From: cov@codeaurora.org (Christopher Covington)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:48:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527D15E8.6070802@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383852042-10780-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Hi Stephen,
On 11/07/2013 02:20 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> If we're running on a v7 ARM CPU, detect if the CPU supports the
> sdiv/udiv instructions and replace the signed and unsigned
> division library functions with an sdiv/udiv instruction.
[...]
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/div-v7.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +/* Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/static_key.h>
> +
> +extern int ___aeabi_idiv(int, int);
> +extern unsigned ___aeabi_uidiv(int, int);
Why are the input parameters signed?
> +extern struct static_key cpu_has_idiv;
> +
> +int __aeabi_idiv(int numerator, int denominator)
> +{
> + if (static_key_false(&cpu_has_idiv)) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + asm volatile (
> + ".arch_extension idiv\n"
> + "sdiv %0, %1, %2"
> + : "=&r" (ret)
> + : "r" (numerator), "r" (denominator));
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ___aeabi_idiv(numerator, denominator);
> +}
> +
> +int __divsi3(int numerator, int denominator)
> + __attribute__((alias("__aeabi_idiv")));
> +
> +unsigned __aeabi_uidiv(int numerator, int denominator)
Unsigned inputs?
> +{
> + if (static_key_false(&cpu_has_idiv)) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + asm volatile (
> + ".arch_extension idiv\n"
> + "udiv %0, %1, %2"
> + : "=&r" (ret)
> + : "r" (numerator), "r" (denominator));
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ___aeabi_uidiv(numerator, denominator);
> +}
> +
> +unsigned __udivsi3(int numerator, int denominator)
> + __attribute__((alias("__aeabi_uidiv")));
Unsigned inputs?
[...]
Thanks,
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 11:48:40 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <527D15E8.6070802@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1383852042-10780-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Hi Stephen,
On 11/07/2013 02:20 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> If we're running on a v7 ARM CPU, detect if the CPU supports the
> sdiv/udiv instructions and replace the signed and unsigned
> division library functions with an sdiv/udiv instruction.
[...]
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/div-v7.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +/* Copyright (c) 2013, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 and
> + * only version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation.
> + *
> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/static_key.h>
> +
> +extern int ___aeabi_idiv(int, int);
> +extern unsigned ___aeabi_uidiv(int, int);
Why are the input parameters signed?
> +extern struct static_key cpu_has_idiv;
> +
> +int __aeabi_idiv(int numerator, int denominator)
> +{
> + if (static_key_false(&cpu_has_idiv)) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + asm volatile (
> + ".arch_extension idiv\n"
> + "sdiv %0, %1, %2"
> + : "=&r" (ret)
> + : "r" (numerator), "r" (denominator));
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ___aeabi_idiv(numerator, denominator);
> +}
> +
> +int __divsi3(int numerator, int denominator)
> + __attribute__((alias("__aeabi_idiv")));
> +
> +unsigned __aeabi_uidiv(int numerator, int denominator)
Unsigned inputs?
> +{
> + if (static_key_false(&cpu_has_idiv)) {
> + int ret;
> +
> + asm volatile (
> + ".arch_extension idiv\n"
> + "udiv %0, %1, %2"
> + : "=&r" (ret)
> + : "r" (numerator), "r" (denominator));
> +
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return ___aeabi_uidiv(numerator, denominator);
> +}
> +
> +unsigned __udivsi3(int numerator, int denominator)
> + __attribute__((alias("__aeabi_uidiv")));
Unsigned inputs?
[...]
Thanks,
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-08 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-07 19:20 [PATCH] ARM: Use udiv/sdiv for __aeabi_{u}idiv library functions Stephen Boyd
2013-11-07 19:20 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-08 1:34 ` Rob Herring
2013-11-08 1:34 ` Rob Herring
2013-11-08 11:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-08 11:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-08 16:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-08 16:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-08 18:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-08 18:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-08 9:58 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-08 9:58 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2013-11-08 16:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-08 16:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-11-08 18:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-08 18:53 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-08 16:48 ` Christopher Covington [this message]
2013-11-08 16:48 ` Christopher Covington
2013-11-08 18:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-08 18:51 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-08 17:02 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-08 17:02 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-11-08 19:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-11-08 19:04 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=527D15E8.6070802@codeaurora.org \
--to=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.