From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Robert Graffham <psquid@psquid.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux390@de.ibm.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-alph
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Slightly outdated CONFIG_SMP documentation fix
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:58:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C35A3D.8090109@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131231225921.GA1624@sylph>
On 12/31/2013 02:59 PM, Robert Graffham wrote:
> I've removed a reference to "most personal computers" being singleprocessor
> machines in multiple arches' config help, and also brought the arch/arm spacing
> for "singleprocessor" (vs. "single processor" used there originally) in line
> with other arches that had that text.
>
> The diff is included below, and cleanly applies and builds on my system. I have
> not tested on other systems yet since a documentation fix shouldn't fail to
> build inconsistently, but if that's no excuse, I'll be happy to test further
> when I can.
>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Robert Graffham <psquid@psquid.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
linux390@de.ibm.com, Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-m32r@ml.linux-m32r.org, linux-m32r-ja@ml.linux-m32r.org,
linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-am33-list@redhat.com,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Slightly outdated CONFIG_SMP documentation fix
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:58:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C35A3D.8090109@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131231225921.GA1624@sylph>
On 12/31/2013 02:59 PM, Robert Graffham wrote:
> I've removed a reference to "most personal computers" being singleprocessor
> machines in multiple arches' config help, and also brought the arch/arm spacing
> for "singleprocessor" (vs. "single processor" used there originally) in line
> with other arches that had that text.
>
> The diff is included below, and cleanly applies and builds on my system. I have
> not tested on other systems yet since a documentation fix shouldn't fail to
> build inconsistently, but if that's no excuse, I'll be happy to test further
> when I can.
>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] Slightly outdated CONFIG_SMP documentation fix
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 15:58:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52C35A3D.8090109@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131231225921.GA1624@sylph>
On 12/31/2013 02:59 PM, Robert Graffham wrote:
> I've removed a reference to "most personal computers" being singleprocessor
> machines in multiple arches' config help, and also brought the arch/arm spacing
> for "singleprocessor" (vs. "single processor" used there originally) in line
> with other arches that had that text.
>
> The diff is included below, and cleanly applies and builds on my system. I have
> not tested on other systems yet since a documentation fix shouldn't fail to
> build inconsistently, but if that's no excuse, I'll be happy to test further
> when I can.
>
Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-31 23:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-31 22:59 [PATCH] Slightly outdated CONFIG_SMP documentation fix Robert Graffham
2013-12-31 22:59 ` Robert Graffham
2013-12-31 22:59 ` Robert Graffham
2013-12-31 22:59 ` Robert Graffham
2013-12-31 22:59 ` Robert Graffham
2013-12-31 23:58 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-12-31 23:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-12-31 23:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-01-02 14:56 ` David Howells
2014-01-02 14:56 ` David Howells
2014-01-02 14:56 ` David Howells
2014-01-02 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-02 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-02 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-02 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <CAAJfVc7vK9W9Zy0LvGWSTWMSEb_JEx7FbLECy44QEwj+CWgSGg@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-02 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-02 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-02 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-02 23:15 ` Andrew Morton
2014-01-03 0:36 ` Robert Graffham
2014-01-03 0:36 ` Robert Graffham
2014-01-03 0:36 ` Robert Graffham
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-12-22 19:33 Psychedelic Squid
2013-12-22 19:33 ` Psychedelic Squid
2013-12-22 19:33 ` Psychedelic Squid
2013-12-22 19:33 ` Psychedelic Squid
2013-12-22 19:33 ` Psychedelic Squid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52C35A3D.8090109@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jejb@parisc-linux.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=psquid@psquid.net \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
--cc=takata@linux-m32r.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.