From: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: sd: implement proper support for sd3.0 au sizes
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:14:51 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52942E4B.9010501@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1385428585-17516-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
Hi Wolfram,
Good catch. It's right. Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 11/26/2013 10:16 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> This reverts and updates commit 77776fd0a4cc541b9a528eacc1d31ca47eb1ae7a
> ("mmc: sd: fix the maximum au_size for SD3.0"). The au_size for SD3.0
> cannot be achieved by a simple bit shift, so this needs to be
> implemented differently. Also, don't print the warning in case of 0
> since 'not defined' is different from 'invalid'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> Cc: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com>
>
> ---
>
> Only tested with non SD3.0 cards (au = 0 and au = 9). Testers for 3.0 cards
> much appreciated.
>
> drivers/mmc/core/sd.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> index 6f42050..3b5ac4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,13 @@ static const unsigned int tacc_mant[] = {
> 35, 40, 45, 50, 55, 60, 70, 80,
> };
>
> +static const unsigned int sd_au_size[] = {
> + 0, SZ_16K / 512, SZ_32K / 512, SZ_64K / 512,
> + SZ_128K / 512, SZ_256K / 512, SZ_512K / 512, SZ_1M / 512,
> + SZ_2M / 512, SZ_4M / 512, SZ_8M / 512, (SZ_8M + SZ_4M) / 512,
> + SZ_16M / 512, (SZ_16M + SZ_8M) / 512, SZ_32M / 512, SZ_64M / 512,
> +};
> +
> #define UNSTUFF_BITS(resp,start,size) \
> ({ \
> const int __size = size; \
> @@ -216,7 +223,7 @@ static int mmc_decode_scr(struct mmc_card *card)
> static int mmc_read_ssr(struct mmc_card *card)
> {
> unsigned int au, es, et, eo;
> - int err, i, max_au;
> + int err, i;
> u32 *ssr;
>
> if (!(card->csd.cmdclass & CCC_APP_SPEC)) {
> @@ -240,26 +247,25 @@ static int mmc_read_ssr(struct mmc_card *card)
> for (i = 0; i < 16; i++)
> ssr[i] = be32_to_cpu(ssr[i]);
>
> - /* SD3.0 increases max AU size to 64MB (0xF) from 4MB (0x9) */
> - max_au = card->scr.sda_spec3 ? 0xF : 0x9;
> -
> /*
> * UNSTUFF_BITS only works with four u32s so we have to offset the
> * bitfield positions accordingly.
> */
> au = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 428 - 384, 4);
> - if (au > 0 && au <= max_au) {
> - card->ssr.au = 1 << (au + 4);
> - es = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 408 - 384, 16);
> - et = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 402 - 384, 6);
> - eo = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 400 - 384, 2);
> - if (es && et) {
> - card->ssr.erase_timeout = (et * 1000) / es;
> - card->ssr.erase_offset = eo * 1000;
> + if (au) {
> + if (au <= 9 || card->scr.sda_spec3) {
> + card->ssr.au = sd_au_size[au];
> + es = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 408 - 384, 16);
> + et = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 402 - 384, 6);
> + if (es && et) {
> + eo = UNSTUFF_BITS(ssr, 400 - 384, 2);
> + card->ssr.erase_timeout = (et * 1000) / es;
> + card->ssr.erase_offset = eo * 1000;
> + }
> + } else {
> + pr_warning("%s: SD Status: Invalid Allocation Unit size.\n",
> + mmc_hostname(card->host));
> }
> - } else {
> - pr_warning("%s: SD Status: Invalid Allocation Unit "
> - "size.\n", mmc_hostname(card->host));
> }
> out:
> kfree(ssr);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-26 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-26 1:16 [PATCH] mmc: core: sd: implement proper support for sd3.0 au sizes Wolfram Sang
2013-11-26 5:14 ` Jaehoon Chung [this message]
2013-11-26 17:06 ` Wolfram Sang
2013-11-26 16:26 ` Hartley Sweeten
2013-12-18 12:30 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-13 12:41 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-13 18:04 ` Chris Ball
2014-01-13 18:46 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-01-13 19:14 ` Chris Ball
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52942E4B.9010501@samsung.com \
--to=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=hartleys@visionengravers.com \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.