From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: TI: always register sensor driver with core thermal framework
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:25:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524F0802.3070004@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466554.jrelSVKzU4@amdc1032>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4285 bytes --]
On 04-10-2013 08:40, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> There is little sense in having separate config option for
> registering the sensor driver with the core thermal framework.
> Fix it by integrating TI_THERMAL config option with TI_SOC_THERMAL
> one.
I am a bit confused of what is exactly wrong or needs fixing. The code
organization is so that the file ti-bandgap.c adds the support for TI
Bandgap IP. It is not aware of thermal framework. And the
ti-thermal-common.c file is expected to talk to thermal framework. Can
you please elaborate a bit more why this split is hurting you?
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig | 15 +++-----------
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h | 31 -----------------------------
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
> index bf5d6e4..c64e78b 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
> @@ -7,18 +7,9 @@ config TI_SOC_THERMAL
> OMAP4460+ on die bandgap temperature sensor support. The register
> set is part of system control module.
>
> - This includes alert interrupts generation and also the TSHUT
> - support.
> -
> -config TI_THERMAL
> - bool "Texas Instruments SoCs thermal framework support"
> - depends on TI_SOC_THERMAL
> - help
> - If you say yes here you want to get support for generic thermal
> - framework for the Texas Instruments on die bandgap temperature sensor.
> -
> - This includes trip points definitions, extrapolation rules and
> - CPU cooling device bindings.
> + This includes alert interrupts generation, the TSHUT support,
> + trip points definitions, extrapolation rules and CPU cooling
> + device bindings.
>
> config OMAP4_THERMAL
> bool "Texas Instruments OMAP4 thermal support"
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile
> index 1226b24..c75cc91 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SOC_THERMAL) += ti-soc-thermal.o
> ti-soc-thermal-y := ti-bandgap.o
> -ti-soc-thermal-$(CONFIG_TI_THERMAL) += ti-thermal-common.o
> +ti-soc-thermal-y += ti-thermal-common.o
> ti-soc-thermal-$(CONFIG_DRA752_THERMAL) += dra752-thermal-data.o
> ti-soc-thermal-$(CONFIG_OMAP4_THERMAL) += omap4-thermal-data.o
> ti-soc-thermal-$(CONFIG_OMAP5_THERMAL) += omap5-thermal-data.o
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h
> index f8b7ffe..5fb427c 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h
> @@ -83,41 +83,10 @@
> #define ti_thermal_is_valid_trip(trip) \
> ((trip) >= 0 && (trip) < OMAP_TRIP_NUMBER)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TI_THERMAL
> int ti_thermal_expose_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, char *domain);
> int ti_thermal_remove_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id);
> int ti_thermal_report_sensor_temperature(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id);
> int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id);
> int ti_thermal_unregister_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id);
> -#else
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_expose_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, char *domain)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
>
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_remove_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_report_sensor_temperature(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_unregister_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
> #endif
>
--
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
Eduardo Valentin
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@ti.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: TI: always register sensor driver with core thermal framework
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 14:25:06 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524F0802.3070004@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466554.jrelSVKzU4@amdc1032>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4285 bytes --]
On 04-10-2013 08:40, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> There is little sense in having separate config option for
> registering the sensor driver with the core thermal framework.
> Fix it by integrating TI_THERMAL config option with TI_SOC_THERMAL
> one.
I am a bit confused of what is exactly wrong or needs fixing. The code
organization is so that the file ti-bandgap.c adds the support for TI
Bandgap IP. It is not aware of thermal framework. And the
ti-thermal-common.c file is expected to talk to thermal framework. Can
you please elaborate a bit more why this split is hurting you?
>
> Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig | 15 +++-----------
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h | 31 -----------------------------
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
> index bf5d6e4..c64e78b 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
> @@ -7,18 +7,9 @@ config TI_SOC_THERMAL
> OMAP4460+ on die bandgap temperature sensor support. The register
> set is part of system control module.
>
> - This includes alert interrupts generation and also the TSHUT
> - support.
> -
> -config TI_THERMAL
> - bool "Texas Instruments SoCs thermal framework support"
> - depends on TI_SOC_THERMAL
> - help
> - If you say yes here you want to get support for generic thermal
> - framework for the Texas Instruments on die bandgap temperature sensor.
> -
> - This includes trip points definitions, extrapolation rules and
> - CPU cooling device bindings.
> + This includes alert interrupts generation, the TSHUT support,
> + trip points definitions, extrapolation rules and CPU cooling
> + device bindings.
>
> config OMAP4_THERMAL
> bool "Texas Instruments OMAP4 thermal support"
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile
> index 1226b24..c75cc91 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Makefile
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SOC_THERMAL) += ti-soc-thermal.o
> ti-soc-thermal-y := ti-bandgap.o
> -ti-soc-thermal-$(CONFIG_TI_THERMAL) += ti-thermal-common.o
> +ti-soc-thermal-y += ti-thermal-common.o
> ti-soc-thermal-$(CONFIG_DRA752_THERMAL) += dra752-thermal-data.o
> ti-soc-thermal-$(CONFIG_OMAP4_THERMAL) += omap4-thermal-data.o
> ti-soc-thermal-$(CONFIG_OMAP5_THERMAL) += omap5-thermal-data.o
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h
> index f8b7ffe..5fb427c 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal.h
> @@ -83,41 +83,10 @@
> #define ti_thermal_is_valid_trip(trip) \
> ((trip) >= 0 && (trip) < OMAP_TRIP_NUMBER)
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_TI_THERMAL
> int ti_thermal_expose_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, char *domain);
> int ti_thermal_remove_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id);
> int ti_thermal_report_sensor_temperature(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id);
> int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id);
> int ti_thermal_unregister_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id);
> -#else
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_expose_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, char *domain)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
>
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_remove_sensor(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_report_sensor_temperature(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_register_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> -static inline
> -int ti_thermal_unregister_cpu_cooling(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
> #endif
>
--
You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport)
Eduardo Valentin
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 295 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-04 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-04 12:40 [PATCH 2/2] thermal: TI: always register sensor driver with core thermal framework Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2013-10-04 18:25 ` Eduardo Valentin [this message]
2013-10-04 18:25 ` Eduardo Valentin
2013-10-07 10:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524F0802.3070004@ti.com \
--to=eduardo.valentin@ti.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.