From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] VEXPRESS: Fix VEXPRESS implicit declarations dependence errors.
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:07:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52540388.8090709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381228895-24814-1-git-send-email-csmanjuvijay@gmail.com>
On 10/08/2013 05:41 AM, Majunath Goudar wrote:
> This patch adds a of_find_node_by_phandle() and of_get_next_parent()
> function declaration dependence on"#ifdef CONFIG_OF" in "include/linux/of.h"
> else part return inline dummy implementations (returning NULL). Without
> this patch,build system can lead to issues. This was discovered during
> randconfig testing,in which VEXPRESS_CONFIG was enabled w/o CONFIG_OF
> being enabled,leading to the following error:
What is blocking making VExpress DT only?
The subject should reflect the subsystem you are changing and the
description is missing spaces at a minimum.
Rob
>
> CC drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.o
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c: In function ?__vexpress_config_func_get?:
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c:117:4: error: implicit declaration of function
> ?of_find_node_by_phandle? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> bridge_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(
> ^
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c:117:16: warning: assignment makes pointer from
> integer without a cast [enabled by default]
> bridge_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(
>
> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar <csmanjuvijay@gmail.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/linux/of.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index f95aee3..968787d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -340,6 +340,15 @@ int of_device_is_stdout_path(struct device_node *dn);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_OF */
>
> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static inline const char* of_node_full_name(struct device_node *np)
> {
> return "<no-node>";
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Majunath Goudar <csmanjuvijay-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
nataraja.km-Hm3cg6mZ9cc@public.gmane.org,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VEXPRESS: Fix VEXPRESS implicit declarations dependence errors.
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:07:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52540388.8090709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381228895-24814-1-git-send-email-csmanjuvijay-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On 10/08/2013 05:41 AM, Majunath Goudar wrote:
> This patch adds a of_find_node_by_phandle() and of_get_next_parent()
> function declaration dependence on"#ifdef CONFIG_OF" in "include/linux/of.h"
> else part return inline dummy implementations (returning NULL). Without
> this patch,build system can lead to issues. This was discovered during
> randconfig testing,in which VEXPRESS_CONFIG was enabled w/o CONFIG_OF
> being enabled,leading to the following error:
What is blocking making VExpress DT only?
The subject should reflect the subsystem you are changing and the
description is missing spaces at a minimum.
Rob
>
> CC drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.o
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c: In function ‘__vexpress_config_func_get’:
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c:117:4: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘of_find_node_by_phandle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> bridge_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(
> ^
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c:117:16: warning: assignment makes pointer from
> integer without a cast [enabled by default]
> bridge_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(
>
> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar <csmanjuvijay-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> ---
> include/linux/of.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index f95aee3..968787d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -340,6 +340,15 @@ int of_device_is_stdout_path(struct device_node *dn);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_OF */
>
> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static inline const char* of_node_full_name(struct device_node *np)
> {
> return "<no-node>";
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
To: Majunath Goudar <csmanjuvijay@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, nataraja.km@lge.com,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] VEXPRESS: Fix VEXPRESS implicit declarations dependence errors.
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 08:07:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52540388.8090709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1381228895-24814-1-git-send-email-csmanjuvijay@gmail.com>
On 10/08/2013 05:41 AM, Majunath Goudar wrote:
> This patch adds a of_find_node_by_phandle() and of_get_next_parent()
> function declaration dependence on"#ifdef CONFIG_OF" in "include/linux/of.h"
> else part return inline dummy implementations (returning NULL). Without
> this patch,build system can lead to issues. This was discovered during
> randconfig testing,in which VEXPRESS_CONFIG was enabled w/o CONFIG_OF
> being enabled,leading to the following error:
What is blocking making VExpress DT only?
The subject should reflect the subsystem you are changing and the
description is missing spaces at a minimum.
Rob
>
> CC drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.o
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c: In function ‘__vexpress_config_func_get’:
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c:117:4: error: implicit declaration of function
> ‘of_find_node_by_phandle’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> bridge_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(
> ^
> drivers/mfd/vexpress-config.c:117:16: warning: assignment makes pointer from
> integer without a cast [enabled by default]
> bridge_node = of_find_node_by_phandle(
>
> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Goudar <csmanjuvijay@gmail.com>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> Cc: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> include/linux/of.h | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
> index f95aee3..968787d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/of.h
> +++ b/include/linux/of.h
> @@ -340,6 +340,15 @@ int of_device_is_stdout_path(struct device_node *dn);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_OF */
>
> +static inline struct device_node *of_find_node_by_phandle(phandle handle)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +static inline struct device_node *of_get_next_parent(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static inline const char* of_node_full_name(struct device_node *np)
> {
> return "<no-node>";
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-08 10:41 [PATCH] VEXPRESS: Fix VEXPRESS implicit declarations dependence errors Majunath Goudar
2013-10-08 10:41 ` Majunath Goudar
2013-10-08 13:07 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2013-10-08 13:07 ` Rob Herring
2013-10-08 13:07 ` Rob Herring
2013-10-08 14:51 ` Majunath Goudar
2013-10-08 14:51 ` Majunath Goudar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52540388.8090709@gmail.com \
--to=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.