From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH CRITICAL] ARM: s3c64xx: dt: Fix boot failure due to double clock initialization
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:47:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AC4568.7030201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201312140400.16794.arnd@arndb.de>
On 12/14/2013 04:00 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 13 December 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Commit
>>
>> 4178bac ARM: call of_clk_init from default time_init handler
>>
>> added implicit call to of_clk_init() from default time_init callback,
>> but it did not change platforms calling it from other callbacks, despite
>> of not having custom time_init callbacks. This caused double clock
>> initialization on such platforms, leading to boot failures. An example
>> of such platform is mach-s3c64xx.
>>
>> This patch fixes boot failure on s3c64xx by dropping custom init_irq
>> callback, which had a call to of_clk_init() and moving system reset
>> initialization to init_machine callback. This allows us to have
>> clocks initialized properly without a need to have custom init_time or
>> init_irq callbacks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Thomas,
thanks for catching this and sorry for the inconvenience. Either I
simply missed s3c64xx or it went in with that global of_clk_init
patch.
> I see of_clk_init(NULL) getting called on two other ARM platforms:
>
> $ git grep -w of_clk_init arch/arm
> arch/arm/kernel/time.c: of_clk_init(NULL);
> arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c: of_clk_init(NULL);
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c: of_clk_init(NULL);
> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-s3c64xx-dt.c: of_clk_init(NULL);
>
> Are the other two platforms ok here?
mvebu is fine as long as it has its own .init_time callback (which it
has).
> I assume that mvebu is fine since Sebastian would have noticed breaking
> that one and it has a custom init_time function, but keystone seems
> broken in the same way as s3c64xx. Santosh, can you have a look?
I also had a look at keystone and guess it is broken, too.
of_clk_init(NULL) is called in keystone_pm_runtime_init() which is
set as subsys_initcall. Simply removing the extra of_clk_init call
in keystone_pm_runtime_init should be enough here:
From 4ef4720c0d7ca9be57b06dc7ab1483c77a5ada1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:21:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: keystone: remove call to of_clk_init
Commit
4178bac ARM: call of_clk_init from default time_init handler
added implicit call to of_clk_init(NULL) from default time_init callback.
This causes double clock initialization on keystone, leading to boot
failures.
This patch fixes boot failure on keystone by dropping the call to
of_clk_init(NULL) in keystone_pm_runtime_init(), which is set as
subsys_initcall and therefore called after arch-wide .init_time callback.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
index 2962523..3f17e16 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/pm_clock.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
@@ -74,7 +73,6 @@ int __init keystone_pm_runtime_init(void)
if (!np)
return 0;
- of_clk_init(NULL);
pm_clk_add_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &platform_domain_notifier);
return 0;
--
1.8.4.rc3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com (Sebastian Hesselbarth)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH CRITICAL] ARM: s3c64xx: dt: Fix boot failure due to double clock initialization
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:47:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AC4568.7030201@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201312140400.16794.arnd@arndb.de>
On 12/14/2013 04:00 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 13 December 2013, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Commit
>>
>> 4178bac ARM: call of_clk_init from default time_init handler
>>
>> added implicit call to of_clk_init() from default time_init callback,
>> but it did not change platforms calling it from other callbacks, despite
>> of not having custom time_init callbacks. This caused double clock
>> initialization on such platforms, leading to boot failures. An example
>> of such platform is mach-s3c64xx.
>>
>> This patch fixes boot failure on s3c64xx by dropping custom init_irq
>> callback, which had a call to of_clk_init() and moving system reset
>> initialization to init_machine callback. This allows us to have
>> clocks initialized properly without a need to have custom init_time or
>> init_irq callbacks.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
Thomas,
thanks for catching this and sorry for the inconvenience. Either I
simply missed s3c64xx or it went in with that global of_clk_init
patch.
> I see of_clk_init(NULL) getting called on two other ARM platforms:
>
> $ git grep -w of_clk_init arch/arm
> arch/arm/kernel/time.c: of_clk_init(NULL);
> arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c: of_clk_init(NULL);
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c: of_clk_init(NULL);
> arch/arm/mach-s3c64xx/mach-s3c64xx-dt.c: of_clk_init(NULL);
>
> Are the other two platforms ok here?
mvebu is fine as long as it has its own .init_time callback (which it
has).
> I assume that mvebu is fine since Sebastian would have noticed breaking
> that one and it has a custom init_time function, but keystone seems
> broken in the same way as s3c64xx. Santosh, can you have a look?
I also had a look at keystone and guess it is broken, too.
of_clk_init(NULL) is called in keystone_pm_runtime_init() which is
set as subsys_initcall. Simply removing the extra of_clk_init call
in keystone_pm_runtime_init should be enough here:
From 4ef4720c0d7ca9be57b06dc7ab1483c77a5ada1d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 12:21:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: keystone: remove call to of_clk_init
Commit
4178bac ARM: call of_clk_init from default time_init handler
added implicit call to of_clk_init(NULL) from default time_init callback.
This causes double clock initialization on keystone, leading to boot
failures.
This patch fixes boot failure on keystone by dropping the call to
of_clk_init(NULL) in keystone_pm_runtime_init(), which is set as
subsys_initcall and therefore called after arch-wide .init_time callback.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
index 2962523..3f17e16 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-keystone/pm_domain.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
#include <linux/pm_clock.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
@@ -74,7 +73,6 @@ int __init keystone_pm_runtime_init(void)
if (!np)
return 0;
- of_clk_init(NULL);
pm_clk_add_notifier(&platform_bus_type, &platform_domain_notifier);
return 0;
--
1.8.4.rc3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-14 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-13 19:59 [PATCH CRITICAL] ARM: s3c64xx: dt: Fix boot failure due to double clock initialization Tomasz Figa
2013-12-13 19:59 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-12-14 3:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-14 3:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-14 5:50 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-14 5:50 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-14 17:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14 17:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14 11:47 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth [this message]
2013-12-14 11:47 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-12-14 17:30 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14 17:30 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-12-14 5:52 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-14 5:52 ` Olof Johansson
[not found] ` <CAPTRvHn7yTt6mC1fjEn5Ra9yx=GZ1DyNQtGWvHsDd_LkuiM_wA@mail.gmail.com>
2013-12-14 12:41 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-12-14 12:41 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-12-14 14:14 ` Dillon
2013-12-14 14:14 ` Dillon
2013-12-16 21:09 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-16 21:09 ` Mark Brown
2013-12-17 15:14 ` Charles Keepax
2013-12-17 15:14 ` Charles Keepax
2013-12-17 19:12 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-17 19:12 ` Olof Johansson
2014-06-10 8:17 ` Olof Johansson
2014-06-10 8:17 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52AC4568.7030201@gmail.com \
--to=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.