From: wangweidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: vyasevich@gmail.com, nhorman@tuxdriver.com,
dingtianhong@huawei.com, davem@davemloft.net,
linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] sctp: remove the else path
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 03:07:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527C5559.6040203@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383879644.9263.62.camel@joe-AO722>
On 2013/11/8 11:00, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:55 +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
>> Make the code more simplification.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> net/sctp/associola.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
>> index 667f984..2d53d4c 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
>> @@ -954,15 +954,13 @@ int sctp_cmp_addr_exact(const union sctp_addr *ss1,
>> */
>> struct sctp_chunk *sctp_get_ecne_prepend(struct sctp_association *asoc)
>> {
>> - struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
>> + struct sctp_chunk *chunk = NULL;
>>
>> /* Send ECNE if needed.
>> * Not being able to allocate a chunk here is not deadly.
>> */
>> if (asoc->need_ecne)
>> chunk = sctp_make_ecne(asoc, asoc->last_ecne_tsn);
>> - else
>> - chunk = NULL;
>>
>> return chunk;
>> }
>
> If you really want to make the code simple how about:
>
> struct sctp_chunk *sctp_get_ecne_prepend(struct sctp_association *asoc)
> {
> if (!asoc->need_ecne)
> return NULL;
>
> return sctp_make_ecne(asoc, asoc->last_ecne_tsn);
> }
>
>
Yeah, you are right. I will fix it in v2.
Thanks.
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: wangweidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: <vyasevich@gmail.com>, <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
<dingtianhong@huawei.com>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/5] sctp: remove the else path
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 11:07:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527C5559.6040203@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383879644.9263.62.camel@joe-AO722>
On 2013/11/8 11:00, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:55 +0800, Wang Weidong wrote:
>> Make the code more simplification.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Weidong <wangweidong1@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> net/sctp/associola.c | 4 +---
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sctp/associola.c b/net/sctp/associola.c
>> index 667f984..2d53d4c 100644
>> --- a/net/sctp/associola.c
>> +++ b/net/sctp/associola.c
>> @@ -954,15 +954,13 @@ int sctp_cmp_addr_exact(const union sctp_addr *ss1,
>> */
>> struct sctp_chunk *sctp_get_ecne_prepend(struct sctp_association *asoc)
>> {
>> - struct sctp_chunk *chunk;
>> + struct sctp_chunk *chunk = NULL;
>>
>> /* Send ECNE if needed.
>> * Not being able to allocate a chunk here is not deadly.
>> */
>> if (asoc->need_ecne)
>> chunk = sctp_make_ecne(asoc, asoc->last_ecne_tsn);
>> - else
>> - chunk = NULL;
>>
>> return chunk;
>> }
>
> If you really want to make the code simple how about:
>
> struct sctp_chunk *sctp_get_ecne_prepend(struct sctp_association *asoc)
> {
> if (!asoc->need_ecne)
> return NULL;
>
> return sctp_make_ecne(asoc, asoc->last_ecne_tsn);
> }
>
>
Yeah, you are right. I will fix it in v2.
Thanks.
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-08 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-08 2:55 [PATCH net-next 0/5] sctp: fix and clean up Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] sctp: remove the duplicate initialize Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] sctp: remove the else path Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 3:00 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-08 3:00 ` Joe Perches
2013-11-08 3:07 ` wangweidong [this message]
2013-11-08 3:07 ` wangweidong
2013-11-08 18:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-11-08 19:19 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-11-11 1:57 ` wangweidong
2013-11-11 1:57 ` wangweidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] sctp: if we done update ssnmap, free the new ssnmap Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 3:49 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-08 3:49 ` Vlad Yasevich
2013-11-08 4:30 ` wangweidong
2013-11-08 4:30 ` wangweidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] sctp: convert sctp_peer_needs_update to boolean Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] sctp: fix some typos in associola.c Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 2:55 ` Wang Weidong
2013-11-08 6:41 ` [PATCH net-next 0/5] sctp: fix and clean up David Miller
2013-11-08 6:41 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527C5559.6040203@huawei.com \
--to=wangweidong1@huawei.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dingtianhong@huawei.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.