From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC 4/6] arm64: Add kernel return probes support(kretprobes)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:53:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52808CFC.6060701@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b37P2aeXs4Cy_HxF24HQAYAnYzZ19PgV6rqrQLY9SMpZHDJg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/11/2013 01:29 PM, Sandeepa Prabhu wrote:
> On 8 November 2013 22:34, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>>> +static inline long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> + return regs->regs[0];
>>> +}
>>
>> This is also being implemented by another patch series (I think the audit
>> stuff?).
> Not sure, I did not see this being implemented in audit(audit adds for
> 'syscallno', not for return value in x0)
> I can rebase my code if this change is implemented and queued in other patchset.
Yes, my audit patch has it.
The definition is referred to in include/linux/audit.h (and ptrace.h),
too.
-Takahiro AKASHI
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>
To: Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@linaro.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: "linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
"steve.capper@linaro.org" <steve.capper@linaro.org>,
"srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com"
<Vijaya.Kumar@caviumnetworks.com>,
"nico@linaro.org" <nico@linaro.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@goodmis.org" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"dsaxena@linaro.org" <dsaxena@linaro.org>,
"masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com"
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"jiang.liu@huawei.com" <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/6] arm64: Add kernel return probes support(kretprobes)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:53:32 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52808CFC.6060701@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b37P2aeXs4Cy_HxF24HQAYAnYzZ19PgV6rqrQLY9SMpZHDJg@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/11/2013 01:29 PM, Sandeepa Prabhu wrote:
> On 8 November 2013 22:34, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>>> +static inline long regs_return_value(struct pt_regs *regs)
>>> +{
>>> + return regs->regs[0];
>>> +}
>>
>> This is also being implemented by another patch series (I think the audit
>> stuff?).
> Not sure, I did not see this being implemented in audit(audit adds for
> 'syscallno', not for return value in x0)
> I can rebase my code if this change is implemented and queued in other patchset.
Yes, my audit patch has it.
The definition is referred to in include/linux/audit.h (and ptrace.h),
too.
-Takahiro AKASHI
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-11 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-17 11:17 [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] ARM64: Add kernel probes(Kprobes) support Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC v4 1/6] arm64: support single-step and breakpoint handler hooks Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-25 15:22 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-25 15:22 ` Will Deacon
2013-12-03 14:33 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-03 14:33 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-12-03 19:44 ` Will Deacon
2013-12-03 19:44 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 2/6] arm64: Kprobes with single stepping support Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-08 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-08 16:56 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-09 9:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-09 9:10 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 5:39 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 5:39 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 7:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 7:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 10:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 10:51 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 10:58 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 10:58 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 17:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-11 17:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 6:23 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 6:23 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 7:27 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 7:27 ` Re: " Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 8:44 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 8:44 ` Re: " Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 10:17 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 10:17 ` Re: Re: " Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 10:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 10:55 ` Re: Re: " Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 14:11 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 14:11 ` Re: Re: Re: " Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-12 16:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-12 16:59 ` Steven Rostedt
2013-11-13 16:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-13 16:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-13 6:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13 7:08 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13 7:08 ` Re: " Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13 14:07 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-13 14:07 ` Re: Re: " Masami Hiramatsu
2013-11-13 14:31 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-13 14:31 ` Re: " Will Deacon
2013-11-13 15:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13 15:55 ` Re: " Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-15 16:39 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-15 16:39 ` Re: " Will Deacon
2013-11-18 6:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-18 6:55 ` Re: " Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-18 8:51 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-18 8:51 ` Re: " Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-13 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-13 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-11-13 14:20 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-13 14:20 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 5:35 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 5:35 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 11:21 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 11:21 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-12 6:52 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-12 6:52 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-15 16:37 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-15 16:37 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-18 6:43 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-18 6:43 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 3/6] arm64: Kprobes instruction simulation support Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-08 17:03 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-08 17:03 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 5:58 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 5:58 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 4/6] arm64: Add kernel return probes support(kretprobes) Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-08 17:04 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-08 17:04 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-11 4:29 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 4:29 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 7:53 ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2013-11-11 7:53 ` AKASHI Takahiro
2013-11-11 8:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-11 8:55 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 5/6] arm64: Enable kprobes support for arm64 platform Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` [PATCH RFC 6/6] kprobes: Add cases for arm and arm64 in sample module Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-17 11:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-25 15:24 ` Will Deacon
2013-10-25 15:24 ` Will Deacon
2013-11-06 11:05 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-11-06 11:05 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-18 8:32 ` [PATCH RFC v2 0/6] ARM64: Add kernel probes(Kprobes) support Masami Hiramatsu
2013-10-18 8:32 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-10-21 4:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
2013-10-21 4:17 ` Sandeepa Prabhu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52808CFC.6060701@linaro.org \
--to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.