From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"haoxudong.hao@gmail.com" <haoxudong.hao@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] X86: Intel MPX definiation
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:39:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529CC5BB.7080702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DE8DF0795D48FD4CA783C40EC8292335013F60D2@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Il 02/12/2013 17:43, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
> From fbfa537f690eca139a96c6b2636ab5130bf57716 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:27:00 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] X86: Intel MPX definiation
>
> Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 89270b4..1b00b01 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_ERMS (9*32+ 9) /* Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB */
> #define X86_FEATURE_INVPCID (9*32+10) /* Invalidate Processor Context ID */
> #define X86_FEATURE_RTM (9*32+11) /* Restricted Transactional Memory */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_MPX (9*32+14) /* Memory Protection Extension */
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDSEED (9*32+18) /* The RDSEED instruction */
> #define X86_FEATURE_ADX (9*32+19) /* The ADCX and ADOX instructions */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SMAP (9*32+20) /* Supervisor Mode Access Prevention */
> @@ -330,6 +331,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_power_flags[32];
> #define cpu_has_perfctr_l2 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_L2)
> #define cpu_has_cx8 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8)
> #define cpu_has_cx16 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX16)
> +#define cpu_has_mpx boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MPX)
> #define cpu_has_eager_fpu boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU)
> #define cpu_has_topoext boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
> index 0415cda..d3e3ea5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #define XSTATE_FP 0x1
> #define XSTATE_SSE 0x2
> #define XSTATE_YMM 0x4
> +#define XSTATE_BNDREGS 0x8
> +#define XSTATE_BNDCSR 0x10
>
> #define XSTATE_FPSSE (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE)
>
> @@ -23,7 +25,8 @@
> /*
> * These are the features that the OS can handle currently.
> */
> -#define XCNTXT_MASK (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM)
> +#define XCNTXT_MASK (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM | \
> + XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> #define REX_PREFIX "0x48, "
>
The patches look good. Please include a cover letter (patch 0/n) next
time, and detail the changes from previous submissions.
It would also be nice to have support of the new feature for nested VMX
as well (including kvm-unit-tests coverage).
Paolo
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
Cc: "haoxudong.hao@gmail.com" <haoxudong.hao@gmail.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] X86: Intel MPX definiation
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:39:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529CC5BB.7080702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DE8DF0795D48FD4CA783C40EC8292335013F60D2@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Il 02/12/2013 17:43, Liu, Jinsong ha scritto:
> From fbfa537f690eca139a96c6b2636ab5130bf57716 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 01:27:00 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] X86: Intel MPX definiation
>
> Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
> arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 89270b4..1b00b01 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_ERMS (9*32+ 9) /* Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB */
> #define X86_FEATURE_INVPCID (9*32+10) /* Invalidate Processor Context ID */
> #define X86_FEATURE_RTM (9*32+11) /* Restricted Transactional Memory */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_MPX (9*32+14) /* Memory Protection Extension */
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDSEED (9*32+18) /* The RDSEED instruction */
> #define X86_FEATURE_ADX (9*32+19) /* The ADCX and ADOX instructions */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SMAP (9*32+20) /* Supervisor Mode Access Prevention */
> @@ -330,6 +331,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_power_flags[32];
> #define cpu_has_perfctr_l2 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_L2)
> #define cpu_has_cx8 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8)
> #define cpu_has_cx16 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX16)
> +#define cpu_has_mpx boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MPX)
> #define cpu_has_eager_fpu boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_EAGER_FPU)
> #define cpu_has_topoext boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TOPOEXT)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
> index 0415cda..d3e3ea5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xsave.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@
> #define XSTATE_FP 0x1
> #define XSTATE_SSE 0x2
> #define XSTATE_YMM 0x4
> +#define XSTATE_BNDREGS 0x8
> +#define XSTATE_BNDCSR 0x10
>
> #define XSTATE_FPSSE (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE)
>
> @@ -23,7 +25,8 @@
> /*
> * These are the features that the OS can handle currently.
> */
> -#define XCNTXT_MASK (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM)
> +#define XCNTXT_MASK (XSTATE_FP | XSTATE_SSE | XSTATE_YMM | \
> + XSTATE_BNDREGS | XSTATE_BNDCSR)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> #define REX_PREFIX "0x48, "
>
The patches look good. Please include a cover letter (patch 0/n) next
time, and detail the changes from previous submissions.
It would also be nice to have support of the new feature for nested VMX
as well (including kvm-unit-tests coverage).
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-02 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-02 16:43 [PATCH 1/4] X86: Intel MPX definiation Liu, Jinsong
2013-12-02 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Liu, Jinsong
2013-12-02 17:39 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-12-02 17:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-05 16:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-05 16:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-05 22:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-05 22:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-06 8:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-12-06 8:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-11-29 13:41 Liu, Jinsong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529CC5BB.7080702@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=haoxudong.hao@gmail.com \
--cc=jinsong.liu@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.