* i210 performance ?
[not found] ` <mailman.0.1384159076.18289.dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
@ 2013-11-12 8:51 ` Armin Steinhoff
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Armin Steinhoff @ 2013-11-12 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw
Hi All,
after porting Intel's Data Plan to QNX 6.5 I'm doing some performance
test with "testpmd".
I'm using a single i210 board installed on a dual core QNX 6.5 machine
and using "testpmd" as a packet generator (UDP packets).
The test are done with:
start: testpmd -c 3 -n -> interactive mode by default
set burst 1
set fwd txonly
start
stop
Without a delay between packets I see a huge number of dropped packets.
After introducing a delay of 60us after sending the "packet burst"
dropping of packets doesn't happen.
My questions are: why dropps the i210 packets ? Is it because of the
fact that probably all send descriptors are occupied ?
Best Regards
Armin Steinhoff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-11-12 8:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <mailman.0.1384159076.18289.dev@dpdk.org>
[not found] ` <mailman.0.1384159076.18289.dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-12 8:51 ` i210 performance ? Armin Steinhoff
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.