* [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
@ 2013-11-26 13:40 Daniele Nicolodi
2013-11-26 13:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Nicolodi @ 2013-11-26 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xenomai
Hello,
I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
times seems completely arbitrary to me.
Cheers,
Daniele
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 13:40 [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times Daniele Nicolodi
@ 2013-11-26 13:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-26 13:59 ` Daniele Nicolodi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-11-26 13:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniele Nicolodi; +Cc: xenomai
On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
--
Gilles.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 13:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
@ 2013-11-26 13:59 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2013-11-26 14:05 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Nicolodi @ 2013-11-26 13:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: xenomai
On 26/11/2013 14:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
>> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
>> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
>> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
>
> Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
> the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
Sorry, wrong choice of words on my side. I believe that the idle time is
defined as (current time) - (modification time). Isn't it?
Still, for example, the xenomai-force repository has two branches:
"master" and "next", for which cgit shows an "Age" (which I believe
should be interpreted in the same way as "Idle") of respectively 24
hours and 3 weeks. The "Idle" field in the repository list reports 11 days.
Cheers,
Daniele
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 13:59 ` Daniele Nicolodi
@ 2013-11-26 14:05 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-26 14:12 ` Daniele Nicolodi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-11-26 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniele Nicolodi; +Cc: xenomai
On 11/26/2013 02:59 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 26/11/2013 14:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
>>> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
>>> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
>>> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
>>
>> Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
>> the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
>
> Sorry, wrong choice of words on my side. I believe that the idle time is
> defined as (current time) - (modification time). Isn't it?
>
> Still, for example, the xenomai-force repository has two branches:
> "master" and "next", for which cgit shows an "Age" (which I believe
> should be interpreted in the same way as "Idle") of respectively 24
> hours and 3 weeks. The "Idle" field in the repository list reports 11 days.
It seems you are mixing the time when the last push occurred with the
time when the last commit occurred, with git the two are not necessarily
correlated. If you look at other projects using cgit, kernel.org for
instance, you will find the same disparities.
In the case of Xenomai, most of the repositories appear to have been
pushed 11 days ago because this is the time when the repositories were
cloned from the old xenomai server to the new xenomai server.
--
Gilles.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 14:05 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
@ 2013-11-26 14:12 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2013-11-26 14:27 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Nicolodi @ 2013-11-26 14:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: xenomai
On 26/11/2013 15:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 02:59 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> On 26/11/2013 14:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
>>>> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
>>>> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
>>>> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
>>>
>>> Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
>>> the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
>>
>> Sorry, wrong choice of words on my side. I believe that the idle time is
>> defined as (current time) - (modification time). Isn't it?
>
>>
>> Still, for example, the xenomai-force repository has two branches:
>> "master" and "next", for which cgit shows an "Age" (which I believe
>> should be interpreted in the same way as "Idle") of respectively 24
>> hours and 3 weeks. The "Idle" field in the repository list reports 11 days.
>
> It seems you are mixing the time when the last push occurred with the
> time when the last commit occurred, with git the two are not necessarily
> correlated. If you look at other projects using cgit, kernel.org for
> instance, you will find the same disparities.
>
> In the case of Xenomai, most of the repositories appear to have been
> pushed 11 days ago because this is the time when the repositories were
> cloned from the old xenomai server to the new xenomai server.
I know, but how is it possible that a changeset has been pushed before
being committed? I believe that the difference is that gitweb (which
was used before) reports the time of the last push affecting any of the
branches, while cgit reporst the time of the last push affecting the
master branch only. In my opinion, the gitweb behavior is more
consistent with the git data model, but it is not a big deal.
I like to peek at xenomai development from time to time and a quick view
on the last time changes are pushed to the repositories was handy, but
not essential.
Cheers,
Daniele
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 14:12 ` Daniele Nicolodi
@ 2013-11-26 14:27 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-26 14:33 ` Daniele Nicolodi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-11-26 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniele Nicolodi; +Cc: xenomai
On 11/26/2013 03:12 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 26/11/2013 15:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 02:59 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> On 26/11/2013 14:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
>>>>> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
>>>>> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
>>>>> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
>>>> the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
>>>
>>> Sorry, wrong choice of words on my side. I believe that the idle time is
>>> defined as (current time) - (modification time). Isn't it?
>>
>>>
>>> Still, for example, the xenomai-force repository has two branches:
>>> "master" and "next", for which cgit shows an "Age" (which I believe
>>> should be interpreted in the same way as "Idle") of respectively 24
>>> hours and 3 weeks. The "Idle" field in the repository list reports 11 days.
>>
>> It seems you are mixing the time when the last push occurred with the
>> time when the last commit occurred, with git the two are not necessarily
>> correlated. If you look at other projects using cgit, kernel.org for
>> instance, you will find the same disparities.
>>
>> In the case of Xenomai, most of the repositories appear to have been
>> pushed 11 days ago because this is the time when the repositories were
>> cloned from the old xenomai server to the new xenomai server.
>
> I know, but how is it possible that a changeset has been pushed before
> being committed?
Indeed, that is strange, I will look at it. Maybe we miss some hooks
(like git-update-server).
--
Gilles.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 14:27 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
@ 2013-11-26 14:33 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2013-11-26 14:42 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Nicolodi @ 2013-11-26 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: xenomai
On 26/11/2013 15:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 03:12 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> On 26/11/2013 15:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 02:59 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>> On 26/11/2013 14:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
>>>>>> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
>>>>>> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
>>>>>> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
>>>>> the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, wrong choice of words on my side. I believe that the idle time is
>>>> defined as (current time) - (modification time). Isn't it?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Still, for example, the xenomai-force repository has two branches:
>>>> "master" and "next", for which cgit shows an "Age" (which I believe
>>>> should be interpreted in the same way as "Idle") of respectively 24
>>>> hours and 3 weeks. The "Idle" field in the repository list reports 11 days.
>>>
>>> It seems you are mixing the time when the last push occurred with the
>>> time when the last commit occurred, with git the two are not necessarily
>>> correlated. If you look at other projects using cgit, kernel.org for
>>> instance, you will find the same disparities.
>>>
>>> In the case of Xenomai, most of the repositories appear to have been
>>> pushed 11 days ago because this is the time when the repositories were
>>> cloned from the old xenomai server to the new xenomai server.
>>
>> I know, but how is it possible that a changeset has been pushed before
>> being committed?
>
> Indeed, that is strange, I will look at it. Maybe we miss some hooks
> (like git-update-server).
I think it is due to the fact that only the master branch of each
repository is looked at. I checked on gnome.org cgit instance and it
shows the same behavior. I don't know if it is configurable.
Cheers,
Daniele
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 14:33 ` Daniele Nicolodi
@ 2013-11-26 14:42 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-26 23:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-11-26 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniele Nicolodi; +Cc: xenomai
On 11/26/2013 03:33 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 26/11/2013 15:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 03:12 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> On 26/11/2013 15:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:59 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>> On 26/11/2013 14:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
>>>>>>> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
>>>>>>> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
>>>>>>> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
>>>>>> the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, wrong choice of words on my side. I believe that the idle time is
>>>>> defined as (current time) - (modification time). Isn't it?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Still, for example, the xenomai-force repository has two branches:
>>>>> "master" and "next", for which cgit shows an "Age" (which I believe
>>>>> should be interpreted in the same way as "Idle") of respectively 24
>>>>> hours and 3 weeks. The "Idle" field in the repository list reports 11 days.
>>>>
>>>> It seems you are mixing the time when the last push occurred with the
>>>> time when the last commit occurred, with git the two are not necessarily
>>>> correlated. If you look at other projects using cgit, kernel.org for
>>>> instance, you will find the same disparities.
>>>>
>>>> In the case of Xenomai, most of the repositories appear to have been
>>>> pushed 11 days ago because this is the time when the repositories were
>>>> cloned from the old xenomai server to the new xenomai server.
>>>
>>> I know, but how is it possible that a changeset has been pushed before
>>> being committed?
>>
>> Indeed, that is strange, I will look at it. Maybe we miss some hooks
>> (like git-update-server).
>
> I think it is due to the fact that only the master branch of each
> repository is looked at. I checked on gnome.org cgit instance and it
> shows the same behavior. I don't know if it is configurable.
Seems a fix exists:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.cgit/1059
Will try tonight.
--
Gilles.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 14:42 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
@ 2013-11-26 23:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-27 13:45 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2014-06-26 12:46 ` Daniele Nicolodi
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2013-11-26 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniele Nicolodi; +Cc: xenomai
On 11/26/2013 03:42 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 03:33 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>> On 26/11/2013 15:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 03:12 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>> On 26/11/2013 15:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:59 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>>> On 26/11/2013 14:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
>>>>>>>> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
>>>>>>>> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
>>>>>>>> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
>>>>>>> the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, wrong choice of words on my side. I believe that the idle time is
>>>>>> defined as (current time) - (modification time). Isn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Still, for example, the xenomai-force repository has two branches:
>>>>>> "master" and "next", for which cgit shows an "Age" (which I believe
>>>>>> should be interpreted in the same way as "Idle") of respectively 24
>>>>>> hours and 3 weeks. The "Idle" field in the repository list reports 11 days.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems you are mixing the time when the last push occurred with the
>>>>> time when the last commit occurred, with git the two are not necessarily
>>>>> correlated. If you look at other projects using cgit, kernel.org for
>>>>> instance, you will find the same disparities.
>>>>>
>>>>> In the case of Xenomai, most of the repositories appear to have been
>>>>> pushed 11 days ago because this is the time when the repositories were
>>>>> cloned from the old xenomai server to the new xenomai server.
>>>>
>>>> I know, but how is it possible that a changeset has been pushed before
>>>> being committed?
>>>
>>> Indeed, that is strange, I will look at it. Maybe we miss some hooks
>>> (like git-update-server).
>>
>> I think it is due to the fact that only the master branch of each
>> repository is looked at. I checked on gnome.org cgit instance and it
>> shows the same behavior. I don't know if it is configurable.
>
> Seems a fix exists:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.cgit/1059
>
> Will try tonight.
>
It should work now.
--
Gilles.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 23:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
@ 2013-11-27 13:45 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2014-06-26 12:46 ` Daniele Nicolodi
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Nicolodi @ 2013-11-27 13:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gilles Chanteperdrix; +Cc: xenomai
On 27/11/2013 00:37, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 03:42 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 03:33 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> I think it is due to the fact that only the master branch of each
>>> repository is looked at. I checked on gnome.org cgit instance and it
>>> shows the same behavior. I don't know if it is configurable.
>>
>> Seems a fix exists:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.cgit/1059
>>
>> Will try tonight.
>>
> It should work now.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Daniele
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2013-11-26 23:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-27 13:45 ` Daniele Nicolodi
@ 2014-06-26 12:46 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2014-06-26 17:23 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniele Nicolodi @ 2014-06-26 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xenomai
On 27/11/2013 00:37, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 03:42 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 03:33 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>> On 26/11/2013 15:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>> On 11/26/2013 03:12 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>> On 26/11/2013 15:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:59 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>>>> On 26/11/2013 14:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
>>>>>>>>> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
>>>>>>>>> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
>>>>>>>>> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
>>>>>>>> the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, wrong choice of words on my side. I believe that the idle time is
>>>>>>> defined as (current time) - (modification time). Isn't it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Still, for example, the xenomai-force repository has two branches:
>>>>>>> "master" and "next", for which cgit shows an "Age" (which I believe
>>>>>>> should be interpreted in the same way as "Idle") of respectively 24
>>>>>>> hours and 3 weeks. The "Idle" field in the repository list reports 11 days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It seems you are mixing the time when the last push occurred with the
>>>>>> time when the last commit occurred, with git the two are not necessarily
>>>>>> correlated. If you look at other projects using cgit, kernel.org for
>>>>>> instance, you will find the same disparities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the case of Xenomai, most of the repositories appear to have been
>>>>>> pushed 11 days ago because this is the time when the repositories were
>>>>>> cloned from the old xenomai server to the new xenomai server.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know, but how is it possible that a changeset has been pushed before
>>>>> being committed?
>>>>
>>>> Indeed, that is strange, I will look at it. Maybe we miss some hooks
>>>> (like git-update-server).
>>>
>>> I think it is due to the fact that only the master branch of each
>>> repository is looked at. I checked on gnome.org cgit instance and it
>>> shows the same behavior. I don't know if it is configurable.
>>
>> Seems a fix exists:
>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.cgit/1059
>>
>> Will try tonight.
>>
> It should work now.
Hello,
it seems that the generation of the cgit index page broke down recently,
the last update time is 2014-06-21 05:18:50.
Cheers,
Daniele
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times
2014-06-26 12:46 ` Daniele Nicolodi
@ 2014-06-26 17:23 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Gilles Chanteperdrix @ 2014-06-26 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniele Nicolodi, xenomai
On 06/26/2014 02:46 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
> On 27/11/2013 00:37, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>> On 11/26/2013 03:42 PM, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2013 03:33 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>> On 26/11/2013 15:27, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>> On 11/26/2013 03:12 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>>> On 26/11/2013 15:05, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:59 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 26/11/2013 14:50, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/26/2013 02:40 PM, Daniele Nicolodi wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've noticed that the new cgit web interface to the git repositories
>>>>>>>>>> does not display the correct modification times for the repository in
>>>>>>>>>> the repository list. I don't know what may cause this, the displayed
>>>>>>>>>> times seems completely arbitrary to me.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe that is because the time displayed in the repository list is not
>>>>>>>>> the modification time, but the idle time, as the title line indicates?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry, wrong choice of words on my side. I believe that the idle time is
>>>>>>>> defined as (current time) - (modification time). Isn't it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Still, for example, the xenomai-force repository has two branches:
>>>>>>>> "master" and "next", for which cgit shows an "Age" (which I believe
>>>>>>>> should be interpreted in the same way as "Idle") of respectively 24
>>>>>>>> hours and 3 weeks. The "Idle" field in the repository list reports 11 days.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems you are mixing the time when the last push occurred with the
>>>>>>> time when the last commit occurred, with git the two are not necessarily
>>>>>>> correlated. If you look at other projects using cgit, kernel.org for
>>>>>>> instance, you will find the same disparities.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> In the case of Xenomai, most of the repositories appear to have been
>>>>>>> pushed 11 days ago because this is the time when the repositories were
>>>>>>> cloned from the old xenomai server to the new xenomai server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I know, but how is it possible that a changeset has been pushed before
>>>>>> being committed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Indeed, that is strange, I will look at it. Maybe we miss some hooks
>>>>> (like git-update-server).
>>>>
>>>> I think it is due to the fact that only the master branch of each
>>>> repository is looked at. I checked on gnome.org cgit instance and it
>>>> shows the same behavior. I don't know if it is configurable.
>>>
>>> Seems a fix exists:
>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.cgit/1059
>>>
>>> Will try tonight.
>>>
>> It should work now.
>
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems that the generation of the cgit index page broke down recently,
> the last update time is 2014-06-21 05:18:50.
Indeed, it should be fixed now.
--
Gilles.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-06-26 17:23 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-26 13:40 [Xenomai] cgit repository modification times Daniele Nicolodi
2013-11-26 13:50 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-26 13:59 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2013-11-26 14:05 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-26 14:12 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2013-11-26 14:27 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-26 14:33 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2013-11-26 14:42 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-26 23:37 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
2013-11-27 13:45 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2014-06-26 12:46 ` Daniele Nicolodi
2014-06-26 17:23 ` Gilles Chanteperdrix
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.