on both commandlines. But I can't 
imagine that this causes such a huge performance drop.

Additionally I did some CPU benchmarking and the Win7 guest results in ~ 
20% less in the hard/wetstone performance. Also the harddisk access is slower.

Any ideas what may cause the pure hardware performance degradation between 
these two guests when having the same qemu-kvm hardware parameters (beside 
the image file of course)? Any hints what to do to improve the performance 
for Win7 would be appreciated.

I would at least assume that the pure CPU performance would not drop 
significantly.

Thanks.

Best regards,

Erik

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-10-04  7:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-04  7:35 [Qemu-devel] CPU Benchmark qemu-kvm 1.2.0 Win XP vs. Win 7 Erik Rull

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.