All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Barinov <vladimir.barinov@cogentembedded.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: sata_rcar: Add RCAR Gen2 SATA PHY support
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 22:24:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52585E6F.40903@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131011010032.GA13809@verge.net.au>

Hello.

On 11-10-2013 3:00, Simon Horman wrote:

> [ CCed devicetree@vger.kernel.org as this involves DT compatibility strings ]

    Note that I did CC then-existing devicetree-discuss list when posting the 
original driver but we got no feedback from there. That's why the binding 
documentation is missing.

>> RCAR Gen2 SoC has a different phy which is not compatible with

    Hm, the SoCs family is called R-Car, is it so hard to remember? :-)

>> the older H1/M1 versions. This adds OF/platform device table
>> and PHY initialization callbacks for H2/M2 (Gen2) SoC.

[...]

>> PHY initialization method is chosen based on the device id.
>> Default PHY settings are applied for Gen2 SoC, which should
>> suit the available Gen2 boards.

>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com>
[skip overquoating, grr :-]
>> @@ -770,8 +823,34 @@ static void sata_rcar_init_controller(struct ata_host *host)
>>   	iowrite32(ATAPI_INT_ENABLE_SATAINT, base + ATAPI_INT_ENABLE_REG);
>>   }
>>
>> +static struct of_device_id sata_rcar_match[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "renesas,rcar-sata",
>> +		.data = (void *)RCAR_SATA
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7790",
>> +		.data = (void *)RCAR_GEN2_SATA
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7791",
>> +		.data = (void *)RCAR_GEN2_SATA
>> +	},
>> +	{},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sata_rcar_match);
>> +
>> +static const struct platform_device_id sata_rcar_id_table[] = {
>> +	{ "sata_rcar",		RCAR_SATA },
>> +	{ "sata-r8a7790",	RCAR_GEN2_SATA },
>> +	{ "sata-r8a7791",	RCAR_GEN2_SATA },
>> +	{ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, sata_rcat_id_table);
>> +

> I think it would be better to add sata-r8a7779 and
> sata-r8a7778 to handle the GEN1 hardware and deprecate rcar-sata.

    R8A7778 doesn't have the SATA controller AFAIR.

> Less importantly I think it would be better to name RCAR_SATA
> as RCAR_GEN1_SATA.

    Now that we have Gen2, yes.

WBR, Sergei


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
Cc: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Vladimir Barinov <vladimir.barinov@cogentembedded.com>,
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata: sata_rcar: Add RCAR Gen2 SATA PHY support
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:25:35 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52585E6F.40903@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131011010032.GA13809@verge.net.au>

Hello.

On 11-10-2013 3:00, Simon Horman wrote:

> [ CCed devicetree@vger.kernel.org as this involves DT compatibility strings ]

    Note that I did CC then-existing devicetree-discuss list when posting the 
original driver but we got no feedback from there. That's why the binding 
documentation is missing.

>> RCAR Gen2 SoC has a different phy which is not compatible with

    Hm, the SoCs family is called R-Car, is it so hard to remember? :-)

>> the older H1/M1 versions. This adds OF/platform device table
>> and PHY initialization callbacks for H2/M2 (Gen2) SoC.

[...]

>> PHY initialization method is chosen based on the device id.
>> Default PHY settings are applied for Gen2 SoC, which should
>> suit the available Gen2 boards.

>> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com>
[skip overquoating, grr :-]
>> @@ -770,8 +823,34 @@ static void sata_rcar_init_controller(struct ata_host *host)
>>   	iowrite32(ATAPI_INT_ENABLE_SATAINT, base + ATAPI_INT_ENABLE_REG);
>>   }
>>
>> +static struct of_device_id sata_rcar_match[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "renesas,rcar-sata",
>> +		.data = (void *)RCAR_SATA
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7790",
>> +		.data = (void *)RCAR_GEN2_SATA
>> +	},
>> +	{
>> +		.compatible = "renesas,sata-r8a7791",
>> +		.data = (void *)RCAR_GEN2_SATA
>> +	},
>> +	{},
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sata_rcar_match);
>> +
>> +static const struct platform_device_id sata_rcar_id_table[] = {
>> +	{ "sata_rcar",		RCAR_SATA },
>> +	{ "sata-r8a7790",	RCAR_GEN2_SATA },
>> +	{ "sata-r8a7791",	RCAR_GEN2_SATA },
>> +	{ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, sata_rcat_id_table);
>> +

> I think it would be better to add sata-r8a7779 and
> sata-r8a7778 to handle the GEN1 hardware and deprecate rcar-sata.

    R8A7778 doesn't have the SATA controller AFAIR.

> Less importantly I think it would be better to name RCAR_SATA
> as RCAR_GEN1_SATA.

    Now that we have Gen2, yes.

WBR, Sergei


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-11 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-10 19:08 [PATCH] ata: sata_rcar: Add RCAR Gen2 SATA PHY support Valentine Barshak
2013-10-10 19:08 ` Valentine Barshak
2013-10-11  1:00 ` Simon Horman
2013-10-11  1:00   ` Simon Horman
2013-10-11  9:41   ` Mark Rutland
2013-10-11  9:41     ` Mark Rutland
2013-10-11 10:54     ` Valentine
2013-10-11 10:54       ` Valentine
2013-10-11 14:47       ` Mark Rutland
2013-10-11 14:47         ` Mark Rutland
2013-10-11 15:14         ` Valentine
2013-10-11 15:14           ` Valentine
2013-10-11  9:53   ` Valentine
2013-10-11  9:53     ` Valentine
2013-10-11 19:25   ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2013-10-11 20:24     ` Sergei Shtylyov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52585E6F.40903@cogentembedded.com \
    --to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=valentine.barshak@cogentembedded.com \
    --cc=vladimir.barinov@cogentembedded.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.