All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] evtchn/fifo: initialize priority when events are bound
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 18:04:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CAF039.1050505@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52AF03EE.1010202@citrix.com>

On 16/12/13 13:45, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 10/12/13 14:50, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 10.12.13 at 14:56, David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>>>
>>> Event channel ports that are reused or that were not in the initial
>>> bucket would have a non-default priority.
>>>
>>> Add an init evtchn_port_op hook and use this to set the priority when
>>> an event channel is bound.
>>>
>>> Within this new evtchn_fifo_init() call, also check if the event is
>>> already on a queue and print a warning, as this event may have its
>>> first event delivered on a queue with the wrong VCPU or priority.
>>> This guest is expected to prevent this (if it cares) by not unbinding
>>> events that are still linked.
>>>
>>
>> Reported-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 
> Keir,  if you hadn't noticed, this touches common code and thus needs
> your ack.

Ping?

> I would like to see these fixes go in prior to the first RC as without
> patch 2, the FIFO event channels don't really work if irqbalanced is
> used (which seems to be a common setup[1]).
> 
> David
> 
> [1] Except my main test box for some reason...

David

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-06 18:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-10 13:56 [PATCHv7 0/2] Xen: FIFO-based event channel fixes David Vrabel
2013-12-10 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] evtchn/fifo: initialize priority when events are bound David Vrabel
2013-12-10 14:50   ` Jan Beulich
2013-12-10 14:54     ` David Vrabel
2013-12-16 13:45     ` David Vrabel
2014-01-06 18:04       ` David Vrabel [this message]
2014-01-07 15:50   ` Keir Fraser
2013-12-10 13:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] evtchn/fifo: don't corrupt queues if an old tail is linked David Vrabel
2013-12-10 14:55   ` Jan Beulich
2014-01-07 15:50   ` Keir Fraser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52CAF039.1050505@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.