From: jianhai luan <jianhai.luan@oracle.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
ANNIE LI <annie.li@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: DomU's network interface will hung when Dom0 running 32bit
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:29:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <525D513B.70406@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131015125802.GR11739@zion.uk.xensource.com>
On 2013-10-15 20:58, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 07:26:31PM +0800, jianhai luan wrote:
> [...]
>>>>> Can you propose a patch?
>>>> Because credit_timeout.expire always after jiffies, i judge the
>>>> value over the range of time_after_eq() by time_before(now,
>>>> vif->credit_timeout.expires). please check the patch.
>>> I don't think this really fix the issue for you. You still have chance
>>> that now wraps around and falls between expires and next_credit. In that
>>> case it's stalled again.
>> if time_before(now, vif->credit_timeout.expires) is true, time wrap
>> and do operation. Otherwise time_before(now,
>> vif->credit_timeout.expires) isn't true, now -
>> vif->credit_timeout.expires should be letter than ULONG_MAX/2.
>> Because next_credit large than vif->credit_timeout.expires
>> (next_crdit = vif->credit_timeout.expires +
>> msecs_to_jiffies(vif->credit_usec/1000)), the delta between now and
>> next_credit should be in range of time_after_eq(). So
>> time_after_eq() do correctly judge.
>>
> Not sure I understand you. Consider "now" is placed like this:
>
> expires now next_credit
> ----time increases this direction--->
>
> * time_after_eq(now, next_credit) -> false
> * time_before(now, expires) -> false
If now is placed in above environment, the result will be correct
(Sending package will be not allowed until next_credit).
* time_after_eq(now, next_credit) --> false will include two environment:
expires now next_credit
-----------time increases this direction ---->
Or
expires next_credit next_credit + MAX_LONG/2 now
-----------time increases this direction ---->
the first environment should be correct to control transmit. the second
environment is our included environment.
Jason
>
> Then it's stuck again. You're merely narrowing the window, not fixing
> the real problem.
>
> Wei.
>
>> Jason
>>> Wei.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-15 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-12 8:53 DomU's network interface will hung when Dom0 running 32bit jianhai luan
2013-10-14 11:19 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 2:44 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 2:44 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 8:43 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-15 8:43 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-15 9:34 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 10:06 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 10:06 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 11:26 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 11:26 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 12:58 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 12:58 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 14:29 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 14:29 ` jianhai luan [this message]
2013-10-15 14:49 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 14:49 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 14:50 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-15 15:19 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 16:03 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 16:03 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-15 16:23 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 16:23 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 0:15 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 0:15 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 15:19 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 14:50 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-16 7:35 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 7:35 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 9:39 ` annie li
2013-10-16 9:39 ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
2013-10-16 13:08 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 13:47 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-16 15:04 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 15:04 ` [Xen-devel] " jianhai luan
2013-10-16 15:17 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-16 15:17 ` [Xen-devel] " Wei Liu
2013-10-16 16:11 ` David Vrabel
2013-10-16 16:44 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 16:44 ` [Xen-devel] " jianhai luan
2013-10-16 16:11 ` David Vrabel
2013-10-16 15:26 ` annie li
2013-10-16 15:26 ` [Xen-devel] " annie li
2013-10-16 13:47 ` Wei Liu
2013-10-16 13:08 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-15 9:34 ` jianhai luan
2013-10-16 7:10 ` annie li
2013-10-16 8:46 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-16 8:46 ` Ian Campbell
2013-10-16 7:10 ` annie li
2013-10-14 11:19 ` Wei Liu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-10-12 8:53 jianhai luan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=525D513B.70406@oracle.com \
--to=jianhai.luan@oracle.com \
--cc=Ian.Campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=annie.li@oracle.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.