All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] regmap: Add support for using regmap over ssbi
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:32:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A7C0C3.2070805@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131211005106.GL11468@sirena.org.uk>

On 12/10/13 16:51, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:13:15PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> increment reg by 1 every time through this loop. Or should we just have
>> use_single_rw == true?
> No, it doesn't - it increments the address of reg by the size of a
> register value each time.  Using use_single_rw might make sense, or if
> you can't do bulk I/O at all then hooking in via reg_read() and
> reg_write() in the config rather than trying to parse out the buffers
> might be even better (you can still make helpers to set that up).


Are you suggesting we implement the reg_read/reg_write as global helpers
that the config points to and then call regmap_init()? At a quick glance
it looks like we lose out on regmap_bulk_read() if we do that. There is
one driver that will use regmap_bulk_read(), but I suppose we can just
loop on regmap_read() and do our own increment? If we use use_single_rw
everything works and we can simplify this code to just pass the reg and
val buffers directly to ssbi_read/write.

This is what I have now.

static int regmap_ssbi_read(void *context,
                            const void *regp, size_t reg_size,
                            void *val, size_t val_size)
{
        int ret;
        u16 reg;

        BUG_ON(reg_size != 2);

        reg = *(u16 *)regp;
        while (val_size) {
                ret = ssbi_read(context, reg, val, 1);
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
                reg++;
                val += sizeof(u8);
                val_size -= sizeof(u8);
        }

        return 0;
}

With use_single_rw I think it can be this.

static int regmap_ssbi_read(void *context,
                            const void *reg, size_t reg_size,
                            void *val, size_t val_size)
{
        BUG_ON(reg_size != 2);  
        return ssbi_read(context, *(u16 *)reg, val, 1);
}

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/8] regmap: Add support for using regmap over ssbi
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:32:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52A7C0C3.2070805@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131211005106.GL11468@sirena.org.uk>

On 12/10/13 16:51, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 04:13:15PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> increment reg by 1 every time through this loop. Or should we just have
>> use_single_rw == true?
> No, it doesn't - it increments the address of reg by the size of a
> register value each time.  Using use_single_rw might make sense, or if
> you can't do bulk I/O at all then hooking in via reg_read() and
> reg_write() in the config rather than trying to parse out the buffers
> might be even better (you can still make helpers to set that up).


Are you suggesting we implement the reg_read/reg_write as global helpers
that the config points to and then call regmap_init()? At a quick glance
it looks like we lose out on regmap_bulk_read() if we do that. There is
one driver that will use regmap_bulk_read(), but I suppose we can just
loop on regmap_read() and do our own increment? If we use use_single_rw
everything works and we can simplify this code to just pass the reg and
val buffers directly to ssbi_read/write.

This is what I have now.

static int regmap_ssbi_read(void *context,
                            const void *regp, size_t reg_size,
                            void *val, size_t val_size)
{
        int ret;
        u16 reg;

        BUG_ON(reg_size != 2);

        reg = *(u16 *)regp;
        while (val_size) {
                ret = ssbi_read(context, reg, val, 1);
                if (ret)
                        return ret;
                reg++;
                val += sizeof(u8);
                val_size -= sizeof(u8);
        }

        return 0;
}

With use_single_rw I think it can be this.

static int regmap_ssbi_read(void *context,
                            const void *reg, size_t reg_size,
                            void *val, size_t val_size)
{
        BUG_ON(reg_size != 2);  
        return ssbi_read(context, *(u16 *)reg, val, 1);
}

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-11  1:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-10 23:35 [PATCH 0/8] Modernize pm8921 with irqdomains + regmap Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35 ` [PATCH 1/8] mfd: ssbi: Remove platform data structs and hide ssbi type enum Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11  9:27   ` Lee Jones
2013-12-11  9:27     ` Lee Jones
2013-12-10 23:35 ` [PATCH 2/8] mfd: ssbi: Constify buffer in ssbi_write Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11  9:28   ` Lee Jones
2013-12-11  9:28     ` Lee Jones
2013-12-10 23:35 ` [PATCH 3/8] regmap: Add support for using regmap over ssbi Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:50   ` Mark Brown
2013-12-10 23:50     ` Mark Brown
2013-12-11  0:13     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11  0:13       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11  0:51       ` Mark Brown
2013-12-11  0:51         ` Mark Brown
2013-12-11  1:32         ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-12-11  1:32           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11 13:27           ` Mark Brown
2013-12-11 13:27             ` Mark Brown
2013-12-12 23:13             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-12 23:13               ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-13 10:41               ` Mark Brown
2013-12-13 10:41                 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-13 17:14                 ` [PATCH] regmap: Allow regmap_bulk_read() to work for "no-bus" regmaps Stephen Boyd
2013-12-13 17:14                   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-13 17:14                   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-16 20:57                   ` Mark Brown
2013-12-16 20:57                     ` Mark Brown
2013-12-13 21:37                 ` [PATCH 3/8] regmap: Add support for using regmap over ssbi Stephen Boyd
2013-12-13 21:37                   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-16 21:01                   ` Mark Brown
2013-12-16 21:01                     ` Mark Brown
2013-12-17  2:30                     ` [PATCH] regmap: Allow regmap_bulk_write() to work for "no-bus" regmaps Stephen Boyd
2013-12-17  2:30                       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-18 18:45                       ` Mark Brown
2013-12-18 18:45                         ` Mark Brown
2013-12-23 20:05                         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-23 20:05                           ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-24 12:53                           ` Mark Brown
2013-12-24 12:53                             ` Mark Brown
2013-12-26 19:34                             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-26 19:34                               ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-26 21:52                               ` [PATCH v2] " Stephen Boyd
2013-12-26 21:52                                 ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-30 12:42                                 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-30 12:42                                   ` Mark Brown
2013-12-10 23:35 ` [PATCH 4/8] mfd: ssbi: Mark match table const Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11  9:29   ` Lee Jones
2013-12-11  9:29     ` Lee Jones
2013-12-10 23:35 ` [PATCH 5/8] mfd: Move pm8xxx-irq.c contents into only driver that uses it Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11  9:35   ` Lee Jones
2013-12-11  9:35     ` Lee Jones
2013-12-12 19:06     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-12 19:06       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35 ` [PATCH 6/8] mfd: pm8921: Update for genirq changes Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11  9:48   ` Lee Jones
2013-12-11  9:48     ` Lee Jones
2013-12-10 23:35 ` [PATCH 7/8] mfd: pm8921: Migrate to irqdomains Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11  9:53   ` Lee Jones
2013-12-11  9:53     ` Lee Jones
2013-12-11 21:30   ` Courtney Cavin
2013-12-11 21:30     ` Courtney Cavin
2013-12-12 19:05     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-12 19:05       ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35 ` [PATCH 8/8] mfd: pm8921: Use ssbi regmap Stephen Boyd
2013-12-10 23:35   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-12-11  9:55   ` Lee Jones
2013-12-11  9:55     ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52A7C0C3.2070805@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.