All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] genirq: Add an accessor for IRQ_PER_CPU flag
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:08:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528387CF.5090105@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384340725-26073-2-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com>

Hi Vinayak,

On 13/11/13 11:05, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> This patch adds an accessor function for IRQ_PER_CPU flag.
> The accessor function is useful to dertermine whether an IRQ is percpu or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/irqdesc.h |    8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> index 56fb646..acd8a3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,14 @@ static inline int irq_balancing_disabled(unsigned int irq)
>  	return desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_NO_BALANCING_MASK;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int irq_is_percpu(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
> +
> +	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +	return (desc && (desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU)) ? 1 : 0;

I don't think it is worth checking for the validity of "desc" here. All
the other accessors assume that you've not passed a stupid "irq" value.

Simply having
	return !!(desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU);
should be enough.

> +}
> +
>  static inline void
>  irq_set_lockdep_class(unsigned int irq, struct lock_class_key *class)
>  {
> 

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"patches@apm.com" <patches@apm.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	"jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] genirq: Add an accessor for IRQ_PER_CPU flag
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:08:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528387CF.5090105@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384340725-26073-2-git-send-email-vkale@apm.com>

Hi Vinayak,

On 13/11/13 11:05, Vinayak Kale wrote:
> This patch adds an accessor function for IRQ_PER_CPU flag.
> The accessor function is useful to dertermine whether an IRQ is percpu or not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vinayak Kale <vkale@apm.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/irqdesc.h |    8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> index 56fb646..acd8a3f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
> @@ -152,6 +152,14 @@ static inline int irq_balancing_disabled(unsigned int irq)
>  	return desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_NO_BALANCING_MASK;
>  }
>  
> +static inline int irq_is_percpu(unsigned int irq)
> +{
> +	struct irq_desc *desc;
> +
> +	desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
> +	return (desc && (desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU)) ? 1 : 0;

I don't think it is worth checking for the validity of "desc" here. All
the other accessors assume that you've not passed a stupid "irq" value.

Simply having
	return !!(desc->status_use_accessors & IRQ_PER_CPU);
should be enough.

> +}
> +
>  static inline void
>  irq_set_lockdep_class(unsigned int irq, struct lock_class_key *class)
>  {
> 

Cheers,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-13 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13 11:05 [PATCH V2 0/2] genirq: arm64: perf: support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 11:05 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 11:05 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] genirq: Add an accessor for IRQ_PER_CPU flag Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 11:05   ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 14:08   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2013-11-13 14:08     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-11-14 10:31     ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-14 10:31       ` Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 11:05 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] arm64: perf: add support for percpu pmu interrupt Vinayak Kale
2013-11-13 11:05   ` Vinayak Kale

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=528387CF.5090105@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.