From: Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] video: exynos_mipi_dsim: Use the generic PHY driver
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 08:38:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526F7412.60004@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23467785.uRr31aFEN8@amdc1227>
Hi Tomasz,
On Tue, OCT 28, 2013 21:24, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Donghwa,
>
> On Monday 28 of October 2013 15:12:08 Donghwa Lee wrote:
>> On Fri, OCT 25, 2013 06:57, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>> On 10/24/2013 05:57 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 24 October 2013 09:12 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>>> On 24 October 2013 20:00, Olof Johansson<olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@ti.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c
>>>>>>> index 32e5406..00b3a52 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c
>>>>>>> @@ -156,8 +157,7 @@ static int exynos_mipi_dsi_blank_mode(struct mipi_dsim_device *dsim, int power)
>>>>>>> exynos_mipi_regulator_enable(dsim);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /* enable MIPI-DSI PHY. */
>>>>>>> - if (dsim->pd->phy_enable)
>>>>>>> - dsim->pd->phy_enable(pdev, true);
>>>>>>> + phy_power_on(dsim->phy);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> clk_enable(dsim->clock);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This introduces the below with exynos_defconfig:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ../../drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c: In function
>>>>>> 'exynos_mipi_dsi_blank_mode':
>>>>>> ../../drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c:144:26: warning: unused
>>>>>> variable 'pdev' [-Wunused-variable]
>>>>>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dsim->dev);
>>> Sorry about missing that, I only noticed this warning recently and didn't
>>> get around to submit a patch.
>>>
>>>>> I have already submitted a patch to fix this [1]
>>> Thanks a lot guys for fixing this.
>>>
>>>>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev&m\x138233359617936&w=2
>>>> Sorry, missed that :-(
>>> This MIPI DSIM driver is affectively a dead code in the mainline now, once
>>> Exynos become a dt-only platform. I guess it can be deleted for 3.14, once
>>> S5P gets converted to the device tree. The new driver using CDF is basically
>>> a complete rewrite. Or device tree support should be added to that driver,
>>> but I believe it doesn't make sense without CDF.
>>>
>> MIPI DSIM driver is not a dead code. There is a steady trickle of patches.
>> It's kind of late, but, I will update it as DT based drivers as soon as possible.
>> And Why do you think that DT support of existing MIPI DSIM is something less
>> than great?
> First of all, the exynos_mipi_dsim driver has currently no users in
> mainline kernel, so it is essentially dead code. In addition, on
> a platform that is the primary candidate for using it, which is Exynos,
> there is no way to use it, due to no DT support.
As I mentioned above, patches are submitted sometimes and I will update
this driver as soon as possible to support DT.
> As for the driver itself, it is not really a great example of good code.
> It contains a hacks, like calling msleep() without any clear reason and
> also many coding style issues. I'd prefer to replace it with the new
> exynos-dsi driver rewritten completely in SRPOL, when CDF is finished.
Yes, I know this drivers had been changed about only minor issues and
it is not really good code style. And CDF is more good and light.
But discussion for CDF is still remaining a kind of requests. If it is merged
into linux kernel and many users use it, existing MIPI DSI drivers will be
replaced with the new drivers naturally, isn't it?
Until that, I and quite a few users will update and code re-factory for
this drivers to be more better.
BR,
Donghwa Lee
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Donghwa Lee <dh09.lee@samsung.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@gmail.com>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
"linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
inki.dae@samsung.com, dh09.lee@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] video: exynos_mipi_dsim: Use the generic PHY driver
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:38:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526F7412.60004@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23467785.uRr31aFEN8@amdc1227>
Hi Tomasz,
On Tue, OCT 28, 2013 21:24, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Donghwa,
>
> On Monday 28 of October 2013 15:12:08 Donghwa Lee wrote:
>> On Fri, OCT 25, 2013 06:57, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>> On 10/24/2013 05:57 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 24 October 2013 09:12 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>>> On 24 October 2013 20:00, Olof Johansson<olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@ti.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c
>>>>>>> index 32e5406..00b3a52 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c
>>>>>>> @@ -156,8 +157,7 @@ static int exynos_mipi_dsi_blank_mode(struct mipi_dsim_device *dsim, int power)
>>>>>>> exynos_mipi_regulator_enable(dsim);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /* enable MIPI-DSI PHY. */
>>>>>>> - if (dsim->pd->phy_enable)
>>>>>>> - dsim->pd->phy_enable(pdev, true);
>>>>>>> + phy_power_on(dsim->phy);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> clk_enable(dsim->clock);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This introduces the below with exynos_defconfig:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ../../drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c: In function
>>>>>> 'exynos_mipi_dsi_blank_mode':
>>>>>> ../../drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c:144:26: warning: unused
>>>>>> variable 'pdev' [-Wunused-variable]
>>>>>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dsim->dev);
>>> Sorry about missing that, I only noticed this warning recently and didn't
>>> get around to submit a patch.
>>>
>>>>> I have already submitted a patch to fix this [1]
>>> Thanks a lot guys for fixing this.
>>>
>>>>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev&m=138233359617936&w=2
>>>> Sorry, missed that :-(
>>> This MIPI DSIM driver is affectively a dead code in the mainline now, once
>>> Exynos become a dt-only platform. I guess it can be deleted for 3.14, once
>>> S5P gets converted to the device tree. The new driver using CDF is basically
>>> a complete rewrite. Or device tree support should be added to that driver,
>>> but I believe it doesn't make sense without CDF.
>>>
>> MIPI DSIM driver is not a dead code. There is a steady trickle of patches.
>> It's kind of late, but, I will update it as DT based drivers as soon as possible.
>> And Why do you think that DT support of existing MIPI DSIM is something less
>> than great?
> First of all, the exynos_mipi_dsim driver has currently no users in
> mainline kernel, so it is essentially dead code. In addition, on
> a platform that is the primary candidate for using it, which is Exynos,
> there is no way to use it, due to no DT support.
As I mentioned above, patches are submitted sometimes and I will update
this driver as soon as possible to support DT.
> As for the driver itself, it is not really a great example of good code.
> It contains a hacks, like calling msleep() without any clear reason and
> also many coding style issues. I'd prefer to replace it with the new
> exynos-dsi driver rewritten completely in SRPOL, when CDF is finished.
Yes, I know this drivers had been changed about only minor issues and
it is not really good code style. And CDF is more good and light.
But discussion for CDF is still remaining a kind of requests. If it is merged
into linux kernel and many users use it, existing MIPI DSI drivers will be
replaced with the new drivers naturally, isn't it?
Until that, I and quite a few users will update and code re-factory for
this drivers to be more better.
BR,
Donghwa Lee
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dh09.lee@samsung.com (Donghwa Lee)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] video: exynos_mipi_dsim: Use the generic PHY driver
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:38:42 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <526F7412.60004@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <23467785.uRr31aFEN8@amdc1227>
Hi Tomasz,
On Tue, OCT 28, 2013 21:24, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Donghwa,
>
> On Monday 28 of October 2013 15:12:08 Donghwa Lee wrote:
>> On Fri, OCT 25, 2013 06:57, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote:
>>> On 10/24/2013 05:57 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 24 October 2013 09:12 PM, Sachin Kamat wrote:
>>>>> On 24 October 2013 20:00, Olof Johansson<olof@lixom.net> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I<kishon@ti.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c
>>>>>>> index 32e5406..00b3a52 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c
>>>>>>> @@ -156,8 +157,7 @@ static int exynos_mipi_dsi_blank_mode(struct mipi_dsim_device *dsim, int power)
>>>>>>> exynos_mipi_regulator_enable(dsim);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /* enable MIPI-DSI PHY. */
>>>>>>> - if (dsim->pd->phy_enable)
>>>>>>> - dsim->pd->phy_enable(pdev, true);
>>>>>>> + phy_power_on(dsim->phy);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> clk_enable(dsim->clock);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> This introduces the below with exynos_defconfig:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ../../drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c: In function
>>>>>> 'exynos_mipi_dsi_blank_mode':
>>>>>> ../../drivers/video/exynos/exynos_mipi_dsi.c:144:26: warning: unused
>>>>>> variable 'pdev' [-Wunused-variable]
>>>>>> struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dsim->dev);
>>> Sorry about missing that, I only noticed this warning recently and didn't
>>> get around to submit a patch.
>>>
>>>>> I have already submitted a patch to fix this [1]
>>> Thanks a lot guys for fixing this.
>>>
>>>>> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-fbdev&m=138233359617936&w=2
>>>> Sorry, missed that :-(
>>> This MIPI DSIM driver is affectively a dead code in the mainline now, once
>>> Exynos become a dt-only platform. I guess it can be deleted for 3.14, once
>>> S5P gets converted to the device tree. The new driver using CDF is basically
>>> a complete rewrite. Or device tree support should be added to that driver,
>>> but I believe it doesn't make sense without CDF.
>>>
>> MIPI DSIM driver is not a dead code. There is a steady trickle of patches.
>> It's kind of late, but, I will update it as DT based drivers as soon as possible.
>> And Why do you think that DT support of existing MIPI DSIM is something less
>> than great?
> First of all, the exynos_mipi_dsim driver has currently no users in
> mainline kernel, so it is essentially dead code. In addition, on
> a platform that is the primary candidate for using it, which is Exynos,
> there is no way to use it, due to no DT support.
As I mentioned above, patches are submitted sometimes and I will update
this driver as soon as possible to support DT.
> As for the driver itself, it is not really a great example of good code.
> It contains a hacks, like calling msleep() without any clear reason and
> also many coding style issues. I'd prefer to replace it with the new
> exynos-dsi driver rewritten completely in SRPOL, when CDF is finished.
Yes, I know this drivers had been changed about only minor issues and
it is not really good code style. And CDF is more good and light.
But discussion for CDF is still remaining a kind of requests. If it is merged
into linux kernel and many users use it, existing MIPI DSI drivers will be
replaced with the new drivers naturally, isn't it?
Until that, I and quite a few users will update and code re-factory for
this drivers to be more better.
BR,
Donghwa Lee
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-29 8:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-16 16:28 [PATCH 0/7] video phy's adaptation to *generic phy framework* Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:40 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 1/7] phy: Add driver for Exynos MIPI CSIS/DSIM DPHYs Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:40 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 2/7] exynos4-is: Use the generic MIPI CSIS PHY driver Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:40 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 3/7] video: exynos_mipi_dsim: Use the generic " Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:40 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 14:30 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-24 14:30 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-24 14:30 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-24 15:27 ` [PATCH] drivers: video: exynos: Fix compiler Warning Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 15:39 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 15:27 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 15:27 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 15:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-24 15:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-24 15:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-24 15:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-10-24 15:42 ` [PATCH 3/7] video: exynos_mipi_dsim: Use the generic PHY driver Sachin Kamat
2013-10-24 15:54 ` Sachin Kamat
2013-10-24 15:42 ` Sachin Kamat
2013-10-24 15:57 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 15:57 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 15:57 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 15:57 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 21:57 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-10-24 21:57 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-10-24 21:57 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-10-28 6:12 ` Donghwa Lee
2013-10-28 6:12 ` Donghwa Lee
2013-10-28 6:12 ` Donghwa Lee
2013-10-28 12:24 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-28 12:24 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-28 12:24 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-10-29 8:38 ` Donghwa Lee [this message]
2013-10-29 8:38 ` Donghwa Lee
2013-10-29 8:38 ` Donghwa Lee
2013-10-30 0:43 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-10-30 0:43 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-10-30 0:43 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-10-24 17:06 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-24 17:06 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-24 17:06 ` Olof Johansson
2013-10-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 4/7] ARM: Samsung: Remove the MIPI PHY setup code Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:40 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 5/7] phy: Add driver for Exynos DP PHY Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:40 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-24 15:13 ` Tomasz Stanislawski
2013-10-24 15:13 ` Tomasz Stanislawski
2013-10-24 15:13 ` Tomasz Stanislawski
2013-10-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 6/7] video: exynos_dp: remove non-DT support for Exynos Display Port Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:40 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` [PATCH 7/7] video: exynos_dp: Use the generic PHY driver Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:40 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 16:28 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 17:03 ` [PATCH] phy: exynos-mipi-video: Fix phy_power_off() callback Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-10-16 17:03 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2013-10-16 23:10 ` Jingoo Han
2013-10-16 23:10 ` Jingoo Han
2013-10-18 5:31 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-18 5:31 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2013-10-16 20:49 ` [PATCH 0/7] video phy's adaptation to *generic phy framework* Greg KH
2013-10-16 20:49 ` Greg KH
2013-10-16 20:49 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=526F7412.60004@samsung.com \
--to=dh09.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.