All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Overriding linux-imx kernel defconfig
@ 2013-11-01 13:00 Janis Coders
  2013-11-01 13:21 ` Otavio Salvador
  2013-11-01 15:35 ` Eric Bénard
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Janis Coders @ 2013-11-01 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org

Hi, I have a question regarding linux-imx defconfig overriding.
In 1.4 when overraiding linux-imx kernel recipe, I could add my cusom  
defconfig under linux-imx subdirectory and it was the priority, but now 
in 1.5 the priority goes to meta-fsl-arm layers kernel recipe.
If I move my defconfig under linux-imx/mx5/ then priority goes to my 
layer. In log files do_unpack I see that the order has changed (1.4 -> 
1.5) traversing directories.
Is this traversing change related to new 1.5 yocto version (bitbake?), 
or it is changed somewhere in freescale community recipes?






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Overriding linux-imx kernel defconfig
  2013-11-01 13:00 Overriding linux-imx kernel defconfig Janis Coders
@ 2013-11-01 13:21 ` Otavio Salvador
  2013-11-01 15:35 ` Eric Bénard
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Otavio Salvador @ 2013-11-01 13:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janis Coders; +Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org

On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Janis Coders <janis.coders@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, I have a question regarding linux-imx defconfig overriding.
> In 1.4 when overraiding linux-imx kernel recipe, I could add my cusom
> defconfig under linux-imx subdirectory and it was the priority, but now in
> 1.5 the priority goes to meta-fsl-arm layers kernel recipe.
> If I move my defconfig under linux-imx/mx5/ then priority goes to my layer.
> In log files do_unpack I see that the order has changed (1.4 -> 1.5)
> traversing directories.
> Is this traversing change related to new 1.5 yocto version (bitbake?), or it
> is changed somewhere in freescale community recipes?

This is bitbake issue. I think your use-case is a valid one and we
should check it. Do you mind to bring this discussion in oe-core
mailing list?

-- 
Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems
http://www.ossystems.com.br        http://code.ossystems.com.br
Mobile: +55 (53) 9981-7854            Mobile: +1 (347) 903-9750


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Overriding linux-imx kernel defconfig
  2013-11-01 13:00 Overriding linux-imx kernel defconfig Janis Coders
  2013-11-01 13:21 ` Otavio Salvador
@ 2013-11-01 15:35 ` Eric Bénard
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric Bénard @ 2013-11-01 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Janis Coders; +Cc: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org

Hi Janis,

Le Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:00:33 +0200,
Janis Coders <janis.coders@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi, I have a question regarding linux-imx defconfig overriding.
> In 1.4 when overraiding linux-imx kernel recipe, I could add my cusom  
> defconfig under linux-imx subdirectory and it was the priority, but now 
> in 1.5 the priority goes to meta-fsl-arm layers kernel recipe.
> If I move my defconfig under linux-imx/mx5/ then priority goes to my 
> layer. In log files do_unpack I see that the order has changed (1.4 -> 
> 1.5) traversing directories.
> Is this traversing change related to new 1.5 yocto version (bitbake?), 
> or it is changed somewhere in freescale community recipes?
> 
try cherry picking this patch in oe-core :
92cbf7eeea553bfa24c7081473fa8bc4ebc1f552

Eric


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-11-01 15:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-01 13:00 Overriding linux-imx kernel defconfig Janis Coders
2013-11-01 13:21 ` Otavio Salvador
2013-11-01 15:35 ` Eric Bénard

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.