From: mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com (Mathias Nyman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: baytrail: lock IRQs when starting them
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:02:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529E008A.6030704@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386082822-20094-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
On 12/03/2013 05:00 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This uses the new API for tagging GPIO lines as in use by
> IRQs. This enforces a few semantic checks on how the underlying
> GPIO line is used.
>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Actually make the change compile, doh.
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> index 1174ea86b6e9..998dbb0c4c93 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> @@ -372,11 +372,33 @@ static void byt_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> }
>
> +static unsigned int byt_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct byt_gpio *vg = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d);
This should probably be:
struct byt_gpio *vg = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
As chip methods use irq_data->chip_data, not irq_data->handler_data
(Mika tested that it works on baytrail)
> +
> + if (gpio_lock_as_irq(&vg->chip, irqd_to_hwirq(d)))
> + dev_err(vg->chip.dev,
> + "unable to lock HW IRQ %lu for IRQ\n",
> + irqd_to_hwirq(d));
> + byt_irq_unmask(d);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void byt_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct byt_gpio *vg = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d);
Same here.
-Mathias
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: baytrail: lock IRQs when starting them
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 18:02:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <529E008A.6030704@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386082822-20094-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@linaro.org>
On 12/03/2013 05:00 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This uses the new API for tagging GPIO lines as in use by
> IRQs. This enforces a few semantic checks on how the underlying
> GPIO line is used.
>
> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> ---
> ChangeLog v1->v2:
> - Actually make the change compile, doh.
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> index 1174ea86b6e9..998dbb0c4c93 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-baytrail.c
> @@ -372,11 +372,33 @@ static void byt_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> }
>
> +static unsigned int byt_irq_startup(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct byt_gpio *vg = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d);
This should probably be:
struct byt_gpio *vg = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
As chip methods use irq_data->chip_data, not irq_data->handler_data
(Mika tested that it works on baytrail)
> +
> + if (gpio_lock_as_irq(&vg->chip, irqd_to_hwirq(d)))
> + dev_err(vg->chip.dev,
> + "unable to lock HW IRQ %lu for IRQ\n",
> + irqd_to_hwirq(d));
> + byt_irq_unmask(d);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void byt_irq_shutdown(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> + struct byt_gpio *vg = irq_data_get_irq_handler_data(d);
Same here.
-Mathias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-03 16:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-03 15:00 [PATCH v2] pinctrl: baytrail: lock IRQs when starting them Linus Walleij
2013-12-03 15:00 ` Linus Walleij
2013-12-03 16:02 ` Mathias Nyman [this message]
2013-12-03 16:02 ` Mathias Nyman
2013-12-04 10:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-12-04 10:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2013-12-04 13:26 ` Gerhard Sittig
2013-12-04 13:26 ` Gerhard Sittig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=529E008A.6030704@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.