All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: ux500: decomission the non-DT MTU init sequence
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:33:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528BF535.1030504@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdab=1xJtcAg-_oUBr_jC5DgDre-f9jxuzDnZmXGFShvLw@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/19/2013 11:55 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 11/19/2013 10:27 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>>> -       if (!of_have_populated_dt())
>>> -               nmdk_timer_init(mtu_timer_base, IRQ_MTU0);
>>
>> If no timer have been defined in the dt [or wrongly defined], is there a
>> message to tell the user what is wrong ?
>
> Isn't that a question to be asked about a whole lot of such
> clocksource drivers and ARM platforms?

Yes, I did the comment based on your patch but I agree it must be 
addressed in a global manner.

> Most DT-only ARM platforms rely on
> arch/arm/kernel/time.c to call clocksource_of_init() if the
> machine_desc->init_time() hook is not set and has zero
> code to handle any such situation.
>
> So I guess what you're asking is whether we should patch
> clocksource_of_init() to warn if it cannot find any
> matching clock sources, like this:
>
>  From e55cf038b238d96b28d9fb01b5b6cdf345990d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:52:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] clksrc-of: warn if no clock sources are found
>
> Many platforms rely on clocksource_of_init() being implicitly
> called for registering clock sources and will get zero warnings
> if no working clock source is available. Let's print a critical
> error message if no clock source is found.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yes, it sounds right to do this.

Thanks !

   -- Daniel

> ---
>   drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
> index 35639cf4e5a2..a30b42c3ac3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ void __init clocksource_of_init(void)
>       struct device_node *np;
>       const struct of_device_id *match;
>       clocksource_of_init_fn init_func;
> +    unsigned clocksources = 0;
>
>       for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, __clksrc_of_table, &match) {
>           if (!of_device_is_available(np))
> @@ -36,5 +37,8 @@ void __init clocksource_of_init(void)
>           init_func = match->data;
>           init_func(np);
>           of_node_put(np);
> +        clocksources++;
>       }
> +    if (!clocksources)
> +        pr_crit("%s: no matching clocksources found\n", __func__);
>   }
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: ux500: decomission the non-DT MTU init sequence
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:33:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528BF535.1030504@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdab=1xJtcAg-_oUBr_jC5DgDre-f9jxuzDnZmXGFShvLw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

On 11/19/2013 11:55 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> On 11/19/2013 10:27 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>>> -       if (!of_have_populated_dt())
>>> -               nmdk_timer_init(mtu_timer_base, IRQ_MTU0);
>>
>> If no timer have been defined in the dt [or wrongly defined], is there a
>> message to tell the user what is wrong ?
>
> Isn't that a question to be asked about a whole lot of such
> clocksource drivers and ARM platforms?

Yes, I did the comment based on your patch but I agree it must be 
addressed in a global manner.

> Most DT-only ARM platforms rely on
> arch/arm/kernel/time.c to call clocksource_of_init() if the
> machine_desc->init_time() hook is not set and has zero
> code to handle any such situation.
>
> So I guess what you're asking is whether we should patch
> clocksource_of_init() to warn if it cannot find any
> matching clock sources, like this:
>
>  From e55cf038b238d96b28d9fb01b5b6cdf345990d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:52:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] clksrc-of: warn if no clock sources are found
>
> Many platforms rely on clocksource_of_init() being implicitly
> called for registering clock sources and will get zero warnings
> if no working clock source is available. Let's print a critical
> error message if no clock source is found.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Yes, it sounds right to do this.

Thanks !

   -- Daniel

> ---
>   drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
> index 35639cf4e5a2..a30b42c3ac3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ void __init clocksource_of_init(void)
>       struct device_node *np;
>       const struct of_device_id *match;
>       clocksource_of_init_fn init_func;
> +    unsigned clocksources = 0;
>
>       for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, __clksrc_of_table, &match) {
>           if (!of_device_is_available(np))
> @@ -36,5 +37,8 @@ void __init clocksource_of_init(void)
>           init_func = match->data;
>           init_func(np);
>           of_node_put(np);
> +        clocksources++;
>       }
> +    if (!clocksources)
> +        pr_crit("%s: no matching clocksources found\n", __func__);
>   }
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: ux500: decomission the non-DT MTU init sequence
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 00:33:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <528BF535.1030504@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdab=1xJtcAg-_oUBr_jC5DgDre-f9jxuzDnZmXGFShvLw@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/19/2013 11:55 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 11/19/2013 10:27 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>>> -       if (!of_have_populated_dt())
>>> -               nmdk_timer_init(mtu_timer_base, IRQ_MTU0);
>>
>> If no timer have been defined in the dt [or wrongly defined], is there a
>> message to tell the user what is wrong ?
>
> Isn't that a question to be asked about a whole lot of such
> clocksource drivers and ARM platforms?

Yes, I did the comment based on your patch but I agree it must be 
addressed in a global manner.

> Most DT-only ARM platforms rely on
> arch/arm/kernel/time.c to call clocksource_of_init() if the
> machine_desc->init_time() hook is not set and has zero
> code to handle any such situation.
>
> So I guess what you're asking is whether we should patch
> clocksource_of_init() to warn if it cannot find any
> matching clock sources, like this:
>
>  From e55cf038b238d96b28d9fb01b5b6cdf345990d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 23:52:56 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] clksrc-of: warn if no clock sources are found
>
> Many platforms rely on clocksource_of_init() being implicitly
> called for registering clock sources and will get zero warnings
> if no working clock source is available. Let's print a critical
> error message if no clock source is found.
>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yes, it sounds right to do this.

Thanks !

   -- Daniel

> ---
>   drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c | 4 ++++
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
> index 35639cf4e5a2..a30b42c3ac3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/clksrc-of.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ void __init clocksource_of_init(void)
>       struct device_node *np;
>       const struct of_device_id *match;
>       clocksource_of_init_fn init_func;
> +    unsigned clocksources = 0;
>
>       for_each_matching_node_and_match(np, __clksrc_of_table, &match) {
>           if (!of_device_is_available(np))
> @@ -36,5 +37,8 @@ void __init clocksource_of_init(void)
>           init_func = match->data;
>           init_func(np);
>           of_node_put(np);
> +        clocksources++;
>       }
> +    if (!clocksources)
> +        pr_crit("%s: no matching clocksources found\n", __func__);
>   }
>


-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2013-11-19 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-19 21:27 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: ux500: decomission the non-DT MTU init sequence Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 21:27 ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 22:40 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-11-19 22:40   ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-11-19 22:55   ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 22:55     ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 22:55     ` Linus Walleij
2013-11-19 23:33     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2013-11-19 23:33       ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-11-19 23:33       ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-11-20  8:55 ` Lee Jones
2013-11-20  8:55   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=528BF535.1030504@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.