* [mlmmj] Duplicate mail
@ 2013-11-28 13:51 Paul Fariello
2013-11-28 18:19 ` Richard Mortimer
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Paul Fariello @ 2013-11-28 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mlmmj
Hi all,
I may be wrong but mlmmj don't seems to ignore subscribers that already are in "cc" or "to" headers.
This end up with user complaining about duplicate mail.
Is there a way to avoid this behavior ? Either by tweaking customheaders, by
using a configuration I may have missed, by patching ?
Regards,
--
Paul Fariello
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [mlmmj] Duplicate mail
2013-11-28 13:51 [mlmmj] Duplicate mail Paul Fariello
@ 2013-11-28 18:19 ` Richard Mortimer
2013-11-28 21:03 ` Ben Schmidt
2013-12-02 6:52 ` G Stansfield
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Mortimer @ 2013-11-28 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mlmmj
Hi,
On 28/11/2013 13:51, Paul Fariello wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I may be wrong but mlmmj don't seems to ignore subscribers that already are in "cc" or "to" headers.
> This end up with user complaining about duplicate mail.
This isn't a problem that can be solved in general. The visible "cc" and
"to" headers are not necessarily what was used as the envelope addresses
to deliver to. There may also be "bcc" or (non-mlmmj) aliases used in
the visible headers.
By the time that the mail gets to mlmmj any original destinations will
already have been lost in intermediate mailservers so at best you are
going to be able to paper over the cracks with a solution that will work
in some (most maybe) cases but will fail in others and either the mail
will get lost or delivered twice.
>
> Is there a way to avoid this behavior ? Either by tweaking customheaders, by
> using a configuration I may have missed, by patching ?
>
Sorry. I don't have a ready answer for that.
The only way that I know is to filter on MessageID on the receiving
server. The cyrus mail suite will do that but obviously that relies on
the receiver's ISP which you will not be able to fix. Oh and it does in
theory filter out any messages that errorneously have duplicate
MessageID fields but that tends to be spam in my experience so no big loss!
Regards
Richard
>
> Regards,
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [mlmmj] Duplicate mail
2013-11-28 13:51 [mlmmj] Duplicate mail Paul Fariello
2013-11-28 18:19 ` Richard Mortimer
@ 2013-11-28 21:03 ` Ben Schmidt
2013-12-02 6:52 ` G Stansfield
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Schmidt @ 2013-11-28 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mlmmj
On 29/11/13 5:19 AM, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> On 28/11/2013 13:51, Paul Fariello wrote:
>> I may be wrong but mlmmj don't seems to ignore subscribers that
>> already are in "cc" or "to" headers. This end up with user
>> complaining about duplicate mail.
...
>> Is there a way to avoid this behavior ? Either by tweaking
>> customheaders, by using a configuration I may have missed, by
>> patching ?
>>
> Sorry. I don't have a ready answer for that.
>
> The only way that I know is to filter on MessageID on the receiving
> server. The cyrus mail suite will do that but obviously that relies on
> the receiver's ISP which you will not be able to fix. Oh and it does
> in theory filter out any messages that errorneously have duplicate
> MessageID fields but that tends to be spam in my experience so no big
> loss!
I agree it is best to deal with this at the receiving end if possible.
That said, I suppose this is similar to the "notmetoo" functionality,
and perhaps "notmetoo" could be extended to cover these cases, too, i.e.
ignore "to" and "cc" addresses as well as the "from" one when
distributing posts. It shouldn't be too hard (I wrote the notmetoo
functionality, so am fairly familiar with it.)
Open an enhancement request on the bug tracker and/or write a patch for
it if you like.
Smiles,
Ben.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [mlmmj] Duplicate mail
2013-11-28 13:51 [mlmmj] Duplicate mail Paul Fariello
2013-11-28 18:19 ` Richard Mortimer
2013-11-28 21:03 ` Ben Schmidt
@ 2013-12-02 6:52 ` G Stansfield
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: G Stansfield @ 2013-12-02 6:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mlmmj
On 28-Nov-13 8:19 PM, Richard Mortimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/11/2013 13:51, Paul Fariello wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I may be wrong but mlmmj don't seems to ignore subscribers that
>> already are in "cc" or "to" headers.
>> This end up with user complaining about duplicate mail.
> This isn't a problem that can be solved in general. The visible "cc" and
> "to" headers are not necessarily what was used as the envelope addresses
> to deliver to. There may also be "bcc" or (non-mlmmj) aliases used in
> the visible headers.
>
> By the time that the mail gets to mlmmj any original destinations will
> already have been lost in intermediate mailservers so at best you are
> going to be able to paper over the cracks with a solution that will work
> in some (most maybe) cases but will fail in others and either the mail
> will get lost or delivered twice.
>
>>
>> Is there a way to avoid this behavior ? Either by tweaking
>> customheaders, by
>> using a configuration I may have missed, by patching ?
>>
> Sorry. I don't have a ready answer for that.
>
> The only way that I know is to filter on MessageID on the receiving
> server. The cyrus mail suite will do that but obviously that relies on
> the receiver's ISP which you will not be able to fix. Oh and it does in
> theory filter out any messages that errorneously have duplicate
> MessageID fields but that tends to be spam in my experience so no big loss!
>
> Regards
>
> Richard
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>
Hi all!
Just adding a bit about my experience with duplicate mails, Bcc and
MessageID that is not mlmmj specific but is 'real world' pain in the ...
! [My setup is using OpenSUSE to fetchmail / procmail and place mail for
local users to collect on a LAN with Windows machines.]
Let fred@gmail.com send a mail To:Jack@myisp and Bcc:Jill@myisp where
both Jack and Jill are aliases and the mails are delivered to the same
POP3 box at @myisp for collection and local delivery.
gmail sends two mails, both with identical MessageID - so letting
anything reject duplicate mails based on MessageID results in a
non-delivery to one recipient.
The mail Bcc:Jill@myisp has the envelope Delivered-To:jill@myisp and I
have to check that for delivery. Unfortunately, it also has a valid
To:Jack@myisp line. So the way / sequence of checking the envelope for
delivery *beyond To: and Cc:* matters to avoid duplicate mails. If this
is not done correctly then one recipient receives multiple deliveries.
Just to complicate matters, not all mailer systems are set up to handle
Bcc: the way gmail does ..... and I give up!
So I agree with Richard - hopefully get "a solution that will work in
some (most maybe) cases".
Regards,
Geoff
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-02 6:52 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-28 13:51 [mlmmj] Duplicate mail Paul Fariello
2013-11-28 18:19 ` Richard Mortimer
2013-11-28 21:03 ` Ben Schmidt
2013-12-02 6:52 ` G Stansfield
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.