From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: "linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: move ip6_sk_accept_pmtu from generic pmtu update path to ipv6 one
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:57:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B2ED52.90604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131219115458.GC14429@order.stressinduktion.org>
On 12/19/2013 12:54 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> In commit 93b36cf3425b9b ("ipv6: support IPV6_PMTU_INTERFACE on sockets")
> I made a horrible mistake to add ip6_sk_accept_pmtu to the generic
> sctp_icmp_frag_needed path. This results in build warnings if IPv6 is
> disabled which were luckily caught by Fengguang's kbuild bot. But it
> also leads to a kernel panic IPv4 frag-needed packet is received.
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Thanks, also cc'ing linux-sctp.
Fixes: 93b36cf3425b ("ipv6: support IPV6_PMTU_INTERFACE on sockets")
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/input.c | 3 ---
> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/input.c b/net/sctp/input.c
> index 042ec6c..2a192a7 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/input.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/input.c
> @@ -389,9 +389,6 @@ void sctp_icmp_frag_needed(struct sock *sk, struct sctp_association *asoc,
> if (!t || (t->pathmtu <= pmtu))
> return;
>
> - if (!ip6_sk_accept_pmtu(sk))
> - return;
> -
> if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
> asoc->pmtu_pending = 1;
> t->pmtu_pending = 1;
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> index 32db816..00bea3f 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> @@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ static void sctp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
>
> switch (type) {
> case ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG:
> - sctp_icmp_frag_needed(sk, asoc, transport, ntohl(info));
> + if (ip6_sk_accept_pmtu(sk))
> + sctp_icmp_frag_needed(sk, asoc, transport, ntohl(info));
> goto out_unlock;
> case ICMPV6_PARAMPROB:
> if (ICMPV6_UNK_NEXTHDR = code) {
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com
Cc: "linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: move ip6_sk_accept_pmtu from generic pmtu update path to ipv6 one
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:57:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52B2ED52.90604@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131219115458.GC14429@order.stressinduktion.org>
On 12/19/2013 12:54 PM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> In commit 93b36cf3425b9b ("ipv6: support IPV6_PMTU_INTERFACE on sockets")
> I made a horrible mistake to add ip6_sk_accept_pmtu to the generic
> sctp_icmp_frag_needed path. This results in build warnings if IPv6 is
> disabled which were luckily caught by Fengguang's kbuild bot. But it
> also leads to a kernel panic IPv4 frag-needed packet is received.
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Thanks, also cc'ing linux-sctp.
Fixes: 93b36cf3425b ("ipv6: support IPV6_PMTU_INTERFACE on sockets")
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
> ---
> net/sctp/input.c | 3 ---
> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/input.c b/net/sctp/input.c
> index 042ec6c..2a192a7 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/input.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/input.c
> @@ -389,9 +389,6 @@ void sctp_icmp_frag_needed(struct sock *sk, struct sctp_association *asoc,
> if (!t || (t->pathmtu <= pmtu))
> return;
>
> - if (!ip6_sk_accept_pmtu(sk))
> - return;
> -
> if (sock_owned_by_user(sk)) {
> asoc->pmtu_pending = 1;
> t->pmtu_pending = 1;
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> index 32db816..00bea3f 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> @@ -172,7 +172,8 @@ static void sctp_v6_err(struct sk_buff *skb, struct inet6_skb_parm *opt,
>
> switch (type) {
> case ICMPV6_PKT_TOOBIG:
> - sctp_icmp_frag_needed(sk, asoc, transport, ntohl(info));
> + if (ip6_sk_accept_pmtu(sk))
> + sctp_icmp_frag_needed(sk, asoc, transport, ntohl(info));
> goto out_unlock;
> case ICMPV6_PARAMPROB:
> if (ICMPV6_UNK_NEXTHDR == code) {
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-19 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-19 11:54 [PATCH net-next] ipv6: move ip6_sk_accept_pmtu from generic pmtu update path to ipv6 one Hannes Frederic Sowa
2013-12-19 12:57 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2013-12-19 12:57 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52B2ED52.90604@redhat.com \
--to=dborkman@redhat.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@stressinduktion.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.