All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] OF: base: match each node compatible against all given matches first
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:55:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <529E614B.3070307@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1312032210480.25191@math.ut.ee>

On 12/03/2013 09:14 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>> Currently, of_match_node compares each given match against all node's
>> compatible strings with of_device_is_compatible.
>>
>> To achieve multiple compatible strings per node with ordering from
>> specific to generic, this requires given matches to be ordered from
>> specific to generic. For most of the drivers this is not true and also
>> an alphabetical ordering is more sane there.
>>
>> Therefore, this patch modifies of_match_node to match each of the node's
>> compatible strings against all given matches first, before checking the
>> next compatible string. This implies that node's compatibles are ordered
>> from specific to generic while given matches can be in any order.
>
> I think I am on the CC: list because of a CPU detection problem report
> on sparc64 (183912d352a242a276a7877852f107459a13aff9 (of: move
> of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library) caused trouble and

The reason you are on Cc is that Thierry added you on last patch
version. I cannot see how above commit should be related with this
one, but maybe Thierry can comment on it.

> was reverted). So while your V2 patch does not cause any visible harm on
> the same Sun E3500, my gut feeling is that an additional patch would be
> needed to actually test it (a patch like
> 183912d352a242a276a7877852f107459a13aff9).

This patch deals with matching a node with more than one compatible
string on a (unordered) list of matches. Although not related to your
issue, it is good to hear that it causes no harm on DT-mature archs :)

I tested it with ARM and l2x0 cache controllers, where the specific
of_device_id (marvell,tauros3-cache) is sorted after the generic
one (arm,pl310-cache). The corresponding node's property is
compatible = "marvell,tauros3-cache", "arm,pl310-cache".

Without this patch, of_match_node always hits the first match that
equals _any_ of the above compatible strings. With this patch, it
hits the matches _in order_ of the compatible strings.

> Is this correct or am I missing something?

Thierry?

>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v1->v2:
>> - Allow checks against nodes with no compatible (Reported by Rob Herring)
>> - Add some comments
>>
>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
>> Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
>> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>> Cc: devicetree at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>   drivers/of/base.c |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> index f807d0e..8d007d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -731,24 +731,42 @@ static
>>   const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>   					   const struct device_node *node)
>>   {
>> +	const char *cp;
>> +	int cplen, l;
>> +
>>   	if (!matches)
>>   		return NULL;
>>
>> -	while (matches->name[0] || matches->type[0] || matches->compatible[0]) {
>> -		int match = 1;
>> -		if (matches->name[0])
>> -			match &= node->name
>> -				&& !strcmp(matches->name, node->name);
>> -		if (matches->type[0])
>> -			match &= node->type
>> -				&& !strcmp(matches->type, node->type);
>> -		if (matches->compatible[0])
>> -			match &= __of_device_is_compatible(node,
>> -							   matches->compatible);
>> -		if (match)
>> -			return matches;
>> -		matches++;
>> -	}
>> +	cp = __of_get_property(node, "compatible", &cplen);
>> +	do {
>> +		const struct of_device_id *m = matches;
>> +
>> +		/* Check against matches with current compatible string */
>> +		while (m->name[0] || m->type[0] || m->compatible[0]) {
>> +			int match = 1;
>> +			if (m->name[0])
>> +				match &= node->name
>> +					&& !strcmp(m->name, node->name);
>> +			if (m->type[0])
>> +				match &= node->type
>> +					&& !strcmp(m->type, node->type);
>> +			if (m->compatible[0])
>> +				match &= cp
>> +					&& !of_compat_cmp(m->compatible, cp,
>> +							strlen(m->compatible));
>> +			if (match)
>> +				return m;
>> +			m++;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* Get node's next compatible string */
>> +		if (cp) {
>> +			l = strlen(cp) + 1;
>> +			cp += l;
>> +			cplen -= l;
>> +		}
>> +	} while (cp && (cplen > 0));
>> +
>>   	return NULL;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -757,7 +775,10 @@ const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>    *	@matches:	array of of device match structures to search in
>>    *	@node:		the of device structure to match against
>>    *
>> - *	Low level utility function used by device matching.
>> + *	Low level utility function used by device matching. Matching order
>> + *	is to compare each of the node's compatibles with all given matches
>> + *	first. This implies node's compatible is sorted from specific to
>> + *	generic while matches can be in any order.
>>    */
>>   const struct of_device_id *of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>   					 const struct device_node *node)
>>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Grant Likely
	<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt
	<benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Thierry Reding
	<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	Linux Kernel list
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	David Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] OF: base: match each node compatible against all given matches first
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:55:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <529E614B.3070307@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1312032210480.25191-ptEonEWSGqKptlylMvRsHA@public.gmane.org>

On 12/03/2013 09:14 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>> Currently, of_match_node compares each given match against all node's
>> compatible strings with of_device_is_compatible.
>>
>> To achieve multiple compatible strings per node with ordering from
>> specific to generic, this requires given matches to be ordered from
>> specific to generic. For most of the drivers this is not true and also
>> an alphabetical ordering is more sane there.
>>
>> Therefore, this patch modifies of_match_node to match each of the node's
>> compatible strings against all given matches first, before checking the
>> next compatible string. This implies that node's compatibles are ordered
>> from specific to generic while given matches can be in any order.
>
> I think I am on the CC: list because of a CPU detection problem report
> on sparc64 (183912d352a242a276a7877852f107459a13aff9 (of: move
> of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library) caused trouble and

The reason you are on Cc is that Thierry added you on last patch
version. I cannot see how above commit should be related with this
one, but maybe Thierry can comment on it.

> was reverted). So while your V2 patch does not cause any visible harm on
> the same Sun E3500, my gut feeling is that an additional patch would be
> needed to actually test it (a patch like
> 183912d352a242a276a7877852f107459a13aff9).

This patch deals with matching a node with more than one compatible
string on a (unordered) list of matches. Although not related to your
issue, it is good to hear that it causes no harm on DT-mature archs :)

I tested it with ARM and l2x0 cache controllers, where the specific
of_device_id (marvell,tauros3-cache) is sorted after the generic
one (arm,pl310-cache). The corresponding node's property is
compatible = "marvell,tauros3-cache", "arm,pl310-cache".

Without this patch, of_match_node always hits the first match that
equals _any_ of the above compatible strings. With this patch, it
hits the matches _in order_ of the compatible strings.

> Is this correct or am I missing something?

Thierry?

>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v1->v2:
>> - Allow checks against nodes with no compatible (Reported by Rob Herring)
>> - Add some comments
>>
>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos-Y27EyoLml9s@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
>> Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
>> ---
>>   drivers/of/base.c |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> index f807d0e..8d007d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -731,24 +731,42 @@ static
>>   const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>   					   const struct device_node *node)
>>   {
>> +	const char *cp;
>> +	int cplen, l;
>> +
>>   	if (!matches)
>>   		return NULL;
>>
>> -	while (matches->name[0] || matches->type[0] || matches->compatible[0]) {
>> -		int match = 1;
>> -		if (matches->name[0])
>> -			match &= node->name
>> -				&& !strcmp(matches->name, node->name);
>> -		if (matches->type[0])
>> -			match &= node->type
>> -				&& !strcmp(matches->type, node->type);
>> -		if (matches->compatible[0])
>> -			match &= __of_device_is_compatible(node,
>> -							   matches->compatible);
>> -		if (match)
>> -			return matches;
>> -		matches++;
>> -	}
>> +	cp = __of_get_property(node, "compatible", &cplen);
>> +	do {
>> +		const struct of_device_id *m = matches;
>> +
>> +		/* Check against matches with current compatible string */
>> +		while (m->name[0] || m->type[0] || m->compatible[0]) {
>> +			int match = 1;
>> +			if (m->name[0])
>> +				match &= node->name
>> +					&& !strcmp(m->name, node->name);
>> +			if (m->type[0])
>> +				match &= node->type
>> +					&& !strcmp(m->type, node->type);
>> +			if (m->compatible[0])
>> +				match &= cp
>> +					&& !of_compat_cmp(m->compatible, cp,
>> +							strlen(m->compatible));
>> +			if (match)
>> +				return m;
>> +			m++;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* Get node's next compatible string */
>> +		if (cp) {
>> +			l = strlen(cp) + 1;
>> +			cp += l;
>> +			cplen -= l;
>> +		}
>> +	} while (cp && (cplen > 0));
>> +
>>   	return NULL;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -757,7 +775,10 @@ const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>    *	@matches:	array of of device match structures to search in
>>    *	@node:		the of device structure to match against
>>    *
>> - *	Low level utility function used by device matching.
>> + *	Low level utility function used by device matching. Matching order
>> + *	is to compare each of the node's compatibles with all given matches
>> + *	first. This implies node's compatible is sorted from specific to
>> + *	generic while matches can be in any order.
>>    */
>>   const struct of_device_id *of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>   					 const struct device_node *node)
>>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] OF: base: match each node compatible against all given matches first
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 23:55:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <529E614B.3070307@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1312032210480.25191@math.ut.ee>

On 12/03/2013 09:14 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>> Currently, of_match_node compares each given match against all node's
>> compatible strings with of_device_is_compatible.
>>
>> To achieve multiple compatible strings per node with ordering from
>> specific to generic, this requires given matches to be ordered from
>> specific to generic. For most of the drivers this is not true and also
>> an alphabetical ordering is more sane there.
>>
>> Therefore, this patch modifies of_match_node to match each of the node's
>> compatible strings against all given matches first, before checking the
>> next compatible string. This implies that node's compatibles are ordered
>> from specific to generic while given matches can be in any order.
>
> I think I am on the CC: list because of a CPU detection problem report
> on sparc64 (183912d352a242a276a7877852f107459a13aff9 (of: move
> of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library) caused trouble and

The reason you are on Cc is that Thierry added you on last patch
version. I cannot see how above commit should be related with this
one, but maybe Thierry can comment on it.

> was reverted). So while your V2 patch does not cause any visible harm on
> the same Sun E3500, my gut feeling is that an additional patch would be
> needed to actually test it (a patch like
> 183912d352a242a276a7877852f107459a13aff9).

This patch deals with matching a node with more than one compatible
string on a (unordered) list of matches. Although not related to your
issue, it is good to hear that it causes no harm on DT-mature archs :)

I tested it with ARM and l2x0 cache controllers, where the specific
of_device_id (marvell,tauros3-cache) is sorted after the generic
one (arm,pl310-cache). The corresponding node's property is
compatible = "marvell,tauros3-cache", "arm,pl310-cache".

Without this patch, of_match_node always hits the first match that
equals _any_ of the above compatible strings. With this patch, it
hits the matches _in order_ of the compatible strings.

> Is this correct or am I missing something?

Thierry?

>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Changelog:
>> v1->v2:
>> - Allow checks against nodes with no compatible (Reported by Rob Herring)
>> - Add some comments
>>
>> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
>> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>> Cc: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
>> Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
>> Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
>> Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> ---
>>   drivers/of/base.c |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>>   1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
>> index f807d0e..8d007d8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/of/base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/of/base.c
>> @@ -731,24 +731,42 @@ static
>>   const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>   					   const struct device_node *node)
>>   {
>> +	const char *cp;
>> +	int cplen, l;
>> +
>>   	if (!matches)
>>   		return NULL;
>>
>> -	while (matches->name[0] || matches->type[0] || matches->compatible[0]) {
>> -		int match = 1;
>> -		if (matches->name[0])
>> -			match &= node->name
>> -				&& !strcmp(matches->name, node->name);
>> -		if (matches->type[0])
>> -			match &= node->type
>> -				&& !strcmp(matches->type, node->type);
>> -		if (matches->compatible[0])
>> -			match &= __of_device_is_compatible(node,
>> -							   matches->compatible);
>> -		if (match)
>> -			return matches;
>> -		matches++;
>> -	}
>> +	cp = __of_get_property(node, "compatible", &cplen);
>> +	do {
>> +		const struct of_device_id *m = matches;
>> +
>> +		/* Check against matches with current compatible string */
>> +		while (m->name[0] || m->type[0] || m->compatible[0]) {
>> +			int match = 1;
>> +			if (m->name[0])
>> +				match &= node->name
>> +					&& !strcmp(m->name, node->name);
>> +			if (m->type[0])
>> +				match &= node->type
>> +					&& !strcmp(m->type, node->type);
>> +			if (m->compatible[0])
>> +				match &= cp
>> +					&& !of_compat_cmp(m->compatible, cp,
>> +							strlen(m->compatible));
>> +			if (match)
>> +				return m;
>> +			m++;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		/* Get node's next compatible string */
>> +		if (cp) {
>> +			l = strlen(cp) + 1;
>> +			cp += l;
>> +			cplen -= l;
>> +		}
>> +	} while (cp && (cplen > 0));
>> +
>>   	return NULL;
>>   }
>>
>> @@ -757,7 +775,10 @@ const struct of_device_id *__of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>    *	@matches:	array of of device match structures to search in
>>    *	@node:		the of device structure to match against
>>    *
>> - *	Low level utility function used by device matching.
>> + *	Low level utility function used by device matching. Matching order
>> + *	is to compare each of the node's compatibles with all given matches
>> + *	first. This implies node's compatible is sorted from specific to
>> + *	generic while matches can be in any order.
>>    */
>>   const struct of_device_id *of_match_node(const struct of_device_id *matches,
>>   					 const struct device_node *node)
>>
>


  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-03 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-28 18:36 [PATCH] OF: base: match each node compatible against all given matches first Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-11-28 18:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-11-28 18:36 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-02 12:03 ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-02 12:03   ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-02 12:03   ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-02 14:00   ` Rob Herring
2013-12-02 14:00     ` Rob Herring
2013-12-02 14:00     ` Rob Herring
2013-12-02 14:09     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-02 14:09       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-02 14:09       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-03 13:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-03 13:52   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-03 13:52   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-03 20:14   ` Meelis Roos
2013-12-03 20:14     ` Meelis Roos
2013-12-03 20:14     ` Meelis Roos
2013-12-03 22:55     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2013-12-03 22:55       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-03 22:55       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-04  9:40       ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-04  9:40         ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-04  9:40         ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-04 13:08         ` Meelis Roos
2013-12-04 13:08           ` Meelis Roos
2013-12-04 13:08           ` Meelis Roos
2013-12-04 14:04           ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-04 14:04             ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-04 14:04             ` Thierry Reding
2013-12-04 19:23   ` Rob Herring
2013-12-04 19:23     ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=529E614B.3070307@gmail.com \
    --to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.