From: "Jan Včelák" <jan.vcelak@nic.cz>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: lenb@kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: full battery charge cannot exceed current one
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:25:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A6434B.9040100@nic.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131209170214.GB30717@srcf.ucam.org>
>> Some degraded batteries report maximal capacity to be smaller than
>> current charge of the battery. This can confuse some user space
>> applications (like upower).
>
> Can't we just fix upower?
It looks like upower already resolved that:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/upower/tree/src/linux/up-device-supply.c#n652
If the purpose of sysfs is to provide raw values retrieved from battery,
then I agree that this should not be handled in kernel.
Otherwise I would expect semantically correct data there.
>> + /* Some degraded batteries report lower full charge than current one. */
>> + if (battery->capacity_now > battery->full_charge_capacity)
>> + battery->full_charge_capacity = battery->capacity_now;
>> +
>
> Does upower read *_full on every read of the value? How do we guarantee
> that it won't read energy_now without updating energy_full and still
> come up with an incorrect calculation?
That's a good point. I'm not sure about other applications, but upower
always refreshes all values. Function up_device_supply_refresh_battery
seems to be the only place where 'charge_now' is being read:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/upower/tree/src/linux/up-device-supply.c#n485
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-09 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-07 12:36 [PATCH] ACPI: full battery charge cannot exceed current one Jan Vcelak
2013-12-09 17:02 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-12-09 22:25 ` Jan Včelák [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52A6434B.9040100@nic.cz \
--to=jan.vcelak@nic.cz \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.