From: bcousson@baylibre.com (Benoit Cousson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 0/1] Device Tree Schema Source format proposal
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:51:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526158F3.4060104@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9610740.2oBMxfeRkE@amdc1227>
Hi Tomasz,
I'm glad you're back, we were missing you on that topic :-)
On 18/10/2013 16:56, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since the ARM Kernel Summit in Edinburgh is coming by big steps and we
> need some food for thought for discussions that will be happening there,
> I am posting my work in progress on Device Tree Schema Source format.
>
> I know I've been supposed to actively work on this and come up with
> something working long time ago already, but due to unexpected
> circumstances (aka neverending streams of other work) I could spend way
> less time than I wanted on it.
>
> How miserably I failed can be seen on an example of Benoit's and Fabien's
> attempt to solve this problem that has likely taken much less time and
> is in an already working state.
That was more a proof of concept that helped us checking our assumptions
and the feasibility. Based on the first feedbacks, we were working on a
slightly different v2, that will anyway not be ready for ELCE. Your
inputs are thus very welcome and will help progressing and converging on
the schema definition.
Well, at least, I hope :-)
> So here I am, posting whatever I have done till now to present my ideas
> that came to my mind while working on this and possibly allow wider
> discussion on this topic.
Great, I'll review that during the flight to be able to discuss that
next week.
> A work in progress text on DTSS format will be sent in a follow-up
> message, for clarity.
Thanks,
See you next week,
Benoit
--
Beno?t Cousson
BayLibre
Embedded Linux Technology Lab
www.baylibre.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Benoit Cousson <bcousson-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <t.figa-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org,
swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org,
grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org,
rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
khilman-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
fparent-rdvid1DuHRBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org,
galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
a.hajda-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
s.nawrocki-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
David Gibson
<david-xT8FGy+AXnRB3Ne2BGzF6laj5H9X9Tb+@public.gmane.org>,
Jon Loeliger <jdl-CYoMK+44s/E@public.gmane.org>,
"Chaiken,
Alison" <Alison_Chaiken-nmGgyN9QBj3QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] Device Tree Schema Source format proposal
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 17:51:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526158F3.4060104@baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9610740.2oBMxfeRkE@amdc1227>
Hi Tomasz,
I'm glad you're back, we were missing you on that topic :-)
On 18/10/2013 16:56, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since the ARM Kernel Summit in Edinburgh is coming by big steps and we
> need some food for thought for discussions that will be happening there,
> I am posting my work in progress on Device Tree Schema Source format.
>
> I know I've been supposed to actively work on this and come up with
> something working long time ago already, but due to unexpected
> circumstances (aka neverending streams of other work) I could spend way
> less time than I wanted on it.
>
> How miserably I failed can be seen on an example of Benoit's and Fabien's
> attempt to solve this problem that has likely taken much less time and
> is in an already working state.
That was more a proof of concept that helped us checking our assumptions
and the feasibility. Based on the first feedbacks, we were working on a
slightly different v2, that will anyway not be ready for ELCE. Your
inputs are thus very welcome and will help progressing and converging on
the schema definition.
Well, at least, I hope :-)
> So here I am, posting whatever I have done till now to present my ideas
> that came to my mind while working on this and possibly allow wider
> discussion on this topic.
Great, I'll review that during the flight to be able to discuss that
next week.
> A work in progress text on DTSS format will be sent in a follow-up
> message, for clarity.
Thanks,
See you next week,
Benoit
--
Benoît Cousson
BayLibre
Embedded Linux Technology Lab
www.baylibre.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-18 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 14:56 [RFC 0/1] Device Tree Schema Source format proposal Tomasz Figa
2013-10-18 14:56 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-18 14:57 ` [RFC 1/1] Device Tree Schema Source format description Tomasz Figa
2013-10-25 10:52 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-25 10:52 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-01-28 14:49 ` Grant Likely
2014-01-28 14:49 ` Grant Likely
2014-02-19 15:01 ` David Gibson
2014-02-19 15:01 ` David Gibson
2013-10-18 15:51 ` Benoit Cousson [this message]
2013-10-18 15:51 ` [RFC 0/1] Device Tree Schema Source format proposal Benoit Cousson
2013-10-18 16:35 ` jonsmirl at gmail.com
2013-10-18 16:35 ` jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
2013-10-18 16:49 ` jonsmirl at gmail.com
2013-10-18 16:49 ` jonsmirl-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w
[not found] ` <CAKON4OzqFtp8YKNvAxBnEwjTL1NS28OZW3AoVdCmu=+q9XWXog-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-19 7:43 ` Chaiken, Alison
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526158F3.4060104@baylibre.com \
--to=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.