From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: Query KVM for available memory slots
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:41:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52932949.1030401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131125111609.5eeaba97@oc7435384737.ibm.com>
Il 25/11/2013 11:16, Thomas Huth ha scritto:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:12:44 -0700
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> KVM reports the number of available memory slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS)
>> using the extension interface. Both x86 and s390 implement this, ARM
>> and powerpc do not yet enable it. Convert the static slots array to
>> be dynamically allocated, supporting more slots when available.
>> Default to 32 when KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS is not implemented. The
>> motivation for this change is to support more assigned devices, where
>> memory mapped PCI MMIO BARs typically take one slot each.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> kvm-all.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
>> index 4478969..63c4e9b 100644
>> --- a/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ typedef struct kvm_dirty_log KVMDirtyLog;
>>
>> struct KVMState
>> {
>> - KVMSlot slots[32];
>> + KVMSlot *slots;
>> + int nr_slots;
>> int fd;
>> int vmfd;
>> int coalesced_mmio;
>> @@ -125,7 +126,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_alloc_slot(KVMState *s)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> if (s->slots[i].memory_size == 0) {
>> return &s->slots[i];
>> }
>> @@ -141,7 +142,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_matching_slot(KVMState *s,
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
>>
>> if (start_addr == mem->start_addr &&
>> @@ -163,7 +164,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_overlapping_slot(KVMState *s,
>> KVMSlot *found = NULL;
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
>>
>> if (mem->memory_size == 0 ||
>> @@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram,
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
>>
>> if (ram >= mem->ram && ram < mem->ram + mem->memory_size) {
>> @@ -357,7 +358,7 @@ static int kvm_set_migration_log(int enable)
>>
>> s->migration_log = enable;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> mem = &s->slots[i];
>>
>> if (!mem->memory_size) {
>> @@ -1383,9 +1384,6 @@ int kvm_init(void)
>> #ifdef KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
>> QTAILQ_INIT(&s->kvm_sw_breakpoints);
>> #endif
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> - s->slots[i].slot = i;
>> - }
>> s->vmfd = -1;
>> s->fd = qemu_open("/dev/kvm", O_RDWR);
>> if (s->fd == -1) {
>> @@ -1409,6 +1407,19 @@ int kvm_init(void)
>> goto err;
>> }
>>
>> + s->nr_slots = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
>> +
>> + /* If unspecified, use the previous default value */
>
> I'd remove the "previous" in the comment here, because if you look at
> this code in a couple of years, nobody will remember what "previous" is
> refering to here.
>
>> + if (!s->nr_slots) {
>> + s->nr_slots = 32;
>> + }
>> +
>> + s->slots = g_malloc0(s->nr_slots * sizeof(KVMSlot));
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> + s->slots[i].slot = i;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* check the vcpu limits */
>> soft_vcpus_limit = kvm_recommended_vcpus(s);
>> hard_vcpus_limit = kvm_max_vcpus(s);
>> @@ -1527,6 +1538,7 @@ err:
>> if (s->fd != -1) {
>> close(s->fd);
>> }
>> + g_free(s->slots);
>> g_free(s);
>>
>> return ret;
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks, applied to uq/master with your suggested change.
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
gleb@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] kvm: Query KVM for available memory slots
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 11:41:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52932949.1030401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131125111609.5eeaba97@oc7435384737.ibm.com>
Il 25/11/2013 11:16, Thomas Huth ha scritto:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 12:12:44 -0700
> Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> KVM reports the number of available memory slots (KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS)
>> using the extension interface. Both x86 and s390 implement this, ARM
>> and powerpc do not yet enable it. Convert the static slots array to
>> be dynamically allocated, supporting more slots when available.
>> Default to 32 when KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS is not implemented. The
>> motivation for this change is to support more assigned devices, where
>> memory mapped PCI MMIO BARs typically take one slot each.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> kvm-all.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kvm-all.c b/kvm-all.c
>> index 4478969..63c4e9b 100644
>> --- a/kvm-all.c
>> +++ b/kvm-all.c
>> @@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ typedef struct kvm_dirty_log KVMDirtyLog;
>>
>> struct KVMState
>> {
>> - KVMSlot slots[32];
>> + KVMSlot *slots;
>> + int nr_slots;
>> int fd;
>> int vmfd;
>> int coalesced_mmio;
>> @@ -125,7 +126,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_alloc_slot(KVMState *s)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> if (s->slots[i].memory_size == 0) {
>> return &s->slots[i];
>> }
>> @@ -141,7 +142,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_matching_slot(KVMState *s,
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
>>
>> if (start_addr == mem->start_addr &&
>> @@ -163,7 +164,7 @@ static KVMSlot *kvm_lookup_overlapping_slot(KVMState *s,
>> KVMSlot *found = NULL;
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
>>
>> if (mem->memory_size == 0 ||
>> @@ -185,7 +186,7 @@ int kvm_physical_memory_addr_from_host(KVMState *s, void *ram,
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> KVMSlot *mem = &s->slots[i];
>>
>> if (ram >= mem->ram && ram < mem->ram + mem->memory_size) {
>> @@ -357,7 +358,7 @@ static int kvm_set_migration_log(int enable)
>>
>> s->migration_log = enable;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> mem = &s->slots[i];
>>
>> if (!mem->memory_size) {
>> @@ -1383,9 +1384,6 @@ int kvm_init(void)
>> #ifdef KVM_CAP_SET_GUEST_DEBUG
>> QTAILQ_INIT(&s->kvm_sw_breakpoints);
>> #endif
>> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(s->slots); i++) {
>> - s->slots[i].slot = i;
>> - }
>> s->vmfd = -1;
>> s->fd = qemu_open("/dev/kvm", O_RDWR);
>> if (s->fd == -1) {
>> @@ -1409,6 +1407,19 @@ int kvm_init(void)
>> goto err;
>> }
>>
>> + s->nr_slots = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_NR_MEMSLOTS);
>> +
>> + /* If unspecified, use the previous default value */
>
> I'd remove the "previous" in the comment here, because if you look at
> this code in a couple of years, nobody will remember what "previous" is
> refering to here.
>
>> + if (!s->nr_slots) {
>> + s->nr_slots = 32;
>> + }
>> +
>> + s->slots = g_malloc0(s->nr_slots * sizeof(KVMSlot));
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < s->nr_slots; i++) {
>> + s->slots[i].slot = i;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* check the vcpu limits */
>> soft_vcpus_limit = kvm_recommended_vcpus(s);
>> hard_vcpus_limit = kvm_max_vcpus(s);
>> @@ -1527,6 +1538,7 @@ err:
>> if (s->fd != -1) {
>> close(s->fd);
>> }
>> + g_free(s->slots);
>> g_free(s);
>>
>> return ret;
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Thanks, applied to uq/master with your suggested change.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-25 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-22 19:12 [PATCH] kvm: Query KVM for available memory slots Alex Williamson
2013-11-22 19:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alex Williamson
2013-11-25 10:16 ` Thomas Huth
2013-11-25 10:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Thomas Huth
2013-11-25 10:41 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-11-25 10:41 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52932949.1030401@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.