From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE load with randomization disabled
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 13:53:55 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A63BF3.1000608@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOqEO271PUUkPAQu5hnZFyTX2viUXg8R0hpwDky0B-seyg@mail.gmail.com>
On 12/09/2013 01:52 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> Why is that? It would seem to be a big difference between a relocatable
>> binary (PIE) and one with a load address fixed at link time.
>>
>
> PIE with non-zero vaddr should be loaded at non-zero
> vaddr. Otherwise, PIE may not work as expected.
>
Please explain why that is the case, as it seems to be implying that PIE
isn't actually relocatable in that case...
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-09 15:50 [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE load with randomization disabled H.J. Lu
2013-12-09 20:57 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-09 21:03 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-09 21:13 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-09 21:47 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-09 21:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-09 21:52 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-09 21:53 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-12-09 21:59 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-09 22:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-09 22:03 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-11 13:36 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-11 13:41 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-11 17:49 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-11 18:21 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-11 19:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-11 20:02 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-09 21:51 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-12-09 21:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-09 21:44 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-09 23:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-09 23:53 ` H.J. Lu
2013-12-10 0:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-10 0:41 ` H.J. Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A63BF3.1000608@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.