All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>,
	linus-serial@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM/serial: at91: switch atmel serial to use gpiolib
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:52:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52792262.7030803@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105162828.GC28304@ns203013.ovh.net>

On 05/11/2013 17:28, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 13:35 Tue 05 Nov     , Linus Walleij wrote:
>> This passes the errata fix using a GPIO to control the RTS pin
>> on one of the AT91 chips to use gpiolib instead of the
>> AT91-specific interfaces. Also remove the reliance on
>> compile-time #defines and the cpu_* check and rely on the
>> platform passing down the proper GPIO pin through platform
>> data.
>>
>> This is a prerequisite for getting rid of the local GPIO
>> implementation in the AT91 platform and move toward
>> multiplatform.
>>
>> This also makes way for device tree conversion: the RTS
>> GPIO pin can be passed by standard GPIO bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> This is an alternative to the patch entitled
>> "ARM/serial: at91: move machine quirk into machine"
>> which needs testing to confirm this approach.
>> Seeking ACKs on this if the approach seems OK to
>> all parties.
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c |  1 +
>>   drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c       | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>   include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h     |  1 +
>>   3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c
>> index c721e9b08066..51d4c08962f6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c
>> @@ -961,6 +961,7 @@ static struct resource uart0_resources[] = {
>>   static struct atmel_uart_data uart0_data = {
>>   	.use_dma_tx	= 1,
>>   	.use_dma_rx	= 1,
>> +	.rts_gpio	= AT91_PIN_PA21,
>>   };
>>
>>   static u64 uart0_dmamask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> index d067285a2d20..3d5c848cdfe1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> @@ -41,15 +41,11 @@
>>   #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>>   #include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h>
>>   #include <linux/timer.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>>
>>   #include <asm/io.h>
>>   #include <asm/ioctls.h>
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> -#include <mach/cpu.h>
>> -#include <asm/gpio.h>
>> -#endif
>> -
>>   #define PDC_BUFFER_SIZE		512
>>   /* Revisit: We should calculate this based on the actual port settings */
>>   #define PDC_RX_TIMEOUT		(3 * 10)		/* 3 bytes */
>> @@ -167,6 +163,7 @@ struct atmel_uart_port {
>>   	struct circ_buf		rx_ring;
>>
>>   	struct serial_rs485	rs485;		/* rs485 settings */
>> +	int			rts_gpio;	/* optional RTS GPIO */
>>   	unsigned int		tx_done_mask;
>>   	bool			is_usart;	/* usart or uart */
>>   	struct timer_list	uart_timer;	/* uart timer */
>> @@ -300,20 +297,17 @@ static void atmel_set_mctrl(struct uart_port *port, u_int mctrl)
>>   	unsigned int mode;
>>   	struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port = to_atmel_uart_port(port);
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200
>> -	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200()) {
>> -		/*
>> -		 * AT91RM9200 Errata #39: RTS0 is not internally connected
>> -		 * to PA21. We need to drive the pin manually.
>> -		 */
>> -		if (port->mapbase == AT91RM9200_BASE_US0) {
>> -			if (mctrl & TIOCM_RTS)
>> -				at91_set_gpio_value(AT91_PIN_PA21, 0);
>> -			else
>> -				at91_set_gpio_value(AT91_PIN_PA21, 1);
>> -		}
>> +	/*
>> +	 * AT91RM9200 Errata #39: RTS0 is not internally connected
>> +	 * to PA21. We need to drive the pin as a GPIO.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (gpio_is_valid(atmel_port->rts_gpio) &&
>> +	    port->mapbase == AT91RM9200_BASE_US0) {
> not really a fon of this hack
>
> if we use a uart for rs485 we need to use a gpio for rts too
>
> so we may need to find a better way

Yes... but the problem from now on is to remove another hack which 
prevents us from moving forward to the single zImage direction (with the 
help of Linus W.).

So, before that we can enhance the code for RS-485, I am in favor of a 
move with this patch which is equivalent to what we already have in the 
driver nowadays.

But is is true that we can add another patch on top of this one to 
remove the restriction on "AT91RM9200_BASE_US0". If you feel it is a 
good idea, go on and send a patch.

Bye,



>> +		if (mctrl & TIOCM_RTS)
>> +			gpio_set_value(atmel_port->rts_gpio, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			gpio_set_value(atmel_port->rts_gpio, 1);
>>   	}
>> -#endif
>>
>>   	if (mctrl & TIOCM_RTS)
>>   		control |= ATMEL_US_RTSEN;
>> @@ -2365,6 +2359,27 @@ static int atmel_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	port = &atmel_ports[ret];
>>   	port->backup_imr = 0;
>>   	port->uart.line = ret;
>> +	port->rts_gpio = -1; /* Invalid, zero could be valid */
>> +	/*
>> +	 * In theory the GPIO pin controlling RTS could be zero and
>> +	 * this would be an improper check, but we know that the only
>> +	 * existing case is != 0 and it's nice to use the zero-initialized
>> +	 * structs to indicate "no RTS GPIO" instead of open-coding some
>> +	 * invalid value everywhere.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (pdata->rts_gpio > 0) {
> 	this can not work 0 is a valid gpio if you do this you need to update
> 	ALL the bard filee too to set it as -EINVAL;
>> +		ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->rts_gpio, "RTS");
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error requesting RTS GPIO\n");
>> +			goto err;
>> +		}
>> +		port->rts_gpio = pdata->rts_gpio;
>> +		ret = gpio_direction_output(port->rts_gpio, 0);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error setting up RTS GPIO\n");
>> +			goto err;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>
>>   	ret = atmel_init_port(port, pdev);
>>   	if (ret)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h b/include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h
>> index cea9f70133c5..e26b0c14edea 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct atmel_uart_data {
>>   	short			use_dma_rx;	/* use receive DMA? */
>>   	void __iomem		*regs;		/* virt. base address, if any */
>>   	struct serial_rs485	rs485;		/* rs485 settings */
>> +	int			rts_gpio;	/* optional RTS GPIO */
>>   };
>>
>>    /* Touchscreen Controller */
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>
>


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM/serial: at91: switch atmel serial to use gpiolib
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:52:50 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52792262.7030803@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131105162828.GC28304@ns203013.ovh.net>

On 05/11/2013 17:28, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD :
> On 13:35 Tue 05 Nov     , Linus Walleij wrote:
>> This passes the errata fix using a GPIO to control the RTS pin
>> on one of the AT91 chips to use gpiolib instead of the
>> AT91-specific interfaces. Also remove the reliance on
>> compile-time #defines and the cpu_* check and rely on the
>> platform passing down the proper GPIO pin through platform
>> data.
>>
>> This is a prerequisite for getting rid of the local GPIO
>> implementation in the AT91 platform and move toward
>> multiplatform.
>>
>> This also makes way for device tree conversion: the RTS
>> GPIO pin can be passed by standard GPIO bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> This is an alternative to the patch entitled
>> "ARM/serial: at91: move machine quirk into machine"
>> which needs testing to confirm this approach.
>> Seeking ACKs on this if the approach seems OK to
>> all parties.
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c |  1 +
>>   drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c       | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
>>   include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h     |  1 +
>>   3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c
>> index c721e9b08066..51d4c08962f6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200_devices.c
>> @@ -961,6 +961,7 @@ static struct resource uart0_resources[] = {
>>   static struct atmel_uart_data uart0_data = {
>>   	.use_dma_tx	= 1,
>>   	.use_dma_rx	= 1,
>> +	.rts_gpio	= AT91_PIN_PA21,
>>   };
>>
>>   static u64 uart0_dmamask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> index d067285a2d20..3d5c848cdfe1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
>> @@ -41,15 +41,11 @@
>>   #include <linux/uaccess.h>
>>   #include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h>
>>   #include <linux/timer.h>
>> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
>>
>>   #include <asm/io.h>
>>   #include <asm/ioctls.h>
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
>> -#include <mach/cpu.h>
>> -#include <asm/gpio.h>
>> -#endif
>> -
>>   #define PDC_BUFFER_SIZE		512
>>   /* Revisit: We should calculate this based on the actual port settings */
>>   #define PDC_RX_TIMEOUT		(3 * 10)		/* 3 bytes */
>> @@ -167,6 +163,7 @@ struct atmel_uart_port {
>>   	struct circ_buf		rx_ring;
>>
>>   	struct serial_rs485	rs485;		/* rs485 settings */
>> +	int			rts_gpio;	/* optional RTS GPIO */
>>   	unsigned int		tx_done_mask;
>>   	bool			is_usart;	/* usart or uart */
>>   	struct timer_list	uart_timer;	/* uart timer */
>> @@ -300,20 +297,17 @@ static void atmel_set_mctrl(struct uart_port *port, u_int mctrl)
>>   	unsigned int mode;
>>   	struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port = to_atmel_uart_port(port);
>>
>> -#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_AT91RM9200
>> -	if (cpu_is_at91rm9200()) {
>> -		/*
>> -		 * AT91RM9200 Errata #39: RTS0 is not internally connected
>> -		 * to PA21. We need to drive the pin manually.
>> -		 */
>> -		if (port->mapbase == AT91RM9200_BASE_US0) {
>> -			if (mctrl & TIOCM_RTS)
>> -				at91_set_gpio_value(AT91_PIN_PA21, 0);
>> -			else
>> -				at91_set_gpio_value(AT91_PIN_PA21, 1);
>> -		}
>> +	/*
>> +	 * AT91RM9200 Errata #39: RTS0 is not internally connected
>> +	 * to PA21. We need to drive the pin as a GPIO.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (gpio_is_valid(atmel_port->rts_gpio) &&
>> +	    port->mapbase == AT91RM9200_BASE_US0) {
> not really a fon of this hack
>
> if we use a uart for rs485 we need to use a gpio for rts too
>
> so we may need to find a better way

Yes... but the problem from now on is to remove another hack which 
prevents us from moving forward to the single zImage direction (with the 
help of Linus W.).

So, before that we can enhance the code for RS-485, I am in favor of a 
move with this patch which is equivalent to what we already have in the 
driver nowadays.

But is is true that we can add another patch on top of this one to 
remove the restriction on "AT91RM9200_BASE_US0". If you feel it is a 
good idea, go on and send a patch.

Bye,



>> +		if (mctrl & TIOCM_RTS)
>> +			gpio_set_value(atmel_port->rts_gpio, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			gpio_set_value(atmel_port->rts_gpio, 1);
>>   	}
>> -#endif
>>
>>   	if (mctrl & TIOCM_RTS)
>>   		control |= ATMEL_US_RTSEN;
>> @@ -2365,6 +2359,27 @@ static int atmel_serial_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	port = &atmel_ports[ret];
>>   	port->backup_imr = 0;
>>   	port->uart.line = ret;
>> +	port->rts_gpio = -1; /* Invalid, zero could be valid */
>> +	/*
>> +	 * In theory the GPIO pin controlling RTS could be zero and
>> +	 * this would be an improper check, but we know that the only
>> +	 * existing case is != 0 and it's nice to use the zero-initialized
>> +	 * structs to indicate "no RTS GPIO" instead of open-coding some
>> +	 * invalid value everywhere.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (pdata->rts_gpio > 0) {
> 	this can not work 0 is a valid gpio if you do this you need to update
> 	ALL the bard filee too to set it as -EINVAL;
>> +		ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->rts_gpio, "RTS");
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error requesting RTS GPIO\n");
>> +			goto err;
>> +		}
>> +		port->rts_gpio = pdata->rts_gpio;
>> +		ret = gpio_direction_output(port->rts_gpio, 0);
>> +		if (ret) {
>> +			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error setting up RTS GPIO\n");
>> +			goto err;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>
>>   	ret = atmel_init_port(port, pdev);
>>   	if (ret)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h b/include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h
>> index cea9f70133c5..e26b0c14edea 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/atmel.h
>> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ struct atmel_uart_data {
>>   	short			use_dma_rx;	/* use receive DMA? */
>>   	void __iomem		*regs;		/* virt. base address, if any */
>>   	struct serial_rs485	rs485;		/* rs485 settings */
>> +	int			rts_gpio;	/* optional RTS GPIO */
>>   };
>>
>>    /* Touchscreen Controller */
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>
>


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-05 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-05 12:35 [PATCH] ARM/serial: at91: switch atmel serial to use gpiolib Linus Walleij
2013-11-05 12:35 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-05 15:27 ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-05 15:27   ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-05 15:29 ` [PATCH] ARM/serial: at91: specify RTS in DT using gpio Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-05 15:29   ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-05 15:59   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-05 15:59     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-05 16:18     ` Andrew Lunn
2013-11-05 16:18       ` Andrew Lunn
2013-11-05 16:57     ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-05 16:57       ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-05 17:29   ` [PATCH v2] " Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-05 17:29     ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-05 16:28 ` [PATCH] ARM/serial: at91: switch atmel serial to use gpiolib Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-05 16:28   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-05 16:52   ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2013-11-05 16:52     ` Nicolas Ferre
2013-11-06  9:16   ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-06  9:16     ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52792262.7030803@atmel.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
    --cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linus-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@maxim.org.za \
    --cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.