From: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org"
<linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle IRQ
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:05:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52777187.5010202@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131104103434.5a085e27-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
On 11/04/2013 05:34 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> I'm hitting a problem with that patch now...
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:18:25 +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> When the temperature exceed the limit range value,
>> the driver can handle the interrupt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> index 1da2eff..2e68773 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>
>> /*
>> * Addresses to scan
>> @@ -1433,6 +1434,16 @@ static bool lm90_is_tripped(struct i2c_client *client)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +static irqreturn_t lm90_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct i2c_client *client = dev_id;
>> +
>> + if (lm90_is_tripped(client))
>
> Did you really send the latest version of the patch? lm90_is_tripped()
> takes two arguments now, but here you only pass one.
>
> If you have a more up-to-date version of this patch, please send it
> over quickly.
Hi, Jean
It's so sorry. As you know I resend the "[PATCH RESEND v4 1/3] hwmon:
(lm90) Define status bits" last week, but didn't rebase this patch. I
will rebase it and send it right now.
Wei.
Thanks.
>
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> + else
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -1509,6 +1520,18 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> goto exit_remove_files;
>> }
>>
>> + if (client->irq) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> + err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq,
>> + NULL, lm90_irq_thread,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> + "lm90", client);
>> + if (err < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "cannot request IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> + goto exit_remove_files;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>>
>> exit_remove_files:
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org"
<linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
"lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org"
<lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH v4 2/3] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle IRQ
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:05:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52777187.5010202@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131104103434.5a085e27-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
On 11/04/2013 05:34 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> I'm hitting a problem with that patch now...
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:18:25 +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> When the temperature exceed the limit range value,
>> the driver can handle the interrupt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> index 1da2eff..2e68773 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>
>> /*
>> * Addresses to scan
>> @@ -1433,6 +1434,16 @@ static bool lm90_is_tripped(struct i2c_client *client)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +static irqreturn_t lm90_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct i2c_client *client = dev_id;
>> +
>> + if (lm90_is_tripped(client))
>
> Did you really send the latest version of the patch? lm90_is_tripped()
> takes two arguments now, but here you only pass one.
>
> If you have a more up-to-date version of this patch, please send it
> over quickly.
Hi, Jean
It's so sorry. As you know I resend the "[PATCH RESEND v4 1/3] hwmon:
(lm90) Define status bits" last week, but didn't rebase this patch. I
will rebase it and send it right now.
Wei.
Thanks.
>
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> + else
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -1509,6 +1520,18 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> goto exit_remove_files;
>> }
>>
>> + if (client->irq) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> + err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq,
>> + NULL, lm90_irq_thread,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> + "lm90", client);
>> + if (err < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "cannot request IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> + goto exit_remove_files;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>>
>> exit_remove_files:
>
>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: "linux@roeck-us.net" <linux@roeck-us.net>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle IRQ
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:05:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52777187.5010202@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131104103434.5a085e27@endymion.delvare>
On 11/04/2013 05:34 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
> I'm hitting a problem with that patch now...
>
> On Wed, 7 Aug 2013 14:18:25 +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> When the temperature exceed the limit range value,
>> the driver can handle the interrupt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwmon/lm90.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> index 1da2eff..2e68773 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>
>> /*
>> * Addresses to scan
>> @@ -1433,6 +1434,16 @@ static bool lm90_is_tripped(struct i2c_client *client)
>> return true;
>> }
>>
>> +static irqreturn_t lm90_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + struct i2c_client *client = dev_id;
>> +
>> + if (lm90_is_tripped(client))
>
> Did you really send the latest version of the patch? lm90_is_tripped()
> takes two arguments now, but here you only pass one.
>
> If you have a more up-to-date version of this patch, please send it
> over quickly.
Hi, Jean
It's so sorry. As you know I resend the "[PATCH RESEND v4 1/3] hwmon:
(lm90) Define status bits" last week, but didn't rebase this patch. I
will rebase it and send it right now.
Wei.
Thanks.
>
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> + else
>> + return IRQ_NONE;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> const struct i2c_device_id *id)
>> {
>> @@ -1509,6 +1520,18 @@ static int lm90_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>> goto exit_remove_files;
>> }
>>
>> + if (client->irq) {
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> + err = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, client->irq,
>> + NULL, lm90_irq_thread,
>> + IRQF_TRIGGER_LOW | IRQF_ONESHOT,
>> + "lm90", client);
>> + if (err < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "cannot request IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
>> + goto exit_remove_files;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> return 0;
>>
>> exit_remove_files:
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-04 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 6:18 [PATCH v4 0/3] Lm90 Enhancements Wei Ni
2013-08-07 6:18 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-07 6:18 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-08-07 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] hwmon: (lm90) Define status bits Wei Ni
2013-08-07 6:18 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-07 6:18 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1375856306-14415-2-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-30 15:41 ` Jean Delvare
2013-10-30 15:41 ` Jean Delvare
2013-10-30 15:41 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2013-10-30 17:03 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-10-30 17:03 ` [lm-sensors] " Guenter Roeck
2013-10-31 2:47 ` Wei Ni
2013-10-31 2:47 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <5271C4C4.2040308-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-31 3:09 ` Wei Ni
2013-10-31 3:09 ` Wei Ni
2013-10-31 3:09 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1375856306-14415-1-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-08-07 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] hwmon: (lm90) add support to handle IRQ Wei Ni
2013-08-07 6:18 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-07 6:18 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1375856306-14415-3-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-30 15:53 ` Jean Delvare
2013-10-30 15:53 ` Jean Delvare
2013-10-30 15:53 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2013-11-04 9:34 ` Jean Delvare
2013-11-04 9:34 ` Jean Delvare
2013-11-04 9:34 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20131104103434.5a085e27-R0o5gVi9kd7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-04 10:05 ` Wei Ni [this message]
2013-11-04 10:05 ` Wei Ni
2013-11-04 10:05 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
2013-09-09 6:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] Lm90 Enhancements Wei Ni
2013-09-09 6:16 ` Wei Ni
2013-09-09 6:16 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <522D67B2.4030406-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-09-09 7:42 ` Jean Delvare
2013-09-09 7:42 ` Jean Delvare
2013-09-09 7:42 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2013-08-07 6:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] hwmon: (lm90) use enums for the indexes of temp8 and temp11 Wei Ni
2013-08-07 6:18 ` Wei Ni
2013-08-07 6:18 ` [lm-sensors] " Wei Ni
[not found] ` <1375856306-14415-4-git-send-email-wni-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-10-30 16:21 ` Jean Delvare
2013-10-30 16:21 ` Jean Delvare
2013-10-30 16:21 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52777187.5010202@nvidia.com \
--to=wni-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.