All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm-vgic: Support unqueueing of LRs to the dist
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:53:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AEF7D1.5050309@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386878149-13397-9-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

On 12/12/13 19:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> To properly access the VGIC state from user space it is very unpractical
> to have to loop through all the LRs in all register access functions.
> Instead, support moving all pending state from LRs to the distributor,
> but leave active state LRs alone.
> 
> Note that to accurately present the active and pending state to VCPUs
> reading these distributor registers from a live VM, we would have to
> stop all other VPUs than the calling VCPU and ask each CPU to unqueue
> their LR state onto the distributor and add fields to track active state
> on the distributor side as well.  We don't have any users of such
> functionality yet and there are other inaccuracies of the GIC emulation,
> so don't provide accurate synchronized access to this state just yet.
> However, when the time comes, having this function should help.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
> Changelog[v4]:
>  - Reworked vgic_unqueue_irqs to explicitly check for the active bit and
>    to not use __test_and_clear_bit.
> 
> Changelog[v3]:
>  - New patch in series
> 
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 88599b5..8067e76 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -589,6 +589,78 @@ static bool handle_mmio_sgi_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +#define LR_CPUID(lr)	\
> +	(((lr) & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID) >> GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
> +#define LR_IRQID(lr)	\
> +	((lr) & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID)
> +
> +static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, int irq, struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu)
> +{
> +	clear_bit(lr_nr, vgic_cpu->lr_used);
> +	vgic_cpu->vgic_lr[lr_nr] &= ~GICH_LR_STATE;
> +	vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq] = LR_EMPTY;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vgic_unqueue_irqs - move pending IRQs from LRs to the distributor
> + * @vgic_cpu: Pointer to the vgic_cpu struct holding the LRs
> + *
> + * Move any pending IRQs that have already been assigned to LRs back to the
> + * emulated distributor state so that the complete emulated state can be read
> + * from the main emulation structures without investigating the LRs.
> + *
> + * Note that IRQs in the active state in the LRs get their pending state moved
> + * to the distributor but the active state stays in the LRs, because we don't
> + * track the active state on the distributor side.
> + */
> +static void vgic_unqueue_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
> +	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> +	int vcpu_id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
> +	int i, irq, source_cpu;
> +	u32 *lr;
> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(i, vgic_cpu->lr_used, vgic_cpu->nr_lr) {
> +		lr = &vgic_cpu->vgic_lr[i];
> +		irq = LR_IRQID(*lr);
> +		source_cpu = LR_CPUID(*lr);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * There are three options for the state bits:
> +		 *
> +		 * 01: pending
> +		 * 10: active
> +		 * 11: pending and active
> +		 *
> +		 * If the LR holds only an active interrupt (not pending) then
> +		 * just leave it alone.
> +		 */
> +		if ((*lr & GICH_LR_STATE) == GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the interrupt was only pending (not "active" or "pending
> +		 * and active") then we the pending state will get moved to
                                     ^^ extra 'we'
> +		 * the distributor and the LR does not hold any info and can
> +		 * be marked as free for other use.
> +		 */
> +		if ((*lr & GICH_LR_STATE) == GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT)
> +			vgic_retire_lr(i, irq, vgic_cpu);

We should handle the ACTIVE+PENDING case, and I don't think we do.
Should it be (*lr & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT)? I think the previous version
handled this case correctly.

> +		/*
> +		 * Finally, reestablish the pending state on the distributor
> +		 * and the CPU interface.  It may have already been pending,
> +		 * but that is fine, then we are only setting a few bits that
> +		 * were already set.
> +		 */
> +		vgic_dist_irq_set(vcpu, irq);
> +		if (irq < VGIC_NR_SGIS)
> +			dist->irq_sgi_sources[vcpu_id][irq] |= 1 << source_cpu;
> +		vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static bool handle_mmio_sgi_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  				  struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio,
>  				  phys_addr_t offset)
> @@ -848,8 +920,6 @@ static void vgic_update_state(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -#define LR_CPUID(lr)	\
> -	(((lr) & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID) >> GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
>  #define MK_LR_PEND(src, irq)	\
>  	(GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT | ((src) << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT) | (irq))
>  
> @@ -871,9 +941,7 @@ static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		int irq = vgic_cpu->vgic_lr[lr] & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
>  
>  		if (!vgic_irq_is_enabled(vcpu, irq)) {
> -			vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq] = LR_EMPTY;
> -			clear_bit(lr, vgic_cpu->lr_used);
> -			vgic_cpu->vgic_lr[lr] &= ~GICH_LR_STATE;
> +			vgic_retire_lr(lr, irq, vgic_cpu);
>  			if (vgic_irq_is_active(vcpu, irq))
>  				vgic_irq_clear_active(vcpu, irq);
>  		}
> @@ -1675,6 +1743,14 @@ static int vgic_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Move all pending IRQs from the LRs on all VCPUs so the pending
> +	 * state can be properly represented in the register state accessible
> +	 * through this API.
> +	 */
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, tmp_vcpu, dev->kvm)
> +		vgic_unqueue_irqs(tmp_vcpu);
> +
>  	offset -= r->base;
>  	r->handle_mmio(vcpu, &mmio, offset);
>  
> 


-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Cc: "kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	"patches@linaro.org" <patches@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm-vgic: Support unqueueing of LRs to the dist
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 12:53:37 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AEF7D1.5050309@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386878149-13397-9-git-send-email-christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

On 12/12/13 19:55, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> To properly access the VGIC state from user space it is very unpractical
> to have to loop through all the LRs in all register access functions.
> Instead, support moving all pending state from LRs to the distributor,
> but leave active state LRs alone.
> 
> Note that to accurately present the active and pending state to VCPUs
> reading these distributor registers from a live VM, we would have to
> stop all other VPUs than the calling VCPU and ask each CPU to unqueue
> their LR state onto the distributor and add fields to track active state
> on the distributor side as well.  We don't have any users of such
> functionality yet and there are other inaccuracies of the GIC emulation,
> so don't provide accurate synchronized access to this state just yet.
> However, when the time comes, having this function should help.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
> ---
> Changelog[v4]:
>  - Reworked vgic_unqueue_irqs to explicitly check for the active bit and
>    to not use __test_and_clear_bit.
> 
> Changelog[v3]:
>  - New patch in series
> 
>  virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 81 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> index 88599b5..8067e76 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
> @@ -589,6 +589,78 @@ static bool handle_mmio_sgi_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	return false;
>  }
>  
> +#define LR_CPUID(lr)	\
> +	(((lr) & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID) >> GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
> +#define LR_IRQID(lr)	\
> +	((lr) & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID)
> +
> +static void vgic_retire_lr(int lr_nr, int irq, struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu)
> +{
> +	clear_bit(lr_nr, vgic_cpu->lr_used);
> +	vgic_cpu->vgic_lr[lr_nr] &= ~GICH_LR_STATE;
> +	vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq] = LR_EMPTY;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * vgic_unqueue_irqs - move pending IRQs from LRs to the distributor
> + * @vgic_cpu: Pointer to the vgic_cpu struct holding the LRs
> + *
> + * Move any pending IRQs that have already been assigned to LRs back to the
> + * emulated distributor state so that the complete emulated state can be read
> + * from the main emulation structures without investigating the LRs.
> + *
> + * Note that IRQs in the active state in the LRs get their pending state moved
> + * to the distributor but the active state stays in the LRs, because we don't
> + * track the active state on the distributor side.
> + */
> +static void vgic_unqueue_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	struct vgic_dist *dist = &vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic;
> +	struct vgic_cpu *vgic_cpu = &vcpu->arch.vgic_cpu;
> +	int vcpu_id = vcpu->vcpu_id;
> +	int i, irq, source_cpu;
> +	u32 *lr;
> +
> +	for_each_set_bit(i, vgic_cpu->lr_used, vgic_cpu->nr_lr) {
> +		lr = &vgic_cpu->vgic_lr[i];
> +		irq = LR_IRQID(*lr);
> +		source_cpu = LR_CPUID(*lr);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * There are three options for the state bits:
> +		 *
> +		 * 01: pending
> +		 * 10: active
> +		 * 11: pending and active
> +		 *
> +		 * If the LR holds only an active interrupt (not pending) then
> +		 * just leave it alone.
> +		 */
> +		if ((*lr & GICH_LR_STATE) == GICH_LR_ACTIVE_BIT)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the interrupt was only pending (not "active" or "pending
> +		 * and active") then we the pending state will get moved to
                                     ^^ extra 'we'
> +		 * the distributor and the LR does not hold any info and can
> +		 * be marked as free for other use.
> +		 */
> +		if ((*lr & GICH_LR_STATE) == GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT)
> +			vgic_retire_lr(i, irq, vgic_cpu);

We should handle the ACTIVE+PENDING case, and I don't think we do.
Should it be (*lr & GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT)? I think the previous version
handled this case correctly.

> +		/*
> +		 * Finally, reestablish the pending state on the distributor
> +		 * and the CPU interface.  It may have already been pending,
> +		 * but that is fine, then we are only setting a few bits that
> +		 * were already set.
> +		 */
> +		vgic_dist_irq_set(vcpu, irq);
> +		if (irq < VGIC_NR_SGIS)
> +			dist->irq_sgi_sources[vcpu_id][irq] |= 1 << source_cpu;
> +		vgic_update_state(vcpu->kvm);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static bool handle_mmio_sgi_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  				  struct kvm_exit_mmio *mmio,
>  				  phys_addr_t offset)
> @@ -848,8 +920,6 @@ static void vgic_update_state(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -#define LR_CPUID(lr)	\
> -	(((lr) & GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID) >> GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT)
>  #define MK_LR_PEND(src, irq)	\
>  	(GICH_LR_PENDING_BIT | ((src) << GICH_LR_PHYSID_CPUID_SHIFT) | (irq))
>  
> @@ -871,9 +941,7 @@ static void vgic_retire_disabled_irqs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		int irq = vgic_cpu->vgic_lr[lr] & GICH_LR_VIRTUALID;
>  
>  		if (!vgic_irq_is_enabled(vcpu, irq)) {
> -			vgic_cpu->vgic_irq_lr_map[irq] = LR_EMPTY;
> -			clear_bit(lr, vgic_cpu->lr_used);
> -			vgic_cpu->vgic_lr[lr] &= ~GICH_LR_STATE;
> +			vgic_retire_lr(lr, irq, vgic_cpu);
>  			if (vgic_irq_is_active(vcpu, irq))
>  				vgic_irq_clear_active(vcpu, irq);
>  		}
> @@ -1675,6 +1743,14 @@ static int vgic_attr_regs_access(struct kvm_device *dev,
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Move all pending IRQs from the LRs on all VCPUs so the pending
> +	 * state can be properly represented in the register state accessible
> +	 * through this API.
> +	 */
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(c, tmp_vcpu, dev->kvm)
> +		vgic_unqueue_irqs(tmp_vcpu);
> +
>  	offset -= r->base;
>  	r->handle_mmio(vcpu, &mmio, offset);
>  
> 


-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-16 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-12 19:55 [PATCH 00/10] Support VGIC save/restore using device control API Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 01/10] ARM: KVM: Allow creating the VGIC after VCPUs Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: arm-vgic: Support KVM_CREATE_DEVICE for VGIC Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-16 11:45   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-16 11:45     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-16 17:08     ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-16 17:08       ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: arm-vgic: Set base addr through device API Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-16 11:46   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-16 11:46     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 04/10] irqchip: arm-gic: Define additional MMIO offsets and masks Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: arm-vgic: Make vgic mmio functions more generic Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 06/10] arm/arm64: kvm: Set vcpu->cpu to -1 on vcpu_put Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-16 11:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-16 11:49     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: arm-vgic: Add vgic reg access from dev attr Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-16 11:51   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-16 11:51     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: arm-vgic: Support unqueueing of LRs to the dist Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-16 12:53   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2013-12-16 12:53     ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-16 17:07     ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-16 17:07       ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: arm-vgic: Add GICD_SPENDSGIR and GICD_CPENDSGIR handlers Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: arm-vgic: Support CPU interface reg access Christoffer Dall
2013-12-12 19:55   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-13 17:21 ` [PATCH 00/10] Support VGIC save/restore using device control API Christoffer Dall
2013-12-13 17:21   ` Christoffer Dall
2013-12-16 12:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2013-12-16 12:56   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52AEF7D1.5050309@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.