Re: [PATCH] Explicitly set CHECKPOLICY path to native sysroot.

["David Nyström" <david.nystrom@enea.com>]

On Fri 11 Oct 2013 05:21:37 AM CEST, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:14 AM, David Nyström <david.c.nystrom@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 10/04/2013 07:23 PM, Philip Tricca wrote:
>>>
>>> Probably should add that I'm not very fond of having the path hard coded
>>> like this. Makes for a dependency on the install location from the
>>> checkpolicy recipe. For the short term this fixes the immediate issue
>>> though. Feedback on the "right way" to reference / find this binary
>>> would be appreciated.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> - Philip
>>
>>
>> I suppose the correct way would be to patch the configure scripts and
>> upstream that patch to Xen. But I have no problems with this, as long as
>> chkconfig referenced from native sysroot is in DEPENDS, to avoid build race
>> conditions.
>
> Which isn't the case at the moment.So this patch needs a bit more work.

I guess its true what they say, "noone can hear you be subtle on the 
internet" :)

> Philip: Are you talking about the selinux checkpolicy here ? I assume you are,
> but want to be sure. If you are, not only do we need the package in the
> DEPENDS, we need meta-selinux in the README's layer dependency list for
> meta-virt.

If so , we should make this dependency optional if selinux is in 
DISTRO_FEATURES.

>
> Bruce
>
>>
>> Br,
>> David
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> meta-virtualization mailing list
>> meta-virtualization@yoctoproject.org
>> https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-virtualization
>
>
>