[PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Prabhakar Lad]

From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
and offset check for unbanked gpio.

Lad, Prabhakar (2):
  gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
  ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
    davinci_gpio_register() call

 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c |    2 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c    |    4 +++-
 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Prabhakar Lad]

From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
and offset check for unbanked gpio.

Lad, Prabhakar (2):
  gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
  ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
    davinci_gpio_register() call

 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c |    2 +-
 drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c    |    4 +++-
 5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio

[Prabhakar Lad]

From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

This patch fixes a check for offset in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
and also assigns gpio_irq, gpio_unbanked of chips[0] to
appropriate values which is used in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
function.

Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 8847adf..84be701 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 	 * NOTE:  we assume for now that only irqs in the first gpio_chip
 	 * can provide direct-mapped IRQs to AINTC (up to 32 GPIOs).
 	 */
-	if (offset < d->irq_base)
+	if (offset < d->gpio_unbanked)
 		return d->gpio_irq + offset;
 	else
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 		/* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */
 		chips[0].chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked;
+		chips[0].gpio_irq = bank_irq;
+		chips[0].gpio_unbanked = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
 		binten = BIT(0);
 
 		/* AINTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio

[Prabhakar Lad]

From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

This patch fixes a check for offset in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
and also assigns gpio_irq, gpio_unbanked of chips[0] to
appropriate values which is used in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
function.

Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c |    4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
index 8847adf..84be701 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 	 * NOTE:  we assume for now that only irqs in the first gpio_chip
 	 * can provide direct-mapped IRQs to AINTC (up to 32 GPIOs).
 	 */
-	if (offset < d->irq_base)
+	if (offset < d->gpio_unbanked)
 		return d->gpio_irq + offset;
 	else
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 		/* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */
 		chips[0].chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked;
+		chips[0].gpio_irq = bank_irq;
+		chips[0].gpio_unbanked = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
 		binten = BIT(0);
 
 		/* AINTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio

[Sekhar Nori]

On Friday 08 November 2013 12:15 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
> This patch fixes a check for offset in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
> and also assigns gpio_irq, gpio_unbanked of chips[0] to
> appropriate values which is used in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
> function.
> 
> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

You should note explicitly that this patch fixes broken unbanked IRQ
support. You mostly just described what you are doing.

I will fixup while committing.

Thanks,
Sekhar

> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index 8847adf..84be701 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>  	 * NOTE:  we assume for now that only irqs in the first gpio_chip
>  	 * can provide direct-mapped IRQs to AINTC (up to 32 GPIOs).
>  	 */
> -	if (offset < d->irq_base)
> +	if (offset < d->gpio_unbanked)
>  		return d->gpio_irq + offset;
>  	else
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  		/* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */
>  		chips[0].chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked;
> +		chips[0].gpio_irq = bank_irq;
> +		chips[0].gpio_unbanked = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
>  		binten = BIT(0);
>  
>  		/* AINTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio

[Sekhar Nori]

On Friday 08 November 2013 12:15 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> 
> This patch fixes a check for offset in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
> and also assigns gpio_irq, gpio_unbanked of chips[0] to
> appropriate values which is used in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
> function.
> 
> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

You should note explicitly that this patch fixes broken unbanked IRQ
support. You mostly just described what you are doing.

I will fixup while committing.

Thanks,
Sekhar

> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index 8847adf..84be701 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>  	 * NOTE:  we assume for now that only irqs in the first gpio_chip
>  	 * can provide direct-mapped IRQs to AINTC (up to 32 GPIOs).
>  	 */
> -	if (offset < d->irq_base)
> +	if (offset < d->gpio_unbanked)
>  		return d->gpio_irq + offset;
>  	else
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  		/* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */
>  		chips[0].chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked;
> +		chips[0].gpio_irq = bank_irq;
> +		chips[0].gpio_unbanked = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
>  		binten = BIT(0);
>  
>  		/* AINTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */
> 

[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio

[Sekhar Nori]

On Friday 08 November 2013 12:15 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> 
> This patch fixes a check for offset in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
> and also assigns gpio_irq, gpio_unbanked of chips[0] to
> appropriate values which is used in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
> function.
> 
> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

You should note explicitly that this patch fixes broken unbanked IRQ
support. You mostly just described what you are doing.

I will fixup while committing.

Thanks,
Sekhar

> ---
>  drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c |    4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> index 8847adf..84be701 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c
> @@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int gpio_to_irq_unbanked(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
>  	 * NOTE:  we assume for now that only irqs in the first gpio_chip
>  	 * can provide direct-mapped IRQs to AINTC (up to 32 GPIOs).
>  	 */
> -	if (offset < d->irq_base)
> +	if (offset < d->gpio_unbanked)
>  		return d->gpio_irq + offset;
>  	else
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -419,6 +419,8 @@ static int davinci_gpio_irq_setup(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  		/* pass "bank 0" GPIO IRQs to AINTC */
>  		chips[0].chip.to_irq = gpio_to_irq_unbanked;
> +		chips[0].gpio_irq = bank_irq;
> +		chips[0].gpio_unbanked = pdata->gpio_unbanked;
>  		binten = BIT(0);
>  
>  		/* AINTC handles mask/unmask; GPIO handles triggering */
> 

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:
> On Friday 08 November 2013 12:15 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>
>> This patch fixes a check for offset in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
>> and also assigns gpio_irq, gpio_unbanked of chips[0] to
>> appropriate values which is used in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
>> function.
>>
>> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>
> You should note explicitly that this patch fixes broken unbanked IRQ
> support. You mostly just described what you are doing.
>
> I will fixup while committing.

So you're carrying this patch Sekhar?

Thanks:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio

[Linus Walleij]

On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:
> On Friday 08 November 2013 12:15 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>
>> This patch fixes a check for offset in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
>> and also assigns gpio_irq, gpio_unbanked of chips[0] to
>> appropriate values which is used in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
>> function.
>>
>> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>
> You should note explicitly that this patch fixes broken unbanked IRQ
> support. You mostly just described what you are doing.
>
> I will fixup while committing.

So you're carrying this patch Sekhar?

Thanks:
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio

[Sekhar Nori]

On Monday 18 November 2013 04:18 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:
>> On Friday 08 November 2013 12:15 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> This patch fixes a check for offset in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
>>> and also assigns gpio_irq, gpio_unbanked of chips[0] to
>>> appropriate values which is used in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
>>> function.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>
>> You should note explicitly that this patch fixes broken unbanked IRQ
>> support. You mostly just described what you are doing.
>>
>> I will fixup while committing.
> 
> So you're carrying this patch Sekhar?

Yes, and I would have sent this for upstream already if not for I going
under the weather a bit past couple of days.

Thanks,
Sekhar

[PATCH 1/2] gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio

[Sekhar Nori]

On Monday 18 November 2013 04:18 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:18 AM, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com> wrote:
>> On Friday 08 November 2013 12:15 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> This patch fixes a check for offset in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
>>> and also assigns gpio_irq, gpio_unbanked of chips[0] to
>>> appropriate values which is used in gpio_to_irq_unbanked()
>>> function.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>
>> You should note explicitly that this patch fixes broken unbanked IRQ
>> support. You mostly just described what you are doing.
>>
>> I will fixup while committing.
> 
> So you're carrying this patch Sekhar?

Yes, and I would have sent this for upstream already if not for I going
under the weather a bit past couple of days.

Thanks,
Sekhar

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to davinci_gpio_register() call

[Prabhakar Lad]

From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

The davinci_gpio_register() function expects the number of
resources as the second parameter, but size of resources
was passed to it due to which it was causing unexpected
behaviour. This patch fixes the same by passing the
ARRAY_SIZE of resources.

Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
index ef9ff1f..536ce52 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
@@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data dm355_gpio_platform_data = {
 int __init dm355_gpio_register(void)
 {
 	return davinci_gpio_register(dm355_gpio_resources,
-				     sizeof(dm355_gpio_resources),
+				     ARRAY_SIZE(dm355_gpio_resources),
 				     &dm355_gpio_platform_data);
 }
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
index 1511a06..9c96520 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data dm365_gpio_platform_data = {
 int __init dm365_gpio_register(void)
 {
 	return davinci_gpio_register(dm365_gpio_resources,
-				     sizeof(dm365_gpio_resources),
+				     ARRAY_SIZE(dm365_gpio_resources),
 				     &dm365_gpio_platform_data);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c
index 143a321..72a3aa7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data dm644_gpio_platform_data = {
 int __init dm644x_gpio_register(void)
 {
 	return davinci_gpio_register(dm644_gpio_resources,
-				     sizeof(dm644_gpio_resources),
+				     ARRAY_SIZE(dm644_gpio_resources),
 				     &dm644_gpio_platform_data);
 }
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
index 2a73f29..d1b646c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data dm646x_gpio_platform_data = {
 int __init dm646x_gpio_register(void)
 {
 	return davinci_gpio_register(dm646x_gpio_resources,
-				     sizeof(dm646x_gpio_resources),
+				     ARRAY_SIZE(dm646x_gpio_resources),
 				     &dm646x_gpio_platform_data);
 }
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
-- 
1.7.9.5

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to davinci_gpio_register() call

[Prabhakar Lad]

From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>

The davinci_gpio_register() function expects the number of
resources as the second parameter, but size of resources
was passed to it due to which it was causing unexpected
behaviour. This patch fixes the same by passing the
ARRAY_SIZE of resources.

Reported-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c  |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c |    2 +-
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
index ef9ff1f..536ce52 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c
@@ -906,7 +906,7 @@ static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data dm355_gpio_platform_data = {
 int __init dm355_gpio_register(void)
 {
 	return davinci_gpio_register(dm355_gpio_resources,
-				     sizeof(dm355_gpio_resources),
+				     ARRAY_SIZE(dm355_gpio_resources),
 				     &dm355_gpio_platform_data);
 }
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
index 1511a06..9c96520 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data dm365_gpio_platform_data = {
 int __init dm365_gpio_register(void)
 {
 	return davinci_gpio_register(dm365_gpio_resources,
-				     sizeof(dm365_gpio_resources),
+				     ARRAY_SIZE(dm365_gpio_resources),
 				     &dm365_gpio_platform_data);
 }
 
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c
index 143a321..72a3aa7 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c
@@ -792,7 +792,7 @@ static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data dm644_gpio_platform_data = {
 int __init dm644x_gpio_register(void)
 {
 	return davinci_gpio_register(dm644_gpio_resources,
-				     sizeof(dm644_gpio_resources),
+				     ARRAY_SIZE(dm644_gpio_resources),
 				     &dm644_gpio_platform_data);
 }
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
index 2a73f29..d1b646c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ static struct davinci_gpio_platform_data dm646x_gpio_platform_data = {
 int __init dm646x_gpio_register(void)
 {
 	return davinci_gpio_register(dm646x_gpio_resources,
-				     sizeof(dm646x_gpio_resources),
+				     ARRAY_SIZE(dm646x_gpio_resources),
 				     &dm646x_gpio_platform_data);
 }
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
-- 
1.7.9.5

Re: [PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Grygorii Strashko]

Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad

On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> 
> This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
> and offset check for unbanked gpio.
> 
> Lad, Prabhakar (2):
>    gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
>    ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
>      davinci_gpio_register() call

I've verified both patches - looks ok. 
Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without issues.

Could we move forward with these patches?

> 
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c  |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c  |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c |    2 +-
>   drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c    |    4 +++-
>   5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

Re: [PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Grygorii Strashko]

Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad

On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> 
> This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
> and offset check for unbanked gpio.
> 
> Lad, Prabhakar (2):
>    gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
>    ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
>      davinci_gpio_register() call

I've verified both patches - looks ok. 
Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without issues.

Could we move forward with these patches?

> 
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c  |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c  |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c |    2 +-
>   drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c    |    4 +++-
>   5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

[PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Grygorii Strashko]

Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad

On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
> 
> This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
> and offset check for unbanked gpio.
> 
> Lad, Prabhakar (2):
>    gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
>    ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
>      davinci_gpio_register() call

I've verified both patches - looks ok. 
Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without issues.

Could we move forward with these patches?

> 
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm355.c  |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm365.c  |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm644x.c |    2 +-
>   arch/arm/mach-davinci/dm646x.c |    2 +-
>   drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c    |    4 +++-
>   5 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

Re: [PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Prabhakar Lad]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 815 bytes --]

Hi Grygorii,

On 11 Nov 2013 21:16, "Grygorii Strashko" <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad
>
> On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <
prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> >
> > This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
> > and offset check for unbanked gpio.
> >
> > Lad, Prabhakar (2):
> >    gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
> >    ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
> >      davinci_gpio_register() call
>
> I've verified both patches - looks ok.
> Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
> Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without
issues.
>
> Could we move forward with these patches?
>
Can you ACk the patches ?

Regards,
--Prabhakar

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1238 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Sekhar Nori]

On Monday 11 November 2013 09:13 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad
> 
> On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
>> and offset check for unbanked gpio.
>>
>> Lad, Prabhakar (2):
>>    gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
>>    ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
>>      davinci_gpio_register() call
> 
> I've verified both patches - looks ok. 
> Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
> Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without issues.
> 
> Could we move forward with these patches?

Prabhakar, both patches look good to me. Thanks for the fixes.

Also Grygorii, have you actually verified that the unbanked IRQ support
works? Only DM365 uses it.

What do I add for you? Tested-by: or Acked-by:

Thanks,
Sekhar

Re: [PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Sekhar Nori]

On Monday 11 November 2013 09:13 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad
> 
> On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>
>> This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
>> and offset check for unbanked gpio.
>>
>> Lad, Prabhakar (2):
>>    gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
>>    ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
>>      davinci_gpio_register() call
> 
> I've verified both patches - looks ok. 
> Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
> Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without issues.
> 
> Could we move forward with these patches?

Prabhakar, both patches look good to me. Thanks for the fixes.

Also Grygorii, have you actually verified that the unbanked IRQ support
works? Only DM365 uses it.

What do I add for you? Tested-by: or Acked-by:

Thanks,
Sekhar

[PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Sekhar Nori]

On Monday 11 November 2013 09:13 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad
> 
> On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>
>> This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
>> and offset check for unbanked gpio.
>>
>> Lad, Prabhakar (2):
>>    gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
>>    ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
>>      davinci_gpio_register() call
> 
> I've verified both patches - looks ok. 
> Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
> Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without issues.
> 
> Could we move forward with these patches?

Prabhakar, both patches look good to me. Thanks for the fixes.

Also Grygorii, have you actually verified that the unbanked IRQ support
works? Only DM365 uses it.

What do I add for you? Tested-by: or Acked-by:

Thanks,
Sekhar

Re: [PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Grygorii Strashko]

Hi Sekhar,

On 11/12/2013 08:18 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Monday 11 November 2013 09:13 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad
>>
>> On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>> This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
>>> and offset check for unbanked gpio.
>>>
>>> Lad, Prabhakar (2):
>>>     gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
>>>     ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
>>>       davinci_gpio_register() call
>>
>> I've verified both patches - looks ok.
>> Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
>> Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without issues.
>>
>> Could we move forward with these patches?
> 
> Prabhakar, both patches look good to me. Thanks for the fixes.
> 
> Also Grygorii, have you actually verified that the unbanked IRQ support
> works? Only DM365 uses it.

Yes, I've verified it, but on Keystone which has similar GPIO IP
which supports only unbanked IRQs.

> 
> What do I add for you? Tested-by: or Acked-by:

Reported-and-Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> :P
^Up to you :), but if I understand things right "Acked-by:" included all above

Regards,
- grygorii

Re: [PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Grygorii Strashko]

Hi Sekhar,

On 11/12/2013 08:18 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Monday 11 November 2013 09:13 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad
>>
>> On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
>>> and offset check for unbanked gpio.
>>>
>>> Lad, Prabhakar (2):
>>>     gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
>>>     ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
>>>       davinci_gpio_register() call
>>
>> I've verified both patches - looks ok.
>> Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
>> Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without issues.
>>
>> Could we move forward with these patches?
> 
> Prabhakar, both patches look good to me. Thanks for the fixes.
> 
> Also Grygorii, have you actually verified that the unbanked IRQ support
> works? Only DM365 uses it.

Yes, I've verified it, but on Keystone which has similar GPIO IP
which supports only unbanked IRQs.

> 
> What do I add for you? Tested-by: or Acked-by:

Reported-and-Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> :P
^Up to you :), but if I understand things right "Acked-by:" included all above

Regards,
- grygorii

[PATCH 0/2] DaVinci: GPIO: fixes

[Grygorii Strashko]

Hi Sekhar,

On 11/12/2013 08:18 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
> On Monday 11 November 2013 09:13 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> Hi Sekhar, Prabhakar Lad
>>
>> On 11/08/2013 08:45 AM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> This patch series fixes gpio driver regestration
>>> and offset check for unbanked gpio.
>>>
>>> Lad, Prabhakar (2):
>>>     gpio: davinci: Fix a check for unbanked gpio
>>>     ARM: davinci: Fix number of resources passed to
>>>       davinci_gpio_register() call
>>
>> I've verified both patches - looks ok.
>> Patch 1 - restores unbanked GPIO IRQs functionality
>> Patch 2 - allows to register GPIO Platform devices and boot without issues.
>>
>> Could we move forward with these patches?
> 
> Prabhakar, both patches look good to me. Thanks for the fixes.
> 
> Also Grygorii, have you actually verified that the unbanked IRQ support
> works? Only DM365 uses it.

Yes, I've verified it, but on Keystone which has similar GPIO IP
which supports only unbanked IRQs.

> 
> What do I add for you? Tested-by: or Acked-by:

Reported-and-Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> :P
^Up to you :), but if I understand things right "Acked-by:" included all above

Regards,
- grygorii