* Kernel 3.0.35 (fsl vs imx)
@ 2013-12-12 15:22 Marco
2013-12-12 15:28 ` Gary Thomas
2013-12-12 18:08 ` Gary Thomas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco @ 2013-12-12 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org
Hello,
if I use only the layer meta-fsl-arm I get by default the kernel
linux-fsl-3.0.35-r32-14
if I add the layers meta-fsl-arm-extra and meta-fsl-demo I get the
kernel linux-imx-3.0.35-r37-14
What is the suggested version to use?
TIA
--
Marco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel 3.0.35 (fsl vs imx)
2013-12-12 15:22 Kernel 3.0.35 (fsl vs imx) Marco
@ 2013-12-12 15:28 ` Gary Thomas
2013-12-12 17:40 ` Marco
2013-12-12 18:08 ` Gary Thomas
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2013-12-12 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meta-freescale
On 2013-12-12 08:22, Marco wrote:
> Hello,
> if I use only the layer meta-fsl-arm I get by default the kernel linux-fsl-3.0.35-r32-14
> if I add the layers meta-fsl-arm-extra and meta-fsl-demo I get the kernel linux-imx-3.0.35-r37-14
>
> What is the suggested version to use?
What target [board] are you using?
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel 3.0.35 (fsl vs imx)
2013-12-12 15:28 ` Gary Thomas
@ 2013-12-12 17:40 ` Marco
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco @ 2013-12-12 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meta-freescale
Il 12/12/2013 16:28, Gary Thomas ha scritto:
> On 2013-12-12 08:22, Marco wrote:
>> Hello,
>> if I use only the layer meta-fsl-arm I get by default the kernel
>> linux-fsl-3.0.35-r32-14
>> if I add the layers meta-fsl-arm-extra and meta-fsl-demo I get the
>> kernel linux-imx-3.0.35-r37-14
>>
>> What is the suggested version to use?
>
> What target [board] are you using?
>
Hi Gary,
it's a imx6dlsabresd
--
Marco
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel 3.0.35 (fsl vs imx)
2013-12-12 15:22 Kernel 3.0.35 (fsl vs imx) Marco
2013-12-12 15:28 ` Gary Thomas
@ 2013-12-12 18:08 ` Gary Thomas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Gary Thomas @ 2013-12-12 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: meta-freescale
On 2013-12-12 08:22, Marco wrote:
> Hello,
> if I use only the layer meta-fsl-arm I get by default the kernel linux-fsl-3.0.35-r32-14
> if I add the layers meta-fsl-arm-extra and meta-fsl-demo I get the kernel linux-imx-3.0.35-r37-14
>
> What is the suggested version to use?
These are probably the same kernel - that recipe uses INCPR which
causes the revision (-rXX) to be incremented every time the recipe
is [re]built. In your case, adding the additional layers probably
triggered the rebuild.
Note that there is only one linux-imx_3.0.35 recipe in all of
the meta-fsl* layers.
--
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas | Consulting for the
MLB Associates | Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-12 18:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-12-12 15:22 Kernel 3.0.35 (fsl vs imx) Marco
2013-12-12 15:28 ` Gary Thomas
2013-12-12 17:40 ` Marco
2013-12-12 18:08 ` Gary Thomas
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.