Re: [PATCH 0/3] makedumpfile: hugepage filtering for vmcore dump

[HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>]

(2013/11/06 11:21), Atsushi Kumagai wrote:
> (2013/11/06 5:27), Vivek Goyal wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 09:45:32PM +0800, Jingbai Ma wrote:
>>> This patch set intend to exclude unnecessary hugepages from vmcore dump file.
>>>
>>> This patch requires the kernel patch to export necessary data structures into
>>> vmcore: "kexec: export hugepage data structure into vmcoreinfo"
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/kexec/2013-November/009997.html
>>>
>>> This patch introduce two new dump levels 32 and 64 to exclude all unused and
>>> active hugepages. The level to exclude all unnecessary pages will be 127 now.
>>
>> Interesting. Why hugepages should be treated any differentely than normal
>> pages?
>>
>> If user asked to filter out free page, then it should be filtered and
>> it should not matter whether it is a huge page or not?
>
> I'm making a RFC patch of hugepages filtering based on such policy.
>
> I attach the prototype version.
> It's able to filter out also THPs, and suitable for cyclic processing
> because it depends on mem_map and looking up it can be divided into
> cycles. This is the same idea as page_is_buddy().
>
> So I think it's better.
>

> @@ -4506,14 +4583,49 @@ __exclude_unnecessary_pages(unsigned long mem_map,
>    		    && !isAnon(mapping)) {
>    			if (clear_bit_on_2nd_bitmap_for_kernel(pfn))
>    				pfn_cache_private++;
> +			/*
> +			 * NOTE: If THP for cache is introduced, the check for
> +			 *       compound pages is needed here.
> +			 */
>    		}
>    		/*
>    		 * Exclude the data page of the user process.
>    		 */
> -		else if ((info->dump_level & DL_EXCLUDE_USER_DATA)
> -		    && isAnon(mapping)) {
> -			if (clear_bit_on_2nd_bitmap_for_kernel(pfn))
> -				pfn_user++;
> +		else if (info->dump_level & DL_EXCLUDE_USER_DATA) {
> +			/*
> +			 * Exclude the anonnymous pages as user pages.
> +			 */
> +			if (isAnon(mapping)) {
> +				if (clear_bit_on_2nd_bitmap_for_kernel(pfn))
> +					pfn_user++;
> +
> +				/*
> +				 * Check the compound page
> +				 */
> +				if (page_is_hugepage(flags) && compound_order > 0) {
> +					int i, nr_pages = 1 << compound_order;
> +
> +					for (i = 1; i < nr_pages; ++i) {
> +						if (clear_bit_on_2nd_bitmap_for_kernel(pfn + i))
> +							pfn_user++;
> +					}
> +					pfn += nr_pages - 2;
> +					mem_map += (nr_pages - 1) * SIZE(page);
> +				}
> +			}
> +			/*
> +			 * Exclude the hugetlbfs pages as user pages.
> +			 */
> +			else if (hugetlb_dtor == SYMBOL(free_huge_page)) {
> +				int i, nr_pages = 1 << compound_order;
> +
> +				for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; ++i) {
> +					if (clear_bit_on_2nd_bitmap_for_kernel(pfn + i))
> +						pfn_user++;
> +				}
> +				pfn += nr_pages - 1;
> +				mem_map += (nr_pages - 1) * SIZE(page);
> +			}
>    		}
>    		/*
>    		 * Exclude the hwpoison page.

I'm concerned about the case that filtering is not performed to part of mem_map
entries not belonging to the current cyclic range.

If maximum value of compound_order is larger than maximum value of
CONFIG_FORCE_MAX_ZONEORDER, which makedumpfile obtains by ARRAY_LENGTH(zone.free_area),
it's necessary to align info->bufsize_cyclic with larger one in
check_cyclic_buffer_overrun().

-- 
Thanks.
HATAYAMA, Daisuke


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec